The use of Tik Tok in higher education as a motivating source for students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi38.21684Keywords:
Tik Tok, learning tool, innovative approach, new technologies, motivationAbstract
This article presents a study conducted at the University of Málaga with the participation of second-year students from the Degree in English Studies. It focuses on a Tik Tok project that the participants had to edit for the British History class in the academic year 2020/2021. The students’ reception of said project as an innovative learning tool, both as applied to English as a second language and to the content of the courses, was analysed and measured using a questionnaire that was elaborated ad hoc and properly validated. Our results indicate great success and acceptance of the activity on the part of the students, who consider that this innovative approach to learning being highly integrated with new technologies fosters the comprehension and active learning of the subject, thus enhancing comprehension in a stimulating and motivating way.
Key words: Tik Tok, learning tool, innovative approach, new technologies, motivation.
Downloads
References
Aguilar, M., & Rodríguez, R. (2012). Lecturer and student perceptions on CLIL at a Spanish university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.615906
Bhatia, V. (2004). Academic literacy in higher education. In Integrating content and language. Meeting the challenge of a multilingual education (pp. 55–77). Maastricht University.
Brooks, K. J. (2021, December 23). TikTok tops Google as the most visited website on the internet. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tiktok-google-facebook-social-media-internet/
Bulger, M., Mayer, R., & Almeroth, K. (2008). Measuring learning engagement in computer-equipped college classrooms. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(2), 129–143.
Cendoya, A. M., Di Bin, V., & Peluffo, M. V. (2008). AICLE: Aprendizaje integrado de contenidos y lenguas extranjeras o CLIL (Content and language integrated learning). Puertas Abiertas, 4(4), 65–68.
Coyle, D. (2010). Foreword. In D. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. vii–viii). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dafouz, E., Núñez, B., & Sancho, C. (2007). Analysing stance in a CLIL university context: Non-native speaker use of personal pronouns and modal verbs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 647–662. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb464.0
Dearden, J. (2015). English as a medium of instruction: A growing phenomenon. British Council.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. Plenum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Espuny, C., González, J., Lleixà, M., & Gisbert, M. (2011). Actitudes y expectativas del uso educativo de las redes sociales en los alumnos universitarios. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 8(1), 171–185.
Feixas, M., Codó, E., Couso, D., Espinet, M., & Masats, D. (2009). Enseñar en inglés en la universidad: Reflexiones del alumnado y el profesorado en torno a dos experiencias AICLE. In R. Roig, J. Blasco, M.A. Cano, R. Gilar, A. Lledó, & C. Mañas (Eds.), Investigar desde un contexto educativo innovador (pp. 137–153). Editorial Marfil.
Ferriter, W. M., Ramsden, J. T., & Sheninger, E. (2011). Communicating and connecting with social media. Solution Tree Press.
Finn, J.D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S.L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). Springer Science & Business Media.
García-García, M., Carpintero Molina, E., Biencinto López, C., & Núñez del Río, M. C. (2014). La evaluación del proyecto SOU-estuTUtor: Percepción de los mentores. Revista Complutense de Educación, 25(2), 433–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED
García-Sánchez, M., Reyes-Añorve, J., & Godínez-Alarcón, C. (2017). Las TIC en la educación superior, innovaciones y retos. Revista Iberoamericana de las Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, 6(12), 299–316.
García-Suárez, J., Trigueros-Cervantes, C., & Rivera-García, E. (2015). Twitter como recurso para evaluar el proceso de enseñanza universitaria. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(3), 32–44.
Gardner, R.C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
Garrigos-Simón, F. J., Oltra Gutiérrez, J. V., Narangajavana, Y., & Estellés Miguel, S. (2016). Ventajas y usos de Twitter como herramienta de mejora de la educación universitaria. Libro de Actas IN-RED 2016 - II Congreso Nacional de Innovación Educativa y de Docencia En Red. In-Red 2016 - Congreso de Innovación Educativa y Docencia en Red de la Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/INRED2016.2016.4416
Heckhausen, H. (1991). Motivation and action. Springer.
Junco, R., Elvasky, C. M., & Heiberger, G. (2012). Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 1–15.
Junta de Andalucía. (2017). Acuerdo de 24 de enero de 2017, del Consejo de Gobierno, por el que se aprueba el Plan Estratégico de Desarrollo de las Lenguas en Andalucía Horizonte 2020. Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía, 24, 10–57. https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/boja/2017/24/BOJA17-024-00048-1794-01_00107169.pdf
Kasuma, A., & Adi Kasuma, S.A. (2017). Using facebook for English language learning: The differences among gender and ethnicity. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 2(1), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol2iss1pp177-193
Kuh, G.D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706.
Lasagabaster, D. (2011). English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 3–18.
Macfarlane, B., & Tomlinson, M. (2017). Critiques of student engagement. Higher Education Policy, 30(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0027-3
Muñoz, C., & Navés, T. (2009). CLIL in Spain. In D. Marsh & D. Wolff (Eds.), Windows on CLIL. Content and Language Integrated Learning in the European spotlight (pp. 160–165). European Centre for Modern Languages.
Mustafa, A. (2012). Student attention, engagement and participation in a Twitter-friendly classroom. Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), 1–9.
Navés, D., & Victori, M. (2010). CLIL in Catalonia: An overview of research studies. In D. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. 30–54). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Park, C. (2003). Engaging students in the learning process: The learning journal. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(2), 183–199.
Pérez Alarcón, S. (2010). El aprendizaje cooperativo. Temas para la Educación, 8.
Pérez-Vidal, C. (2011). Language acquisition in three different contests of learning: Formal instruction, stay abroad, and semi-immersion (CLIL). In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra, & F. Gallardo (Eds.), Content and foreign language integrated learning. Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts (pp. 109–127). Peter Lang.
Pinner, R. (2013). Authenticity of purpose: CLIL as a way to bring meaning and motivation into EFL contexts. Asian EFL Journal, 15(4), 138–159.
Rach, M., & Lounis, M. (2021). The focus on students’ attention! Does TikTok’s edutok initiative propose an alternative perspective to the design of institutional learning environments? In T. Antipova (Ed.), Integrated Science in Digital Age 2020 (pp. 241–251). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49264-9_22
Romero Ariza, M., & Pérez Ferra, M. (2009). Cómo motivar a aprender en la universidad: Una estrategia fundamental contra el fracaso académico en los nuevos modelos educativos. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 51, 87–105.
Rutherford, C. (2010). Using online social media to support preservice student engagement. Journal of Online Learnign and Teaching, 6(4), 703–711.
Ucar, H., & Goksel, N. (2020). Enhancing online EFL learners’ motivation and engagement through supplementary activities on Facebook. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3881576
Wesche, M. B. (2002). Early French immersion: How has the original Canadian model stood the test of time? In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds.), An integrated view of language development (pp. 357–379). WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
Wright, J. (2004). Lecturers’ perceptions of integration: A study of textual typology. In R. Wilkinson (Ed.), Integrating content and language. Meeting the challenge of a multilingual education (pp. 536–546). Maastricht University.
Yang, H. (2020). Secondary-school students’ perspectives of utilizing TikTok for English learning in and beyond the EFL classroom. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education Technology and Social Science (ETSS 2020), 162–183.
Zarichna, O., Buchatska, S., Melnyk, L., & Savchuk, T. (2020). Content and language integrated learning in tertiary education: Perspectives on terms of use and integration. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 7(1), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2020.7.1.zar
Zuo, H., & Wang, T. (2019). Analysis of TikTok user behavior from the perspective of popular culture. Frontiers in Art Research, 1(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.25236/FAR.20190301
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The research reported in this article was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the research project “Análisis de sentimiento de base lingüística con parsing retórico-discursivo (DisParSA)” (PID2020-115310RB-I00), as well as by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Vocational Training (Ref. FPU 19/04880).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain copyright and guarantee to the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately enter into additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).