Metamotivation: Self-regulating task–motivation fit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.viIX.29880Keywords:
regulatory focus theory, metamotivational beliefs, motivational trade-offs, regulatory flexibility, self-regulationAbstract
Regulating one’s motivation contributes to well-being and success across various domains, including language learning. For example, activating a promotion versus prevention regulatory focus orientation is generally more compatible with tasks requiring creativity and innovation (e.g., brainstorming) versus tasks requiring vigilance (e.g., proofreading), respectively. Metamotivation represents awareness of such task–motivation fit. This article reports a study involving Saudi language learners of English (N = 311) who were presented with language-related tasks requiring two different motivational orientations (e.g., brainstorming vs. proofreading) and were asked to indicate their preferred incentive structure (inducing eagerness vs. vigilance) under two contexts (independent vs. interdependent). The results showed that the participants exhibited metamotivational awareness in terms of promotion, but not prevention, orientation. Female participants displayed a marked overgeneralization bias, clearly favoring a promotion-inducing incentive structure even for vigilance tasks. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to task engagement and persistence and to expanding the scope of language motivation theory, paving the way for a new line of research into language learning metamotivation.
Downloads
References
Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2015). Human agency: Does the beach ball have free will? In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 55–72). Multilingual Matters.
Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2017). Sixty years of language motivation research: Looking back and looking forward. SAGE Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017701976
Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2018). The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(4), 721–754. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.4.2
Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2019). Motivation and the unconscious. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry, & S. Ryan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 561–578). Palgrave Macmillan.
Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2021). Storytelling motivation: Creating role models with inspirational stories. Journal of Research in Language and Translation, 1(1), 1–16.
Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2022). Measures of implicit attitudes. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp. 466–476). Routledge.
Al-Hoorie, A. H., & MacIntyre, P. D. (Eds.). (2020). Contemporary language motivation theory: 60 years since Gardner and Lambert (1959). Multilingual Matters.
Al-Hoorie, A. H., Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., Hiver, P., & Vitta, J. P. (2022). Self-determination mini-theories in second language learning: A systematic review of three decades of research. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221102686
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 794–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022981
Bittner, J. V., Bruena, M., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2016). Cooperation goals, regulatory focus, and their combined effects on creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 260–268. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.tsc.2015.12.002
Bonanno, G. A., & Burton, C. L. (2013). Regulatory flexibility: An individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504116
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174794
Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Elliot, A. J., Chirkov, V. I., Kim, Y., & Sheldon, K. M. (2001). A cross-cultural analysis of avoidance (relative to approach) personal goals. Psychological Science, 12(6), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00393
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
Halamish, V., Nussinson, R., & Ben-Ari, L. (2013). In a year, memory will benefit from learning, tomorrow it won’t: Distance and construal level effects on the basis of metamemory judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(5), 1621–1627. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032381
Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217–1230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Mercer, S. (Eds.). (2021). Student engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters.
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289
Hiver, P., Larsen-Freeman, D., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Lowie, W. (2023). Complex dynamic systems and language education: A sampling of current research – Editorial. International Journal of Complexity in Education, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.26262/IJCE.V4I1.9476
Hiver, P., & Wu, J. (2023). Engagement in TBLT. In C. Lambert, S. Aubrey, & G. Bui (Eds.), The role of the learner in task-based language teaching (pp. 74–80). Routledge.
Inzlicht, M., Werner, K. M., Briskin, J. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2021). Integrating models of self-regulation. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-061020-105721
Kuratomi, K., Johnsen, L., Kitagami, S., Hatano, A., & Murayama, K. (2023). People underestimate their capability to motivate themselves without performance-based extrinsic incentives. Motivation and Emotion, 47(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-09996-5
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(5905), 1201–1205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161958
Lockwood, P., Marshall, T. C., & Sadler, P. (2005). Promoting success or preventing failure: Cultural differences in motivation by positive and negative role models. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271598
MacGregor, K. E., Carnevale, J. J., Dusthimer, N. E., & Fujita, K. (2017). Knowledge of the self-control benefits of high-level versus low-level construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(4), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000130
Mercer, S., Talbot, K. R., & Wang, I. K.-H. (2021). Fake or real engagement – Looks can be deceiving. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 143–162). Multilingual Matters.
Miele, D. B., & Scholer, A. A. (2018). The role of metamotivational monitoring in motivation regulation. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1371601
Miele, D. B., Scholer, A. A., & Fujita, K. (2020). Metamotivation: Emerging research on the regulation of motivational states. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 7, pp. 1–42). Elsevier.
Murayama, K., Kitagami, S., Tanaka, A., & Raw, J. A. L. (2016). People’s naiveté about how extrinsic rewards influence intrinsic motivation. Motivation Science, 2(3), 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000040
Nguyen, T., Carnevale, J. J., Scholer, A. A., Miele, D. B., & Fujita, K. (2019). Metamotivational knowledge of the role of high-level and low-level construal in goal-relevant task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(5), 876–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000166
Nguyen, T., Togawa, T., Scholer, A. A., Miele, D. B., & Fujita, K. (2022). A cross-cultural investigation of metamotivational beliefs about regulatory focus task-motivation fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(5), 807–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211025423
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., Fryer, L. K., & Larson-Hall, J. (2019). The critical role of the individual in language education: New directions from the learning sciences. System, 86, 102118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102118
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., Parrish, A., & Noels, K. (2022). Taking root: Self-determination in language education. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.52598/jpll/4/1/9
Papi, M. (2018). Motivation as quality: Regulatory fit effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(4), 707–730. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311700033X
Papi, M., & Khajavy, G. H. (2021). Motivational mechanisms underlying second language achievement: A regulatory focus perspective. Language Learning, 71(2), 537–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12443
Ross, J., Nguyen, T., Fujita, K., Miele, D. B., Scholer, A. A., & Edwards, M. C. (2023). The relationship between metamotivational knowledge and performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1124171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124171
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Sansone, C. (2009). What’s interest got to do with it?: Potential trade-offs in the self-regulation of motivation. In J. P. Forgas, R. F. Baumeister, & D. M. Tice (Eds.), Psychology of self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes. (pp. 35–51). Psychology Press.
Sansone, C., Weir, C., Harpster, L., & Morgan, C. (1992). Once a boring task always a boring task? Interest as a self-regulatory mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.379
Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Duke, S. C. (2011). Self-control at high and low levels of mental construal. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610385955
Scholer, A. A., & Higgins, E. T. (2012). Too much of a good thing? Trade-offs in promotion and prevention focus. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 65–84). Oxford University Press.
Scholer, A. A., & Miele, D. B. (2016). The role of metamotivation in creating task-motivation fit. Motivation Science, 2(3), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000043
Scholer, A. A., Miele, D. B., Murayama, K., & Fujita, K. (2018). New directions in self-regulation: The role of metamotivational beliefs. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418790549
Schwinger, M., & Otterpohl, N. (2017). Which one works best? Considering the relative importance of motivational regulation strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.12.003
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
Tamir, M. (2009). What do people want to feel and why?: Pleasure and utility in emotion regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01617.x
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.876
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
Uskul, A. K., Sherman, D. K., & Fitzgibbon, J. (2009). The cultural congruency effect: Culture, regulatory focus, and the effectiveness of gain- vs. loss-framed health messages. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 535–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.005
Weibel, A., Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2009). Pay for performance in the public sector—Benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup009
Werner, K. M., & Milyavskaya, M. (2018). We may not know what we want, but do we know what we need? Examining the ability to forecast need satisfaction in goal pursuit. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(6), 656–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617720274
Wimperis, B. R., & Farr, J. L. (1979). The effects of task content and reward contingency upon task performance and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9(3), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1979.tb02708.x
Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.224
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_1
Wolters, C. A. (2011). Regulation of motivation: Contextual and social aspects. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300202
Woolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2015). The experience matters more than you think: People value intrinsic incentives more inside than outside an activity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 968–982. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000035
Zhou, S. A., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2023). Dynamic engagement: A longitudinal dual-process, reciprocal-effects model of teacher motivational practice and L2 student engagement. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231158789
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain copyright and guarantee to the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately enter into additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
