Test-taking strategy use by Chinese young EFL learners in an authentic international standardized English test

Feifei Han

doi:10.30827/portalin.vi39.24390

Authors

Feifei Han https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8464-0854

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi39.24390

Keywords:

Chinese young EFL learners, test-taking strategy use, authentic international standardized English test, Cambridge Young Learners English Test, a mixed-methods approach

Abstract

The current study examined language test-taking strategies used by Chinese young learners of English as a foreign language (EFLs) in an authentic international standardized English test–Cambridge Young Learners English Test: Flyers Test. It adopted a mixed-methods approach: the quantitative part was a survey administered to 138 participants, and the qualitative part consisted of think-aloud sessions and retrospective interviews with six participants (three were high-achievers and three were low-achievers). The quantitative results show that in general, children adopted metacognitive test-taking strategies more frequently than cognitive test-taking strategies irrespective of language skills; and the high-achievers used test-taking strategies more frequently than their low-achievers. The two-way interaction effects between levels of test performance ☓ strategy type and between language skills ☓ strategy type were also significant. The qualitative results demonstrate that the high-achievers not only used a broader range of cognitive strategies than low-achievers, they also used the same metacognitive strategies at an in-depth level and in a more sophisticated way than low-achievers. The results of the study suggest that expanding Chinese young EFL learners’ repertoire of test-taking strategies and modeling desirable ways of using strategies may help them improve their test-taking strategy use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.

Bachman, L. F. (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count counts. Language Testing, 17(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220001700101

Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford University Press.

Bachman, L., & Cohen, A. (1998). Language testing – SLA interfaces: An update. In L. Bachman & A. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 1-31). Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, A. D. (2007). The coming of age of research on test-taking strategies. In J. Fox, M. Weshe, D. Bayliss, L. Cheng, C. Turner, & C. Doe (Eds.), Language testing reconsidered (pp. 89-111). Ottawa University Press.

Cohen, A. D. (2014). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Routledge.

Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (Eds.). (2007). Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice. Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Dawadi, S. (2020). Parental involvement in national EFL test preparation. RELC Journal 51(3), 427-439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219848770

Doe, C., & Fox, J. (2011). Exploring the testing process: Three test takers’ observed and reported strategy use over time and testing contexts. Canadian Modern Language Review, 67(1), 29-54. https://doi.org/doi:10.3138/cmlr.67.1.029

Grabe, W. P., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and researching: Reading. Routledge.

Gu, L., & So, Y. (2017). Strategies used by young English learners in an assessment context. In M. Kim & Y. Butler (Eds.), English language proficiency assessments for young learners (pp. 118-135). Routledge.

Han, F. (2018). Strategic processing of Chinese young English language learners in an international standardized English language test. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01020

Jackson, D. O. (2020). Working memory and second language development: A complex, dynamic future? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 10(1), 89-109. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.5

Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00425.x

McNamara, T., Knoch, U, Fan, J., & Rossner, R. (2019). Fairness, justice & language assessment. Oxford University Press.

Nikolov, M. (2006). Test-taking strategies of 12-and 13-year-old Hungarian learners of EFL: why whales have migraines. Language Learning, 56(1), 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00341.x

Nikolov, M., & Timpe-Laughlin, V. (2021). Assessing young learners’ foreign language abilities. Language Teaching, 54(1), 1,37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000294

O’Malley, J., & Chamot, U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. (2016). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Longman.

Phakiti, A. (2003a). A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading. Language Learning, 53(4), 649-702. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9922.2003.00239.x

Phakiti, A. (2003b). A closer look at the relationship between cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20, 20-56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt243oa

Phakiti, A. (2006). Modeling cognitive and metacognitive strategies and their relationships to EFL reading test performance. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 1, 53-96.

Phakiti, A. (2008a). Construct validation of Bachman and Palmer’s (1996) strategic competence model over time in EFL reading tests. Language Testing, 25, 237-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207086783

Phakiti, A. (2008b). Strategic competence as a fourth-order factor model: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(1), 20-42. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/15434300701533596

Phakiti, A. (2016). Test-takers’ performance appraisals, appraisal calibration, and cognitive and metacognitive strategy use. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(2), 75-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300701533596

Purpura, J. E. (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test-takers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 47, 289-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.91997009

Purpura, J. E. (1998). Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with high- and low-achieving test-takers: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Testing, 15, 333-379.

Purpura, J. E. (1999). Learner strategy use and performance on language tests: A structural equation modeling approach. Cambridge University Press.

Purpura, J. E. (2016). Second and foreign language assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 190-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12308

Radwan, A. A. (2011). Effects of L2 proficiency and gender on choice of language learning strategies by university students majoring in English. Asian EFL Journal, 13(1), 115-163.

Song, X. (2005). Language learner strategy use and English proficiency on the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery. Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment, 3, 1-26.

Vandergrift, L. (2003). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26, 70-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh039

Wang, Z. & Han, F. (2017). Metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive control of writing strategy between high- and low-performing Chinese EFL writers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(7), 523-532. http://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0707.04