English learning anxiety and English learning demotivation in South Korean third-year high school students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi39.22305Keywords:
language anxiety; English learning demotivation; L2 proficiency; facilitative anxiety; motivationAbstract
Because of the high level of anxiety and academic pressure associated with the college entrance exam in South Korea, this study investigated the effects of English learning anxiety on English learning demotivation and academic achievement in third-year high school students. To determine the correlations of the effect of English learning anxiety on both components, 249 participants were selected from nine third-year student classes at an academic high school in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea, to complete questionnaires, the data from which were analysed using quantitative statistical methods. The regression analyses revealed that the English learning anxiety in the male and female students with top grades had positively and significantly affected their academic achievement. However, except for high-level male learners, demotivation was not found to have any effect on student achievement. The results suggested that it is important to design education-friendly measures to enhance third-year high school student motivation and alleviate any excessive anxiety.
Downloads
References
Andringa, S., Olsthoorn, N., Beuningen, C., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62, 49-78.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford University Press.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). The test for reception of grammar version 2. Pearson.
Bloomfield, A.,Wayland, S., Rhoades, E., Blodgett, A., Linck, J., & Ross, S. (2010). What makes listening difficult? Factors affecting second language listening comprehension. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277788621.
Bonk, W. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14, 14-31.
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge University Press.
Cai, H. (2020). Related lexical and syntactic knowledge to academic English listening: The importance of construct representation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11: 494. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00494.
Cambridge English Language Assessment (2014). The preliminary English test (PET). Cambridge University Press.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3-42.
Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Field, J. (2013). Cognitive validity. In A. Geranpayeh, & L. Taylor (Eds.), Examining listening: Research and practice in assessing second language listening (pp. 77 - 151). Cambridge University Press.
Graham, S. (2011). Self-efficacy and academic listening. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 113-117.
Leonard, K. R. (2019). Examining the relationship between decoding and comprehension in L2 listening. System, 87, 14-25.
Macaro, E., Graham, S., & Woore, R. (2016). Improving foreign language teaching: towards a research-based curriculum and pedagogy. Routledge.
Masrai, A. (2019a). Exploring the impact of individual differences in aural vocabulary knowledge, written vocabulary knowledge and working memory capacity on explaining L2 learners’ listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics Review, 10(1), 1-25.
Masrai, A. (2019b). Vocabulary and reading comprehension revisited: Evidence for high-, mid-, and low-frequency vocabulary knowledge. SAGE Open, April-June 1-13. DOI: 10.1177/2158244019845182.
Matthews, J. (2018). Vocabulary for listening: Emerging evidence for high and mid-frequency vocabulary knowledge. System, 72, 23-36.
Matthews, J., & Cheng, J. (2015). Recognition of high frequency words from speech as a predictor of L2 listening comprehension. System, 52, 1-13.
McLean, S., Kramer, B., & Beglar, D. (2015). The creation and validation of a listening vocabulary levels test. Language Teaching Research, 19, 741-760.
Mecartty, F. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11, 323-348.
Milton, J., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Aural Lex. Swansea. Swansea University.
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59-81.
Nation, I. S. P. (2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists (17 September 2012). Unpublished paper. Available at: www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nation.
Staehr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. SSLA, 31, 577-607.
Vafaee, P., & Suzuki, Y. (2019). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge in second language listening ability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42 (2), 383-410. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263119000676.
Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65, 390-416.
Wallace, M. P. (2020). Individual differences in second language listening: Examining the role of knowledge, metacognitive awareness, memory, and attention. Language Learning. DOI:10.1111/lang.12424.
Wang, Y., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2017). Explaining listening comprehension among L2 learners of English: the contribution of general language proficiency, vocabulary knowledge and metacognitive awareness. System, 65, 139-150.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain copyright and guarantee to the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately enter into additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).