Design and validation of a tool to evaluate CLIL in Physical Education sessions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi37.17795Keywords:
cuestionario, validez, fiabilidad, formación del profesorado AICLE, programación AICLE, competencias AICLEAbstract
The aim of the present study was to validate a questionnaire for the Evaluation of Physical Education Sessions through CLIL (CESEFA). It is one of the first instruments for the evaluation of CLIL in Physical Education sessions whose descriptive quantitative design is based on the most recent findings in the scientific literature. An expert evaluation was carried out for the confirmation and wording of the selected items with a concordance between them of ,73 in the Kappa coefficient. A sample of 146 (V=87 and M=59) PE teachers, an exploratory analysis and a confirmatory factor analysis were used for validation, which supported the three-dimensional factor structure of the instrument. The questionnaire has an apparent validity and a good level of consistency allowing its extrapolation to other contexts. Moreover, it can be a good tool for the guidance and self-assessment of bilingual PE teachers who use CLIL in their classes.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain copyright and guarantee to the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately enter into additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
