Sondear el conocimiento, las percepciones y las prácticas de maestros novatos y experimentados en el aula de EFL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi2023c.29628Palabras clave:
Maestro EFL, maestro principiante, maestro con experiencia, andamioResumen
Debido al inestimable papel de los andamios en el entorno de la enseñanza de idiomas, hasta la fecha se han realizado varios estudios de idiomas sobre esta construcción. Sin embargo, el papel de la experiencia docente en la comprensión e implementación de prácticas de andamiaje en los contextos de inglés como lengua extranjera (EFL) ha sido raramente explorado. Para llenar este vacío, este estudio investigó las percepciones, el conocimiento y las prácticas de andamiaje de los profesores de EFL novatos y experimentados en China. Al hacerlo, 487 maestros chinos de EFL completaron un cuestionario seguido de una entrevista semiestructurada con 22 participantes. Los resultados del análisis temático revelaron que los profesores de EFL novatos y experimentados tienen diferentes percepciones de los andamios y sus prácticas en el aula. Además, los resultados de la prueba t de muestras independientes revelaron una diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre las percepciones, el conocimiento y las prácticas de andamiaje de los profesores principiantes y experimentados de EFL en el contexto chino, con el grupo experimentado teniendo puntuaciones más altas. Se discuten las posibles implicaciones para los maestros y capacitadores de EFL para aumentar su comprensión de la teoría y práctica de andamios.
Descargas
Citas
Acara, I. H., Hong, S., & Wuc, C. (2017). Examining the role of teacher presence and scaffolding in preschoolers' peer interactions. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(6), 866–884.
Ahmadi Safa, M., & Motaghi, F. (2021). Cognitive vs. metacognitive scaffolding strategies and EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. Language Teaching Research, 1-24.
Awadelkarim, A. A. (2021). An analysis and insight into the effectiveness of scaffolding: EFL instructors'/teachers' perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 828-841. doi: 10.52462/jlls.58
Banitalebi, Z., Ghiasvand, F. (2023). The representation of Learning-Oriented Assessment (LOA) practice in EFL contexts: A case study of teacher questioning strategies. Language Related Research Journal. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23223081.1401.0.0.261.3
Bransford, J., Brown, A. & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
Brauer, S., Korhonen, A. M., & Siklander, P. (2019). Online scaffolding in digital open badge driven learning. Educational Research, 61(1), 53–69.
Bruner, J. (1987). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvelle, & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), The child's concept of language (pp. 241–256). Springer.
Chen, S. Y., & Tseng, Y. F. (2019). The impacts of scaffolding e-assessment English learning: A cognitive style perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1661853.
Dabbagh, N. (2003). Scaffolding: An important teacher competency in online learning. Tech Trends, 47(2), 39-44.
Derakhshan, A. (2022a). The “5Cs” positive teacher interpersonal behaviors: Implications for learner empowerment and learning in an L2 context. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/9783031165276
Derakhshan, A. (2022b). Revisiting research on positive psychology in second and foreign language education: Trends and directions. Language Related Research, 13(5), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.52547/LRR.13.5.1
Derakhshan, A., & Ghiasvand, F. (2022). Demystifying Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions and practices of learning-oriented assessment (LOA): Challenges and prospects in focus. Language Testing in Asia, 12(55), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468‑022‑00204‑2
Engin, M. (2014). Macro-scaffolding: Contextual support for teacher learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(5), 26-40.
Fareed, M., Ashraf, A. & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL learners’ writing skills: Problems, factors
and suggestions. Journal of Education and Social Science, 4(2), 82-93.
Goh, C.C.M. (2017). Scaffolding learning processes to improve speaking performance. Language Teaching, 50(2), 247-260.
Hartman, H. (2002). Scaffolding and cooperative learning. In H. Hartman, (Ed), Human
learning and instruction (pp.23-69). City College of City University of New York.
Haruehansawasin, S., & Kiattikomol, P. (2017). Scaffolding in problem-based learning for low-achieving learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(3), 363–370.
Hasan, W. M. M. W., & Zubairi, A. M. (2016). Assessment competency among primary
English language teachers in Malaysia.Prague: Proceedings of MAC-ETL 2016, 66.
Hogan, K. and Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Brookline Books.
Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127-143.
Kazak, S., Wegerif, R., & Fujita, T. (2015). Combining scaffolding for content and scaffolding for dialogue to support conceptual breakthroughs in understanding probability. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1269-1283.
Khamwan, T. (2007). The effects of interactional strategy training on teacher-student interaction in an EFL classroom (Unpublished master thesis). Nakhon Ratchasima, Suranaree University of Technology.
Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Sociocultural theory and second language learning research: An exegesis. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 335– 354). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Li, D., & Zhang, L. (2022). Exploring teacher scaffolding in a CLIL-framed EFL intensive reading class: A classroom discourse analysis approach. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 333-360. doi:10.1177/1362168820903340
Maybin, J., Mercer, N., & Stierer, B. (1992). Scaffolding: Learning in the classroom. In N. Kate (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the national oracy project (pp. 186-195). Hodder & Stoughton.
McKenzie, J. (2000). Scaffolding for Success. Cambridge University Press.
McLeod, S. A. (2019). Zone of proximal development. Retrieved November 5, 2022, from www.simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal-Development.html
Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2007). Scaffolding emotions in classrooms. Academic Press.
Mirahmadi, S.H., & Alavi, S.M. (2016). The role of traditional and virtual scaffolding in developing speaking ability of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(2), 43-56.
Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories. Rutledge.
Nasr, M., Bagheri, M. S., sadighi, F., & Rassaei, E. (2019). Iranian EFL teachers’
assessment for learning Practices and barriers: Do textbooks taught and teaching context
matter? Cogent Arts & Humanities, 6(1), 1646691.
Nathan, M. J., & Knuth, E. J. (2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 175-207.
Oz, H. (2014). Turkish Teachers' practices of assessment for learning in English as a
foreign language classroom. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 5(4), 775-785.
Pan, Z., Wang Y., & Derakhshan A. (2023). Unpacking Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement and psychological well-being: The roles of language teachers’ affective scaffolding. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09974-z
Park, Y., Xu, Y., Collins, P., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2018). Scaffolding learning of language structures with visualsyntactic text formatting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 896–910.
Piamsai, C. (2020). The effect of scaffolding on non-proficient EFL learners’ performance in an academic writing class. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(2), 288-305.
Poehner, M.E., & Infante, P. (2016). Mediated development: A Vygotskian approach to transforming second language learner abilities. TESOL Quarterly, 51, 332–357.
Qaracholloo, M., Ghorbani, M. R., & Ghiasvand, F. (2015). The effect of various testing conditions on long-term retention of reading materials: The case of initial and delayed test types, and feedback on test. English Language Teaching, 2(1), 101-118.
Reynolds, D. (2017). Interactional scaffolding for reading comprehension: A systematic review. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66(1), 133–156.
Rezaee, A. A., Marefat, H., & Saeedakhtar, A. (2015). Symmetrical and asymmetrical scaffolding of L2 collocations in the context of concordancing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 532-549.
Rodsawang, S. S. (2017). Writing problems of EFL learners in higher education: A case
study of the Far Eastern University. FEU Academic Review, 11, 268-284.
Scheb-Buenner, P. (2013). Do scaffolding interactions exist in the Thai classroom? GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 13(3), 17-30.
Smith, H., & Higgins, S. (2006). Opening classroom interaction: The importance of feedback.
Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 485–502.
Spycher, P. (2017). Scaffolding writing through the “teaching and learning cycle”: Leading
with learning. WestEd.
Tajeddin, Z., & Kamali, J. (2020). Typology of scaffolding in teacher discourse: Large data‐based
evidence from second language classrooms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(2), 329-343.
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010 9127-6.
van Der Stuyf, R. R. (2012). Scaffolding as a teaching strategy. Adolescent Learning and Development. Section 0500A.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual
framework. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2),
-180.
Wette, R. (2014). Teacher-led collaborative modelling in academic L2 writing courses. ELT Journal, 69(1), 71–80.
Wolf, M. K., Guzman-Orth, D., Lopez, A., Castellano, K., Himelfarb, I., & Tsutagawa, F. S. (2016). Integrating scaffolding strategies into technology-enhanced assessments of English learners: Task types and measurement models. Educational Assessment, 21(3), 157–175.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V & Abrami, P.C. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173-207.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir sus trabajos electrónicamente (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su propio sitio web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, ya que puede dar lugar a intercambios productivos, así como a una citación más temprana y mayor de los trabajos publicados (Véase The Effect of Open Access) (en inglés).