Risk factors associated with witnessing cyberbullying in primary education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v28i2.25905

Keywords:

cyberbullying, school violence, primary education, multiple regression analysis

Abstract

Cyberbullying is a harmful and intentional act of an aggressor/s to a victim, through technology, which causes an imbalance of power. The role of bystanders is key for early intervention in the phenomenon. The objective of the study is to detect risk factors associated with cyberbystanders in Primary Education based on individual variables related to the use of technologies (number of technologies, type of technology, frequency, purpose of use, time slot, and place of connection) and experiences as victims or aggressors of cyberbullying. A sample of 1169 families whose children were in 5th or 6th grade of Primary Education was selected and surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire that measures all the indicated variables (α = .84). The study of the risk factors was carried out using binary logistic regression (bivariate models and multivariate model) with the software R version 4.1.0. Bivariate analyses identified: a) using a mobile phone with the Internet, b) Internet connection to talk with friends, c) cybervictimization, and d) cyberperpetration as possible individual risk factors (p < .05). The multivariate model showed joint predictors of the risk of being cyberbystanders in Primary Education: cyberperpetration, cybervictimization, number of technologies used and using the Internet to talk with friends. The interrelation between the roles of cyberbullying and the risk derived from the very frequent use of various technological devices is evidenced. Implications for educational practice are studied.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Leticia López-Castro, University of Santiago de Compostela

PhD in Education from the University of Santiago de Compostela, graduated in Psychopedagogy and graduated as a teacher, specializing in Early Childhood Education, from the same university. She carried out her doctoral thesis on cyberbullying in primary education. She has been part of the research and/or teaching team at the University of Santiago de Compostela, the International University of La Rioja, the Camilo José Cela University and the Nebrija University. Likewise, she has collaborated with Goldsmiths, University of London where she has carried out various research stays. Currently, she is a postdoctoral fellow with a Margarita Salas grant at the University of Santiago de Compostela, conducting a research stay at the Department of Psychology of the University of La Coruña and member of the Educational Psychology Research Group (GIPED).

Mónica López-Ratón, University of Santiago de Compostela

PhD in Mathematics from the University of Santiago de Compostela, graduated in Mathematics with a specialty in Statistics and Operations Research and master's degree in Biostatistics from the same university. She did her doctoral thesis on the selection of optimal cut-off points in diagnostic tests. He has been part of research groups at the University of Santiago de Compostela and participated in various research projects on ROC Curves and Generalized Additive Models (GAM) in association, prediction and classification studies, and their applications in fields such as medicine and biology. Currently, member of the Educational Psychology Research Group (GIPED).

References

Álvarez-García, D., & Núñez, J. C., & Dobarro, A., & Rodríguez, C. (2015). Factores de riesgo asociados a cibervictimización en la adolescencia. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(3), 226-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.03.002

American Educational Research Association. (2013). Prevention of bullying in schools, colleges, and universities: Research report and recommendations. Author. https://bit.ly/3gutyas

Bauman, Z. (2015). Modernidad líquida. Fondo de cultura económica.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard university press.

Cohen, S., Underwood, L. G., & Gottlieb, B. H. (Eds.). (2000). Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.001.0001

Cox, D.R. (1970). Analysis of Binary Data. Chapman and Hall.

Cuberos, R. C., Sánchez, M. C., Campos, G. G., & Ortega, F. Z. (2018). Victimización en la escuela, ocio digital e irritabilidad: análisis mediante ecuaciones estructurales. Relieve: Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 24(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.24.1.12614

Domínguez-Alonso, J., Vázquez-Varela, E., & Nuñez-Lois, S. (2017). Cyberbullying escolar: incidencia del teléfono móvil e internet en adolescentes. RELIEVE-Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 23(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.23.2.8485

Domínguez-Hernández, F., Bonell, L., & González, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of factors that moderate bystanders’ actions in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2018-4-1.

Epelde-Larrañaga, A., Estrada-Vidal, L.I., & Chacón-Borrego, F. (2022). Factores predictivos en el perfil de los jóvenes que interactúan en una situación de acoso en entornos escolares. European Scientific Journal, 18(5), 117. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2022.v18n5p117

Estévez, E., Flores, E., Estévez, J.F., & Huéscar, E. (2019). Programas de intervención en acoso escolar y ciberacoso en educación secundaria con eficacia evaluada: una revisión sistemática. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 51(3), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2019.v51.n3.8

Feijóo, S., Foody, M., O’Higgins, J., Pichel, R., & Rial, A. (2021). Cyberbullies, the cyberbullied, and problematic internet use: Some reasonable similarities. Psicothema, 33(2), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.209

Garaigordobil, M. (2015). Ciberbullying en adolescentes y jóvenes del País Vasco: Cambios con la edad. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 31(3), 1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.3.179151

Garaigordobil, M., & Oñederra, J. A. (2010). La violencia entre iguales. Revisión teórica y estrategias de intervención. Pirámide.

Girón, M., Carabias, M. y Martín, A. (2021). La educación emocional como método preventivo para el acoso escolar en educación infantil: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura. REIDOCREA, 10(6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.66307

González, A. (2016). Factores de riesgo en el ciberacoso: revisión sistemática a partir del modelo del triple riesgo delictivo (TRD). Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, 22, 62–81. https://doi.org/10.7238/idp.v0i22.2971

González, V., Prendes, M.P., & López, J.A. (2016). Víctimas de ciberacoso: estudio descriptivo en la Región de Murcia. En R. Roig-Vila (Coord.), Tecnología, innovación e investigación en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje (pp. 1661-1669). Octaedro.

Guo, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the predictors of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Psychology in the Schools, 53(4), 432-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21914

Halpern, D., Piña, M., & Ortega-Gunckel, C. (2021). Mediación parental y escolar: uso de tecnologías para potenciar el rendimiento escolar. Educación XX1, 24(2), 257-282. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.28716

Holfeld, B., & Mishna, F. (2018). Longitudinal associations in youth involvement as victimized, bullying, or witnessing cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(4), 234-239. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0369

Hosmer, D., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R.X. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2022). Porcentaje de menores usuarios de TIC en 2021. https://bit.ly/3RiUuaI

Kowalski, R.M., Giumetti, G.W., Schroeder, A.N., & Lattanner, M.R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073-1137. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618

Lambe, L. J., Hudson, C. C., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (2017). Does defending come with a cost? Examining the psychosocial correlates of defending behaviour among bystanders of bullying in a Canadian sample. Child Abuse and Neglect, 65, 112-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.012

Li, B., & Babu, G.J. (2019). A graduate course on statistical inference. Springer.

Machimbarrena, J. M., González-Cabrera, J., Montiel, I., & Ortega-Barón, J. (2021). An Exploratory Analysis of Different Problematic Internet Use Profiles in Cybervictims, Cyberbullies, and Cyberbully Victims. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(10), 664-672. http://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0545

McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J.A. (1983). Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall.

McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105-142). Academic press.

McFadden, D. (2021). Quantitative methods for analysing travel behaviour of individuals: some recent developments. In D.A. Hensher and P.R. Stopher (Eds.), Behavioural Travel Modelling (pp. 279-318). Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781003156055-18

Mishna, F., Khoury-Kassabri, M., Gadalla, T., & Daciuk, J. (2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.032

Olweus, D. (1991). Victimization among school children. Advances in psychology, 76, 45-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61056-0

R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://bit.ly/3AFcE0a

Rice, E., Petering, R., Rhoades, H., Winetrobe, H., Goldbach, J., Plant, A., Montoya, J., & Kordic, T. (2015). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among middle-school students. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3), 66-72. https://doi.org/10.2105%2FAJPH.2014.302393

Ruíz-Martín, A., Bono-Cabré, R., & Magallón-Neri, E. (2019). Ciberacoso y ansiedad social en adolescentes: una revisión sistemática. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 6(1), 9–15. http://doi.org/10.21134/rpcna.2019.06.1.1

Sabater, C., & López, L. (2015). Factores de riesgo en el Ciberbullying. Frecuencia y exposición de los datos personales en Internet. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 4(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.4471/rise.2015.01

Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(3), 246-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000488

Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 22(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T

Sánchez, L., Crespo, G., Aguilar-Moya, R., Bueno-Cañigral, F. J., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., & Valderrama-Zurián, J. C. (2016). Los adolescentes y el ciberacoso. Ayuntamiento de Valencia. https://bit.ly/3Ev2zDo

Sittichai, R., & Smith, P.K. (2020). Information Technology Use and Cyberbullying Behavior in South Thailand: A Test of the Goldilocks Hypothesis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197122

Smith, P.K. (2019). Research on Cyberbullying: strengths and Limitations. In H. Vandebosch and L. Green (Eds.), Narratives in research and interventions on cyberbullying among young people (pp. 9-27). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04960-7_2

Smith, P.K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x

Stald, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2012). Twenty-Two: Mobile access: different users, different risks, different consequences?". In S. Livingstone, L. Haddon and A. Görzig (Eds.), Children, Risk and Safety on the Internet (pp. 285-296). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781847428844.ch022

Tsimtsiou, Z., Haidich, A. B., Drontsos, A., Dantsi, F., Sekeri, Z., Drosos, E., Trikilis, N., Dardavesis, T., Nanos, P., & Arvanitidou, M. (2018). Pathological Internet use, cyberbullying and mobile phone use in adolescence: a school-based study in Greece. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 30(6), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2016-0115

Published

2022-12-24

How to Cite

López-Castro, L., & López-Ratón, M. (2022). Risk factors associated with witnessing cyberbullying in primary education. RELIEVE – Electronic Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v28i2.25905

Issue

Section

Research Articles