Enfoques innovadores para el desarrollo profesional: Explorando la interacción entre el Conocimiento Pedagógico, Tecnológico y de Contenido (TPACK), la motivación del profesorado, su compromiso y el desarrollo profesional de los docentes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.viXIII.32430Palabras clave:
Desarrollo profesional, Conocimiento Pedagógico, Tecnológico y de Contenido (TPACK), Motivación del profesorado, Compromiso del profesorado, Aprendizaje potenciado por la tecnología.Resumen
Este estudio tuvo como objetivo explorar la relación entre el Conocimiento Tecnológico, Pedagógico y de Contenido (TPACK, por sus siglas en inglés) de los profesores, la motivación para la enseñanza del inglés (TEE, por sus siglas en inglés), las estrategias de compromiso en la enseñanza del inglés y el desarrollo profesional. Se recopilaron un total de 415 cuestionarios válidos de profesores de toda China, con una mayoría proveniente de la provincia de Shaanxi. Los datos se obtuvieron mediante una encuesta realizada en línea durante un período de dos semanas, y el cuestionario fue traducido y retrotraducido para garantizar la precisión lingüística. Los análisis estadísticos se realizaron utilizando SPSS (versión 27) y AMOS (versión 24), incluyendo estadísticas descriptivas, correlación, regresión y modelos de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM, por sus siglas en inglés). Los hallazgos revelaron que los profesores con niveles más altos de TPACK tenían más probabilidades de mostrar una mayor motivación para la enseñanza del inglés y adoptar estrategias de compromiso más efectivas, lo que contribuyó a su desarrollo profesional. También se encontró que el TPACK actuó como mediador entre la motivación para la enseñanza del inglés y las estrategias de compromiso en la enseñanza del inglés, destacando el papel del TPACK en la mejora del crecimiento profesional de los profesores al optimizar sus prácticas docentes. Estos resultados sugieren que fortalecer el TPACK puede influir positivamente tanto en la motivación como en el compromiso de los profesores, lo que conduce a una enseñanza más efectiva y a un avance profesional. La importancia de este estudio radica en su demostración de cómo el fortalecimiento del TPACK de los profesores puede mejorar su motivación, estrategias de compromiso y desarrollo profesional, ofreciendo ideas valiosas para programas de desarrollo profesional específicos en la enseñanza del inglés. Al destacar el papel mediador del TPACK, el estudio contribuye a una comprensión más profunda de los factores que impulsan prácticas docentes efectivas y el crecimiento de los profesores.
Descargas
Citas
Ateş, H., & Köroğlu, M. (2024). Online collaborative tools for science education: Boosting learning outcomes, motivation, and engagement. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 1052–1067. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12931
Aydin Yildiz, T. (2024). The relationship between TPACK and self-efficacy of the English teachers of gifted students in science and art centres: A sample of Türkiye. Participatory Educational Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.22.11.2
Azhar, I. N. K., & Hashim, H. (2022). Level of ESL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) skill and attitude towards technology. Creative Education, 13(04), 1193–1210. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.134074
Bullard, M. B., Rutledge, C. D., & Kohler-Evans, P. (2017). Using the stages of concern questionnaire to ensure professional development with teachers and teacher candidates. International Research in Higher Education, 2(4), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.5430/irhe.v2n4p50
Dai, K., & Wang, Y. L. (2024). Enjoyable, anxious, or bored: Investigating Chinese EFL learners’ classroom emotions and their engagement in technology-based EMI classrooms. System, 123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103339
Derakhshan, A. (2025). EFL students’ perceptions about the role of generative artificial intelligence (GAI)-mediated instruction in their emotional engagement and goal orientation: A motivational climate theory (MCT) perspective in focus. Learning and Motivation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102114
Derakhshan, A., & Fathi, J. (2024a). Grit and foreign language enjoyment as predictors of EFL learners’ online engagement: The mediating role of online learning self-efficacy. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(4), 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00745-x
Derakhshan, A., & Fathi, J. (2024b). Growth mindset and ideal L2 self as predictors of student engagement in EFL students: The mediating role of L2 grit. Porta Linguarum, 9, 69–91. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.viIX.29899
Derakhshan, A., Teo, T., & Khazaie, S. (2024). Is game-based language learning general or specific-oriented? Exploring the applicability of mobile virtual realities to medical English education in the middle east. Computers & Education, 213, 105013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105013
Derakhshan, A., Teo, T., Saeedy Robat, E., Janebi Enayat, M., & Jahanbakhsh, A. A. (2024). Robot-assisted language learning: A Meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 00346543241247227. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241247227
Derakhshan, A., & Zhang, L. J. (2024). Applications of psycho-emotional traits in technology-based Language Education (TBLE): An introduction to the special issue. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(4), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00881-y
Gao, Q., Zhang, S., Cai, Z., Liu, K., Hui, N., & Tong, M. (2022). Understanding student teachers’ collaborative problem-solving competency: Insights from process data and multidimensional item response theory. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101097. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101097
Gao, Y., Wang, Q., & Wang, X. (2024). Exploring EFL university teachers’ beliefs in integrating ChatGPT and other large language models in language education: a study in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305173
Gao, Y., Wang, X., & Reynolds, B. L. (2025). The mediating roles of resilience and flow in linking basic psychological needs to tertiary EFL learners’ engagement in the informal digital learning of English: A mixed-methods study. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010085
Guo, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). Exploring the effects of artificial intelligence application on EFL students' academic engagement and emotional experiences: A mixed‐methods study. European Journal of Education, e12812. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12812
Jin, F., Song, Z., Cheung, W. M., Lin, C.-H., & Liu, T. (2024). Technological affordances in teachers' online professional learning communities: A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 1019–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12935
Johnson-Smith, T. R. (2014). Student engagement and academic achievement in technology enhanced and traditional classroom environments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Liberty University.
https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/889
Joldanova, D., Tleuzhanova, G., Kitibayeva, A., Smanova, G., & Mirza, N. (2022). Formation of TPACK and acmeological competency of future teachers in foreign language education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(4), 935–954. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2717
Kholid, M. N., Hendriyanto, A., Sahara, S., Muhaimin, L. H., Juandi, D., Sujadi, I., Kuncoro, K. S., & Adnan, M. (2023). A systematic literature review of Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in mathematics education: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2269047. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2269047
Huang, F., Wang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2024). Modeling generative AI acceptance, perceived teachers’ enthusiasm, and self-efficacy to English as foreign language learners’ well-being in the digital era. European Journal of Education, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12770
Lan, Y. (2024). Through tensions to identity-based motivations: Exploring teacher professional identity in Artificial Intelligence-enhanced teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 151, 104736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104736
Leibovitch, Y. M., Beencke, A., Ellerton, P. J., McBrien, C., Robinson-Taylor, C.-L., & Brown, D. J. (2025). Teachers’ (evolving) beliefs about critical thinking education during professional learning: A multi- case study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, 101725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101725
Li, Y., & Wang, X. (2024). The emergence of loving pedagogy in the L2 affective domain: How affective pedagogy accounts for Chinese EFL teachers’ professional success and job satisfaction? International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 26(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.32604/ijmhp.2023.029611
Liang, J.-C., Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Yang, C.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Surveying in-service preschool teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 581–594. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.299
Ma, D., & Wang, Y. (2024). Does the work environment matter in shaping English as a foreign language teachers’ teaching for creativity: A mixed‐methods investigation into the roles of perceived climate, peer group interaction, and supervisory relationship. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12624
Mohammadi, G. (2024). Teachers’ CALL professional development in synchronous, asynchronous, and bichronous online learning through project-oriented tasks: developing CALL pedagogical knowledge. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(2), 401-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00260-4
Qi, S., & Derakhshan, A. (2025). Technology-based collaborative learning: EFL learners’ social regulation and modifications in their academic emotions and academic performance. Education and Information Technologies, 30(7), 8611–8636. .https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13167-z
Qu, J., & Wang, Y. L. (2024). Modelling the interaction between EFL teachers’ personality traits, emotion-regulation strategies, and teachers’ depression: A structural equation approach. European Journal of Education, e12727. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12727
Su, F., Zou, D., & Wang, L. (2023). Learning-by-doing in a professional learning community: Technological pedagogical and content knowledge development of Hong Kong university teaching staff. Asia Pacific Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09918-1
Sui, C.-J., Yen, M.-H., & Chang, C.-Y. (2024). Investigating effects of perceived technology-enhanced environment on self-regulated learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12270-x
Tan, X., Cheng, G., & Ling, M. H. (2024). Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355
Wang, Q., Sun, F., Wang, X., & Gao, Y. (2023). Exploring undergraduate students’ digital multitasking in class: An empirical study in China. Sustainability, 15(13), 10184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310184
Wang, Y. L. & Xue, L. N. (2024). Using AI-driven chatbots to foster Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement: An intervention study. Computers in Human Behavior, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108353
Wu, H., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). “To use or not to use?” A mixed-methods study on the determinants of EFL college learners’ behavioral intention to use AI in the distributed learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7708
Xin, Z., & Derakhshan, A. (2025). From excitement to anxiety: Exploring EFL learners’ emotional experiences in the AI-powered classrooms. European Journal of Education, 60(1). e12845 https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12845
Yildiz, E., & Arpaci, I. (2024). Understanding pre-service mathematics teachers’ intentions to use GeoGebra: The role of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 29(14), 18817–18838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12614-1
Yim, I. H. Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy in primary education: An arts-based approach to overcoming age and gender barriers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100321
Zeng, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, S. (2022). The relationship between teachers' information technology integration self-efficacy and TPACK: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1091017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1091017
FUNDING INFORMATION
General Project of the “14th Five-Year Plan” for Education Science in Shaanxi Province in 2024 (Grant Numbers: SGH24Y2792, SGH24Y2782); 2024 Annual Planning Project of The China Association for Non-Government Education (School Development Category) (Grant Number: CANFZG24095).
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Shuhan Liu

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.