The –s morpheme in CLIL and EFL: DP structure and time/untimed tasks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi43.30409Keywords:
CLIL, EFL, -s morpheme, timed/untimed tasks, DP structureAbstract
This study investigated whether type of instruction (CLIL versus EFL) and different amount of exposure have any effect on the comprehension and written production of the English 3rd person singular –s morpheme. Furthermore, it examined whether separation of the head noun determining number and person agreement from abstract should be in the language chosen to write the manuscript. Tense might be a variable that could affect the comprehension of that morpheme. Twenty-six Spanish EFL learners (age range 15-16) completed an Acceptability Judgment Task and a Fill-in the Gaps Task in a timed and untimed mode. Contrary to expectations, no significant differences were found between the two groups in the four tasks. Moreover, results seemed to suggest that EFL learners performed better overall than their counterparts. Finally, the hypothesis that the separation of the head noun from Tense could be a factor playing a role in the comprehension of the –s morpheme was partially confirmed.
Downloads
References
Alonso Pena, C., & Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2020). Effects of focus on form on primary CLIL students’ foreign language performance in task-based oral interaction. Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language Education, 8, 53-79. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.17028.alf
Basterrechea, M., & García Mayo, M.P. (2014). Dictogloss and the production of the English third person –s by CLIL and mainstream learners: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies, 14(2), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.6018/j.177321
Brown, R. 1973. A first language: The early stages. George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Coyle, D. (2007). The CLIL quality challenge. In D. Marsh, & D. Wolff (Eds.), Diverse contexts-converging goals. CLIL in Europe (pp. 47-58). Peter Lang.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. John Benjamins.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011. Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204.
Dulay, H. C., & M. K. Burt. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23, 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1973.tb00659.x
Ellis, R. (2009a). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders. Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3-25). Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R. (2009b). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders. Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 31-64). Multilingual Matters.
Eurydice. (2006). Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe.Eurydice European Unit.
García Mayo, M.P., & Villarreal Olaizola, I. (2011). The development of suppletive and affixal tense and agreement morphemes in the L3 English of Basque-Spanish bilinguals. Second Language Research 27(1), 129-149.
https://doi.org/10.1177/026765831038652
García Mayo, M.P., A. Lázaro Ibarrola, & J.M. Liceras. (2005). Place holders in the English interlanguage of bilingual (Basque/Spanish) children. Language Learning 55(3),445-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00312.x
Goldschneider, J. M., & R. M. DeKeyser. (2001). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 55, 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147
Hawkins, R., & G. Casillas. (2008). Explaining frequency of verb morphology in early L2 speech. Lingua, 118, 595-612.
Hüttner, J., & Rieder-Bünemann, A. (2010). A cross-sectional analysis of oral narratives by children with CLIL and non-CLIL instruction. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 61-104). John Benjamins.
Ionin, T. (2012). Formal theory-based methodologies. In A. Mackey, & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 30-52). Wiley-Blackwell.
Järvinen, H. M. (2010). Language as a meaning making resource in learning and teaching content: Analysing historical writing in content and language integrated learning. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 145-168). John Benjamins.
Kenny, N., & Luque-Mortimer, L. (2004). First certificate practice tests: Plus 1. Pearson Education Limited.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.). Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press.
Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. (2011). How languages are learned. Oxford University Press.
Luk, Z.P., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural –s, articles, and possessive’s. Language Learning 59, 721-754
1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00524.x
Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content. A counterbalanced approach. John Benjamins.
Martínez Adrián, M., & Gutiérrez Mangado, M.J. (2009). The acquisition of English syntax by CLIL learners in the Basque Country. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, & R. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.) Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 176-196). Multilingual Matters.
Martínez Adrián, M. & Gutierrez Mangado, M. J. (2015). Is CLIL instruction beneficial both in terms of general proficiency and specific areas of grammar? Journal ofImmersion and Content-Based Language Education 3, 51-76 https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.1.03adr
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? Dial Books for Young Readers.
McKeegan, D. (2004). First certificate Passkey. Grammar section. Macmillan Heinemann ELT.
Murakami, A., & Alexopoulou, T. (2015). L1 influence on the acquisition order of English grammatical morphemes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 365-401. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000352
Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U. (Eds.). (2016). Conceptualizing integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Multilingual Matters.
Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15, 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
Pérez Cañado, M.L. (2023). Inclusion and diversity in bilingual education. A European comparative study. International Journal of Bilingualism and Bilingualism, 26, 1129-1145 https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.2013770
San Isidro, X., & Calvo, E. (2012). The fusion effect of CLIL on language-building and content-learning: A research study. In D. Marsh, & O. Meyer (Eds.) Quality interfaces: Examining evidence & exploring solutions in CLIL (pp. 103-140). Eichstaett Academic Press.
Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.). Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 375-409). Academic Press.
Sydicate, U.C.L.E. (2001). Quick placement test. Oxford University Press.
Villarreal Olaizola, I., & García Mayo, M.P. (2009). Tense and agreement morphology in the interlanguage of Basque/Spanish bilinguals: CLIL vs. non-CLIL.In Y. Ruiz Zarobe & R. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.). Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 157-175). Multilingual Matters.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain copyright and guarantee to the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately enter into additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).