A cross-sectional investigation of the use of modal verbs in Chinese EFL learners’ English writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi40.22259Keywords:
Modal verbs; corpus; cross-sectional; academic writing; the China’s Standards of English Language Ability (CSE)Abstract
This study, based on a corpus of Chinese EFL learners’ writing, has investigated their use of modal verbs at levels 1 to 7 according to the China’s Standards of English Language Ability (CSE). The results of quantitative and qualitative analyses indicate that: 1) Chinese EFL learners at CSE levels 1-7 use more modal verbs in writing than native learners in MICUSP; 2) they consistently overuse CAN, WILL and SHOULD but underuse WOULD in their writing across levels; 3) salient forms and fundamental senses of modal verbs are the most recurrent in writing at CSE 1 to 3 levels and learners’ use becomes more productive and variant at higher levels; and 4) form-meaning pairs seem to exist--the past affirmative and negative forms and their associated senses are rare in Chinese learners’ writing. Cross-register variation and structure complexity may account for the absence of some modal verb forms in learners’ writing.
Downloads
References
Aijmer, K. (2002). Modality in advanced Swedish learners' written interlanguage. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 55-76). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Axel-Tober, K. & Gergel, R. (2016). Modality and mood in formal syntactic approaches. In J. Nuyts & J. Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp. 495-513). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Bowie, J. S. W. & Aarts, B. (2013). Contemporary change in modal usage in spoken British English: Mapping the impact of genre. In J. M. Carretero, J. A. Hita & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality (pp. 57–94). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.
Boyd, J. K., & Goldberg, A. E. (2009). Input effects within a constructionist framework. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 418-429. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00899.x
Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2014). Cross-cultural variation in the use of modal verbs in academic English. Sky Journal of Linguistics, 27(1), 153-166. http://www.linguistics.fi/julkaisut/SKY2014/Carrio-Pastor.pdf
Coates, J. (2014). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Routledge.
Collins, P. (2009). Modals and quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Crawford W. (2005). Is L2 writing like native-English conversation? Paper presented at ICAME 26, University of Michigan. https://scholar.google.co.kr/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=ko&user=OSSsVMUAAAAJ&citation_for_view=OSSsVMUAAAAJ:9yKSN-GCB0IC
Dunlea, J., Spiby, R., Wu, S., Zhang, J. & Cheng, M. (2019). China’s standards of English language ability (CSE): Linking UK exams to the CSE. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/linking_cse_to_uk_exams_5_0.pdf
Elturki, E. & Salsbury, T. (2016). A cross-sectional investigation of the development of modality in English language learners’ writing: A corpus-driven study. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 51-72. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/19z4h5h0
Fujimoto, K. (2019). Epistemic modal verbs and adverbs in Japanese university students’ academic writing. Paper presented at International Corpus Linguistic Conference (CL2019). https://researchmap.jp/read0127473/presentations
Gao, X. (2020). A comparable-corpus-based study of modal verbs in Chinese and western scholars’ English research articles. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 43, 1-9. https://d.buaa.edu.cn/https/77726476706e69737468656265737421fbf952d2243e635930068cb8/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2020&filename=JFJW202005001&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=KIpNw_Wv2cmxa0-0g8IQtsCWOic2na97OMFqQO-h_L7z7eCOwmOKaKJ3HUn6_yRF
Gilquin, G. & Paquot, M. (2007). Spoken features in learner academic writing: Identification, explanation and solution. Proceedings of the 4th corpus linguistics conference, University of Birmingham. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/documents/college-artslaw/corpus/conference-archives/2007/204Paper.pdf
Gotti, M. (2003). Shall and will in contemporary English: a comparison with past uses. In M. G. K. Facchinetti & F. R. Palmer (Eds.), Modality in contemporary English (pp. 267-300). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hinkel, E. (2009). The effects of essay topics on modal verb uses in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 667–683. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216608002403
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183-205.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1060374397900333
Ishii, Y. (2018). Investigating the frequency and dispersion of English grammatical items in textbooks and learner corpora: For more informed ELT practice. https://researchmap.jp/read0139137/presentations/5920518.
Kim, C. & Suh, H. (2014). Epistemic rhetorical stance: Hedges and boosters in L1 and L2 students’ English writing. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 22(2), 61-93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301204381_Epistemic_Rhetorical_Stance_Hedges_and_Boosters_in_L1_and_L2_Students%27_English_Writing
Knight, D. (2015). E-language: Communication in the digital age. In P. Baker & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora (pp. 20–40). Palgrave Macmillan: London.
Leech, G. N. (2003). Modality on the move: the English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992. In M. G. K. Facchinetti & F. R. Palmer (Eds.), Modality in contemporary English (pp. 223-240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ma, G. & Lv, X. (2007). The analysis on modal verbs–based on Chinese learner English corpus ST6. CAFLE, 115(6), 17-21. https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=67594a0fb61212b568b2fc0845d1ed61&site=xueshu_se
McDorman, R. (2020). The expressive power of modal verbs and why ESL and EFL students avoid them. https://eflmagazine.com/the-expressive-power-of-modal-verbs-and-why-esl-a nd-efl-students-avoid-them/.
McEnery, T. & Kifle, N. (2002). Epistemic modality in argumentative essays of second-language writers. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 182–195). London: Longman, Pearson Education.
Milton, J. & Hyland, K. (1999). Assertions in students’ academic essays: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers. In R. Berry, B. Asker, K. Hyland, & M. Lam (Eds.), Language analysis, description and pedagogy (pp. 147-161). Hong Kong: HKUST.
Ministry of Education of China. (2018). China’s standards of English language ability. http://cse.neea.edu.cn/html1/folder/1505/249-1.htm
Mitkovska, L., Bužarovska, E. & Kusevska, M. (2012). Corpus evidence for the acquisition of modal verbs of obligation by Macedonian Learners of English. 7th ELTAM-IATEFL-TESOL conference: Continuing professional development-opportunities and challenges, 27-28 Oct 2012, Skopje, Macedonia. https://www.academia.edu/17762114/Corpus_evidence_for_the_acquisition_of_modal_verbs_of_obligation_by_Macedonian_Learners_of_English
O’Keeffe, A. & Mark, G. (2017). The English grammar profile of learner competence: Methodology and key findings. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(4), 457-489. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321442237_The_English_Grammar_Profile_of_learner_competence_Methodology_and_key_findings
Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pemberton, C. (2020). In my opinion: Modality in Japanese EFL learners’ argumentative essays. Asian Pacific Journal of Corpus Research, 1(2), 57-72. http://www.icr.or.kr/journal/1022925APJCR20201257.pdf?ckattempt=1
Portner, P. (2009). Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Römer, U. & Swales, J. (2010). The Michigan corpus of upper-level student papers (MICUSP). Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 249. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248617132_The_Michigan_Corpus_of_Upper-level_Student_Papers_MICUSP
Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith tools 5.0. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
Stewart, M. (2005). Politeness in Britain: “It’s only a suggestion...” In L. Hickey & Stewart, M. (Eds.), Politeness in Europe (pp. 116-129). Clevedon, England, and Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
Xiao, Y. (2017). Chinese ELF learners’ acquisition of modal verbs: A corpus-based study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(6), 164-170. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320079929_Chinese_ELF_Learners%27_Acquisition_of_Modal_Verbs_A_Corpus-Based_Study
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain copyright and guarantee to the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately enter into additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
