Dictogloss or Processing Instruction: Which Works Better on EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy?

Authors

  • Yasaman Azmoon Islamic Azad University at Central Tehran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi36.20909

Keywords:

Dictogloss, Processing instruction, Structured input activities, Writing accuracy, Elementary EFL Students

Abstract

Although many investigations have been carried out into the consequence of applying different approaches to teaching writing, there is still a lack of the empirical comparing research into two influential focus-on-form methods of generating writing accuracy. This study is therefore significant as it is the very first study that compares the relative effects of the two instructional interventions of dictogloss and processing instruction on EFL learners’ writing accuracy. To achieve the abovementioned aim, 56 teenage Iranian participants with elementary level English were homogenized and selected out of 90 learners at a language school, using the results of a piloted sample Key English Test (KET). These participants were randomly divided into two experimental groups with 28 participants in each to practice in one group dictogloss tasks and in the other processing instruction tasks after a pretest. A picture sequence writing task was administered as a posttest at the end of the treatments to both groups. Finally the mean scores of both groups on the posttest were compared through an independent samples t-test. The result rejected the null hypothesis demonstrating that dictogloss could significantly motivate the participants who outperformed the processing instruction group regarding their writing accuracy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Yasaman Azmoon, Islamic Azad University at Central Tehran

Yasaman Azmoon, who started learning English when she was eleven years old, holds different English certificates such as advanced level from NIEL institute, academic IELTS with band score 7, and an MA in TEFL from Islamic Azad University at Central Tehran and has been teaching English at different language schools since 2010. Her main area of research interest includes methods and techniques of language teaching.

References

Abbasian, G. R., & Minagar, N. (2012). PI-based vs. DG-oriented instruction in developing grammar ability and motivation of EFL learners. The Iranian EFL Journal, 8, 94-112.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Harris, D. (1965). Testing English as a second language. Oxford University.

Hashemnezhad, H., & Khalili Zangalani, S. (2012). The effects of processing instruction and traditional instruction on Iranian EFL learners’ writing ability. English Language Teaching, 5, 125-135. doi:10.5539/elt.v5n11p125

Jacobs, G., & Small, J. (2003). Combining dictogloss and cooperative learning to promote language learning. The Reading Matrix 3(1), 1-5.

Kondo, M., Sano, R., Tashiro, A., Noguchi, Y., Kogure, S., Konishi, T., & Itoh, Y. (2010). Development of a dictogloss system oriented for focus on form. Proceedings of ICCE 2010 (pp. 1-16).

Kooshafar, M., Youhanaee, M., & Amirian, Z. (2012). The effect of dictogloss technique on learners’ writing improvement in terms of writing coherent texts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3, 716-721. doi:10.4304/jltr.3.4.716-721

Lee, J. F. & Benati, A. G. (2009). Research and perspectives on processing instruction. Berlin: the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek.

Lee, J. F., & Vanpatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Modirkhamene, S., Pouyan, A., & Alavinia, P. (2018). Processing instruction: Learning complex grammar and writing accuracy through structured input activities. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 177-188. doi: 10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11479.

Morales, J. L., Myers, C., & Lynam, D. (2009). Hey there 1. Longman-Pearson.

Morgan-Short, K., & Bowden, H. (2006). Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 31-65. doi: 10.1017/S0272263106060025.

Nguyen, H. (2017). Does dictogloss improve non-English major students’ motivation and grammatical competence? Language education in Asia, 8(1), 84-108. doi:10.5746/LEiA/17/V8/I1/A06/Nguyen.

Nosratinia, M., & Razavi, F. (2016). Writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency among EFL learners: Inspecting their interaction with learners’ degree of creativity. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6, 1043-1052.

Onovughe, O. G., & Olubunmi, O. T. (2018). Dictogloss strategy and listening comprehension performance of secondary school students. International Journal of Education and Research, 6, 225-236.

Pertiwi, D., Ngadiso, & Drajati, N. A. (2018). The effect of dictogloss technique on the students’ writing skill. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(2), 279-293.

Qin, J. (2008). The effect of processing instruction and dictogloss tasks on acquisition of the English passive voice. Sage Publications, 12, 61-82. doi: 10.1177/1362168807084494.

Rashtchi. M., & Khosroabadi. P. (2009). The comparative effect of explicit focus on form and dictogloss task on learning English tenses. JELS, 1, 101-114.

Smith, K. M. (2011). Dictogloss: A multi-skill task for accuracy in writing through cooperative learning. Teachers Helping Teachers, 69-80.

Vanpatten, B. (Ed.). (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Second Language Acquisition Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Association.

Wajnryb, R. (1995). Grammar dictation. Oxford University.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-25

How to Cite

Azmoon, Y. (2021). Dictogloss or Processing Instruction: Which Works Better on EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy?. Porta Linguarum An International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, (36), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi36.20909

Issue

Section

Articles