El morfema –s en AICLE e ILE: La estructura de la DP y las tareas con/sin límite de tiempo

Jasna Toquero Unanue; María del Pilar García-Mayo

doi:10.30827/portalin.vi43.30409

Autores/as

Jasna Toquero Unanue Ekialdea State High School https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3464-9493
María del Pilar García-Mayo University of the Basque Country/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1987-4889

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi43.30409

Palabras clave:

AICLE, ILE, morfema –s, tareas con/sin tiempo, estructura de la FD

Resumen

Este trabajo investigó si el tipo de instrucción (AICLE versus ILE) y la cantidad de exposición a la lengua extranjera tienen algún efecto en la comprensión y la producción escrita del morfema de tercera persona de singular en inglés (-s). Además, también estudió si la separación del núcleo del sintagma nominal (que determina la concordancia de número y persona) de la categoría Tiempo podría ser una variable que afecte la comprensión de dicho morfema. Veintiséis aprendices de ILE (entre 15-16 años) completaron una tarea de juicio de aceptabilidad y otra de rellenar el huecos con y sin límite de tiempo. A diferencia de lo que se esperaba, no hubo diferencias significativas entre los dos grupos en ninguna de las tareas. Además, los resultados parecen indicar que el alumnado ILE obtuvo resultados generales mejores que el alumnado AICLE. Finalmente, se confirmó parcialmente la hipótesis de que la separación entre el núcleo y Tiempo tiene importancia en la comprensión del morfema –s.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Jasna Toquero Unanue, Ekialdea State High School

She holds a BA in English Philology from the University of the Basque Country (2012), as well as an MA in Teacher Training in Compulsory/Post-Compulsory Secondary Education, Vocational Training and Official School of Languages (2014) and an MA in Language Acquisition in Multilingual Settings (2016) from the same university. In 2018 she became a civil servant. Since then, she has been working as an English teacher at Ekialdea state high school.

María del Pilar García-Mayo, University of the Basque Country/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

I am a Full Professor of English Language and Linguistics in the Department of English and German Philology at the University of the Basque Country, of which I am currently the Head. I hold a B.A. in Germanic Philology from the Universidad de Santiago de Compostela and an M.A. (TESOL and Linguistics) and a Ph.D. in Linguistics from the University of Iowa (thesis: On certain null operator constructions in English and Spanish). I have been an invited speaker to universities in Germany, Greece, Norway, Spain, Sweden, The Netherlands, the UK and the USA. Most of my published work has been on the L2/L3 acquisition of English morphosyntax (generative perspective) and the study of conversational interaction and L2 learning (interactionist approach). I am also interested in bilingual/multilingual education and the age factor. I have supervised fifteen Ph.D. dissertations (all of them with the highest distinction and six awarded 'Extraordinary Ph.D. Prize') and ten more are in progress. I have also served in numerous national and international Ph.D., MA and promotion committees. Since September 2018, I am co-editor of the journal Language Teaching Research (Sage- Q1).

My teaching includes undergraduate courses on English syntax and an MA course on the acquisition of morphosyntax in the MA program in Language Acquisition in Multilingual Settings (LAMS) at the UPV/EHU. I have been awarded the UPV/EHU's prize for excellence in teaching.

Since 2007 I have been the director of the research group Language and Speech (www.laslab.org), noted by the Basque Govermentfor excellence in research in the field. I belong to the Editorial Board of the volumes EUROSLA Yearbook and Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics and those of the journals Language Teaching for Young Learners and Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism (all of them published by John Benjamins), the Continuum series on Instructed Second Language Research, European Journal of Applied Linguistics (EuJAL) - De Gruyter- and VIAL (Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics). I am also a reviewer for all the major journals in the SLA field.

Since 2009 I have been the director of the MA program Language Acquisition in Multilingual Settings (http://www.ehu.eus/en/web/lams/aurkezpena) with access to doctoral studies (Ph.D.). The Ph.D. program has been awarded Distinction of Excellence by the Spanish Ministry of Education. I was also the International Relations representative of the Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics (AESLA) and a member of the AILA (International Association of Applied Linguistics) Executive Board - International Committee (EBIC) (2011-2017). I am also an assessor for ANEP (Spanish Evaluation and Foresight Agency) and ANECA (Spanish National Agency of Quality Evaluation and Accreditation). From 2016 to 2018 I was the coordinator of the Modern Languages section in the Spanish Research Agency and from 2018 to July 2019 the coordinator of the Language and Linguistics area for the same agency. I am an Honorary Consultant for the Shanghai Center for Research in English Language Education (SCRELE).

Citas

Alonso Pena, C., & Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2020). Effects of focus on form on primary CLIL students’ foreign language performance in task-based oral interaction. Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language Education, 8, 53-79. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.17028.alf

Basterrechea, M., & García Mayo, M.P. (2014). Dictogloss and the production of the English third person –s by CLIL and mainstream learners: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies, 14(2), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.6018/j.177321

Brown, R. 1973. A first language: The early stages. George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Coyle, D. (2007). The CLIL quality challenge. In D. Marsh, & D. Wolff (Eds.), Diverse contexts-converging goals. CLIL in Europe (pp. 47-58). Peter Lang.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. John Benjamins.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011. Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204.

Dulay, H. C., & M. K. Burt. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23, 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1973.tb00659.x

Ellis, R. (2009a). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders. Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3-25). Multilingual Matters.

Ellis, R. (2009b). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders. Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 31-64). Multilingual Matters.

Eurydice. (2006). Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe.Eurydice European Unit.

García Mayo, M.P., & Villarreal Olaizola, I. (2011). The development of suppletive and affixal tense and agreement morphemes in the L3 English of Basque-Spanish bilinguals. Second Language Research 27(1), 129-149.

https://doi.org/10.1177/026765831038652

García Mayo, M.P., A. Lázaro Ibarrola, & J.M. Liceras. (2005). Place holders in the English interlanguage of bilingual (Basque/Spanish) children. Language Learning 55(3),445-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00312.x

Goldschneider, J. M., & R. M. DeKeyser. (2001). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 55, 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147

Hawkins, R., & G. Casillas. (2008). Explaining frequency of verb morphology in early L2 speech. Lingua, 118, 595-612.

Hüttner, J., & Rieder-Bünemann, A. (2010). A cross-sectional analysis of oral narratives by children with CLIL and non-CLIL instruction. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 61-104). John Benjamins.

Ionin, T. (2012). Formal theory-based methodologies. In A. Mackey, & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 30-52). Wiley-Blackwell.

Järvinen, H. M. (2010). Language as a meaning making resource in learning and teaching content: Analysing historical writing in content and language integrated learning. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 145-168). John Benjamins.

Kenny, N., & Luque-Mortimer, L. (2004). First certificate practice tests: Plus 1. Pearson Education Limited.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.). Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press.

Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. (2011). How languages are learned. Oxford University Press.

Luk, Z.P., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural –s, articles, and possessive’s. Language Learning 59, 721-754

1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00524.x

Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content. A counterbalanced approach. John Benjamins.

Martínez Adrián, M., & Gutiérrez Mangado, M.J. (2009). The acquisition of English syntax by CLIL learners in the Basque Country. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, & R. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.) Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 176-196). Multilingual Matters.

Martínez Adrián, M. & Gutierrez Mangado, M. J. (2015). Is CLIL instruction beneficial both in terms of general proficiency and specific areas of grammar? Journal ofImmersion and Content-Based Language Education 3, 51-76 https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.1.03adr

Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? Dial Books for Young Readers.

McKeegan, D. (2004). First certificate Passkey. Grammar section. Macmillan Heinemann ELT.

Murakami, A., & Alexopoulou, T. (2015). L1 influence on the acquisition order of English grammatical morphemes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 365-401. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000352

Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U. (Eds.). (2016). Conceptualizing integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Multilingual Matters.

Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15, 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064

Pérez Cañado, M.L. (2023). Inclusion and diversity in bilingual education. A European comparative study. International Journal of Bilingualism and Bilingualism, 26, 1129-1145 https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.2013770

San Isidro, X., & Calvo, E. (2012). The fusion effect of CLIL on language-building and content-learning: A research study. In D. Marsh, & O. Meyer (Eds.) Quality interfaces: Examining evidence & exploring solutions in CLIL (pp. 103-140). Eichstaett Academic Press.

Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.). Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 375-409). Academic Press.

Sydicate, U.C.L.E. (2001). Quick placement test. Oxford University Press.

Villarreal Olaizola, I., & García Mayo, M.P. (2009). Tense and agreement morphology in the interlanguage of Basque/Spanish bilinguals: CLIL vs. non-CLIL.In Y. Ruiz Zarobe & R. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.). Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 157-175). Multilingual Matters.