Examining the relative effectiveness of online, blended and face-to-face teaching modes for promoting EFL teacher professional development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi2023c.29619Keywords:
online teaching, blended teaching, face-to-face teaching, teacher professional development, English as a foreign language (EFL)Abstract
Teacher professional development (PD) is an essential part for teachers’ professional growth for the quality provision of education to their students. Nonetheless, we need to find out effective ways of professional development. This study was conducted to achieve this goal by exploring the effectiveness of three teaching modes, online, blended, and face-to-face delivery, of an EFL course in a Chinese university, with the ultimate aim of promoting their PD. Three intact English classes were treated differently with Class 1 receiving online teaching, Class 2 receiving blended teaching, and Class 3 receiving face-to-face teaching. Their learning outcome was measured by an end-of-semester test. One-way ANOVA results showed that the face-to-face (onsite) teaching class performed significantly better than the other two classes. Focus group interviews of students revealed more drawbacks of online teaching than benefits. The findings suggest that online teaching, as a new teaching mode that has gained popularity due to the pandemic, cannot replace face-to-face teaching in terms of students’ learning outcomes and their perceptions toward online teaching currently. Such findings provide food for thought for EFL teachers with regard to their own professional development.
Downloads
References
Almahasees, Z., Mohsen, K., & Amin, M. O. (2021). Faculty’s and students’ perceptions of online learning during covid-19. Frontiers in Education, 6, 638470. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.638470
AlShahrani, F., Talaue, G.M. (2018). Traditional versus blended learning method: A comparative study on its effectiveness in business communication course. International Journal of Advanced Information Technology, 8 (6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijait.2018.8601
Alshawish, E., El-Banna, M. M., & Alrimawi, I. (2021). Comparison of blended versus traditional classrooms among undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 106,105049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105049
Anthony, B. Jr., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. L. E., Abdullah, A., et al. (2019). Exploring the role of blended learning for teaching and learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning: an empirical investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 3433–3466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09941-z
Atwa, H, Shehata, MH, Al-Ansari, A, Kumar, A, Jaradat, A, Ahmed J and Deifalla A. (2022). Online, face-to-face, or blended learning? Faculty and medical students’ perceptions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-method study. Frontiers in Medicine, 9:791352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.791352
Blau, G., Drennan, R. (2017). Exploring differences in business undergraduate perceptions by preferred classroom delivery mode. Online Learning, 21(3), 222–234.
Caruso, M., Gadd Colombi, A., & Tebbit, S. (2017). Teaching how to Listen: Blended learning for the development and assessment of listening skills in a second language. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.14.1.7
Cheung, A. (2021). Synchronous online teaching, a blessing or a curse? Insights from EFL primary students’ interaction during online English lessons. System, 100, 102566. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.system.2021.102566
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davis, F.D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dong, C., Cao, S., & Li, H. (2020). Young children’s online learning during covid-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105440
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
Du, X., & Jia, Li. (2020). Correlation analysis of middle school students’ self-efficacy and online learning burnout during the period of suspension of classes and non-stop. Mental Health Education in Primary and Secondary School, 11, 44–46.
Gao, L.X., & Zhang, L.J. (2020). Teacher learning in difficult times: Examining foreign language teachers’ cognitions about online teaching to tide over COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(49653), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.549653
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2005). Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In D. B. A. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Information Science and Technology (pp. 253–259). Idea Group. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-553-5.ch047
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., Aston, R. (2015). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579 https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
Ho, V. T., Nakamori, Y., Ho, T. B., & Lim, C. P. (2016). Blended learning model on hands-on approach for in-service secondary school teachers: Combination of e-learning and face-to-face discussion. Education & Information Technologies, 21(1), 185-208. Doi:10.1007/s10639-014-9315-y
Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., Lu, J., & Wang Y. (2021). The effect of the online and offline blended teaching mode on English as a foreign language learners’ listening performance in a Chinese context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 742742. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742742
Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3402/ rlt. v23.26507
Kazakoff, E. R., Macaruso, P., and Hook, P. (2018). Efficacy of a blended learning approach to elementary school reading instruction for students who are English learners. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9565-7
Khatak, S., & Wadhwa, N. (2020). Online versus offline mode of education –is India ready to meet the challenges of online education in lockdown? Journal of the Social Sciences, 48(3), 404–413.
Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713
Larson, D. K., & Sung, C. H. (2019). Comparing student performance: online versus blended versus face-to-face. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13, 31–42. Doi: 10.24059/OLJ.V13I1.1675
Liu, H., Zhu, J., Duan, Y., Nie, Y., Deng, Z., & Hong, X., et al. (2022). Development and students’ evaluation of a blended online and offline pedagogy for physical education theory curriculum in China during the covid-19 pandemic. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10131-x
Lord, G., & Lomicka, L. L. (2004). Developing collaborative cyber communities to prepare tomorrow’s teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 37(3), 401–408. Doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720. 2004.tb02698.x
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2019). The “6-Excellent and 1-Top” education plan. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/moe_1485/201904/t20190429_380009.html
Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010). Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.03.006
Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mumtaz, S. (2001). Children’s enjoyment and perception of computer use in the home and the school. Computers & Education, 36, 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1315 (01)00023-9
Muthuprasad., T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101
Owston, R., York, D., Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The Internet & Higher Education, 18, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003
Paul, B., & Tenzin, D. (2018). Blended learning and traditional learning: a comparative study of college mechanics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2889–2900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9748-9
Pei, L., & Wu, H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1666538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538
Richards, J. C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal, 46(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214561621
Rusanganwa, J. (2013). Multimedia as a means to enhance teaching technical vocabulary to physics undergraduates in Rwanda. English for Specific Purposes, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.07.002
Shonfeld, M., & Ronen, I. (2015). Online learning for students from diverse backgrounds: Learning disability students, excellent students and average students. IAFOR Journal of Education, 3(2), 13–29.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Wiley.
Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00177
Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2022). Teaching and learning languages online: Challenges and responses. System, 107, 102819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102819
Torres-Vallejos, J., Juarros-Basterretxea, J., Oyanedel, J.C., & Sato, M. (2021). A bifactor model of subjective well-being at personal, community, and country levels: A case with three Latin-American countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 641641. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641641
Yan, L., Du, Y., Yu, Z., & Zhao, M. (2020). Survey on the psychological status of primary school pupils in online learning during the pandemic. Mental Health Education for Primary and Secondary Schools, 18, 11–14.
Yen, S. C., Lo, Y., Lee, A., and Enriquez, J. M. (2018). Learning online, offline, and in-between: comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities. Education and Information Technology, 23, 2141–2153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9707-5
Wang, Z., Jiang, Q., & Li, Z. (2022). How to promote online education through educational software: An analytical study of factor analysis and structural equation modelling with Chinese users as an example. Systems, 10, 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10040100
White, C. (2017). Distance language teaching with technology. In C. Chapelle, & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 135–148). Wiley & Sons.
Wut, TM., & Xu, J. (2021). Person-to-person interactions in online classroom settings under the impact of COVID-19: A social presence theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22, 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09673-1
Zhou, C. (2018). Empirical study on the effectiveness of teaching model of college English writing within blended learning mode. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.5.009
Zhang, J., Dai, Y., & Zhao, F. (2022). Comparative Study on Online and Offline Teaching for Creative Idea Generation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 872099. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872099
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain copyright and guarantee to the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately enter into additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
