Influence of teachers' linguistic competence on the implementation of CLIL in Physical Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.viVII.29170Keywords:
evaluation, bilingualism, English, quality, PEAbstract
The aim of this paper was to know the influence of the qualification level in the second foreign language in order to see the differences in teacher perception in Bilingual Physical Education classes (AICLE). For this, 146 active teachers in Physical Education participated in the present study, to whom the Physical Education Session Evaluation questionnaire (CESEFA) was administered through. Effects based on the sex of the participants and age category were also checked. The analysis of results showed that the participants who had a C1 level of English had a more positive perception of all categories analyzed. In turn, no differences were found based on the sex of the participants, but were found based on the age category, finding that those under 36 with a B2 level had a better perception of their classes in the items: take advantage of breaks, adaptation of content and feedback. It is concluded that the degree of qualification influences the perception of Physical Education classes, and that in the case of the youngest subjects, there are elements related to the individual efficacy variable, where no differences were found according to the degree of qualification or even these are positive in favor of level B2.
Downloads
References
Barrios, E. & Milla-Lara, M. D. (2020). CLIL methodology, materials and resources, and assessment in a monolingual context: an analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions in Andalusia, The Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 60-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1544269
Chiva-Bartoll, O., Isidori, E., & Fazio, A. (2015). Bilingual physical education and critical pedagogy: an application based on Judo. Retos, 28, 110-115. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i28.34812
Codó, E. (2020). The dilemmas of experimental CLIL in Catalonia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural, Development, 43(4), 341-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1725525
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Lawrence Eribaum Associates Publishers.
Coral, J. & Lleixà, T. (2013). Physical Education-in-CLIL tasks. Determining tasks characteristics through the analysis of the diaries. Retos, 24, 79-84. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i24.34532
Coyle D., Hood P., & Marsh D. (2010). Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press
Custodio, M. & García, J. M. (2019). Measuring teachers’ competence to plan CLIL and diagnosis teachers’ training needs. Bordón, 72(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2019.72250
Deller, S., & Price, C. (2007). Teaching other subjects through english (CLIL). Oxford university press.
Doiz, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2017). Management teams and teaching staff: do they share the same beliefs about obligatory CLIL programmes and the use of the L1? Language and Education, 31(2), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2017.1290102
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Pavón, V. (2019). The integration of language and content in English-medium instruction courses: lecturers’ beliefs and practices. Iberica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para fines Específicos (AELFE), 38, 151-176.
Durán-Martínez, R., Beltrán-Llavador, F., & Martínez-Abad, F. (2016). A contrastive análisis between novice and expert teachers’ perceptions of school bilingual programmes. Cultura y Educación,28(4), 738-770. https//doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2016.1237339.
EF EPI (2020). EF Epi, índice EF de nivel de inglés [EF English proficiency index]. https://www.ef.com.es/assetscdn/WIBIwq6RdJvcD9bc8RMd/legacy/__/~/media/centralefcom/epi/downloads/full-reports/v10/ef-epi-2020-spanish-euro.pdf
Escobar, C. (2013). Learning to become a CLIL teacher: teaching, reflection and professional development. International Journal of Bilingual education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 334-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777389
European Commission Eurydice (2017). Cifras clave de la enseñanza de lenguas en los centros escolares de Europa, edición 2017 [Key data on language teaching in schools in Europe, 2017 edition]. Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea. https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/cifras-clave-de-la-ensenanza-de-lenguas-en-los-centros-escolares-de-europa-edicion-2017-informe-eurydice/ensenanza-lenguas-europa/22137
García-Calvo Rojo, S., & Nieto Moreno de Diezmas, E. L. (2022). Bilingual Physical Education-CLIL through teaching games for understanding: comparative analysis of intrinsic satisfaction by age and gender. Retos, 46, 458–466. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v46.91685
Gil-López, V., González Villora, S., & Hortigüela-Alcalá, D. (2021). Learning foreign languages through content and language integrated learning in physical education: A systematic review. Porta Linguarum, 35, 165-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.30827/portalin.v0i35.15785
González, H., Salazar, P. A., & Villota, J. A. (2021). Learning English as a foreign language through sports practices. Revista Boletín Redipe, 10 (4), 347-375. https://doi.org/10.36260/rbr.v10i4.1276
González-Caballero, F., Cascales, A., & Gomariz, M.A. (2022). Las estrategias neurodidácticas en el área de lengua ingles en Educación Infantil y Primaria. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado. 15(31), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v15i31.7217
Jover, G., Fleta, T., & González, R. (2016). Pre-service education of primary school teachers in the context of foreign language bilingual teaching. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 68(2), 120-135. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2016.68208
Lozano-Martínez, L. (2017). Teachers in bilingual programs in Cantabria. Elia, Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada, 17, 93-123. https://doi.org/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.05
Martínez-Hita, F. J. (2022). Specific training in CLIL in Physical Education to improve motor engagement time. Sportis. Scientific Journal of School Sport, Physical Education and Psychomotricity, 8(2), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.17979/sportis.2022.8.2.8712
Martínez-Hita, F. J., & García-Cantó, E. (2017). Influence of bilingualism on engagement motor time in Physical Education. Retos, 32, 178–182. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i32.51805
Martínez-Hita, F. J., García-Cantó, E., Gómez-López, M. & Granero-Gallegos, A. (2023). Influence of clil bilingual physical education on the engagement motor time. E-balonmano.com: Journal Sports Science, 19(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.17398/1885-7019.19.5
Martínez-Hita, F. J., Granero-Gallegos, A., & Gómez-López, M. (2022). Design and validation of a tool to evaluate CLIL in Physical Education sessions. Porta Linguarum, 37, 193-210. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi37.17795
Montero, I. & León, O. (2002). Classification and description of research methodologies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 2, 503-508.
Mosquera, I. (2017). Enseñanza bilingüe y formación del profesorado: dos caras de la misma moneda [Bilingual education and teacher training: two sides of the same coin]. Unir Revista Online. https://www.unir.net/educacion/revista/ensenanza-bilingue-y-formacion-del-profesorado-dos-caras-de-la-misma-moneda/
Nieto, E. (2019). Students, teachers and management teams in bilingual programmes. Journal of English Studies, 17, 277-297. https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.3564
Pavón, V. (2018). Learning Outcomes in CLIL Programmes: a Comparison of results between urban and rural environments. Porta Linguarum, 29, 9–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.54020
Pavón, V. & Méndez, M. C. (2017). Analysing teachers’ roles regarding cross-curricular coordination in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Journal of English Studies, 15, 235-260. http://doi.org/10.18172/jes.3227
Pena, C. & Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2020). Effects of focus on form on primary CLIL students’ foreign language performance in task-based oral interaction. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 8, 53-79. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.17028.alf
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2015). Evaluating CLIL programmes: instrument design and validation. Revista de Educación Pulso, 39, 79-112. http://hdl.handle.net/10017/28338
Pérez, A., Lorenzo, F. & Pavón, V. (2016). European bilingual models beyond lingua franca: key findings from CLIL French programs. Language Policy, 15, 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-015-9386-7
Salvador-García, C., Chiva-Bartoll, O., & Vergáz Gallego, J. J. (2018). Students’ perception of the use of CLIL method in Physical Education: A Case Study. Retos, 33, 138-142. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i33.53665
Sánchez-Vegas, V., Coterón, J., González-Peño, A., & Franco, E. (2022). Physical Education in Bilingual Schools: Effect of the language use on students’perceptions of teaching communication and motivation. Retos, 43, 352-360. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v43i0.89269
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage: Thousand Oaks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
****
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: The results of this publication have been obtained from the treatment of the data of the Doctoral Thesis of Francisco José Martínez Hita entitled "Evaluation of bilingual teaching in CLIL Physical Education classes and its impact on motor engagement time": https://digitum.um.es/digitum/bitstream/10201/122883/1/Franciscojose.martinez.hita_sin.articulos.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain copyright and guarantee to the journal the right to be the first to publish the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately enter into additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
