El impacto de las tareas de autodesarrollo orientadas a la competitividad en la motivación de los estudiantes españoles en la enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi43.30327Palabras clave:
enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras; competitividad; estrategias de motivación; gamificación significativa; tecnologías de la información y la comunicaciónResumen
El cambio drástico de las clases tradicionales predominantemente presenciales a la enseñanza virtual o híbrida, introducido tras la pandemia del COVID-19, nos insta a cuestionar nuestra práctica docente y los materiales para mantener o mejorar los incentivos de los estudiantes, ya que su motivación es una fuerza poderosa para el aprendizaje incremental. Por otra parte, las tendencias educativas recientes parecen fomentar la evitación de la competencia por edad. Sin embargo, desde un punto de vista teórico, los materiales de aprendizaje competitivo orientados a la superación personal y significativamente gamificados tienen la posibilidad de ser materiales significativamente útiles para activar la motivación instintiva de los estudiantes. Partiendo de este supuesto, este estudio pretende explorar el potencial de los ejercicios en línea con Moodle, que incorporan las teorías de la gamificación significativa y la competitividad orientada a la superación personal, para motivar a los estudiantes, favorecer un mejor rendimiento y servir como fuente de disfrute en el aprendizaje. A partir de los datos recogidos en una universidad española, se realizaron análisis cuantitativos y cualitativos. Nuestros resultados revelan que los ejercicios en línea ayudaron a los estudiantes a obtener resultados satisfactorios.
Descargas
Citas
Abdolrezapour, P., Jahanbakhsh Ganjeh, S., & Ghanbari, N. (2023). Self-efficacy and resilience as predictors of students’ academic motivation in online education. PLoS ONE, 18(5), 1-12. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.02859 84
Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2017). Sixty years of language motivation research: Looking back and looking forward. SAGE Open, 7(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017701976
Atkinson, J. W. & Reitman, W. R. (1956). Performance as a function of motive strength and expectancy of goal-attainment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 53(3), 361-366. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043477
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Van Nostrand.
Baumann, C., & Harvey, M. (2018). Competitiveness vis-à-vis motivation and personality as drivers of academic performance: Introducing the MCP model. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(1), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2017-0263
Bennett, S., Maton, K. & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debates: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
Bipp, T. & Van Dam, K. (2014). Extending hierarchical achievement motivation models: The role of motivational needs for achievement goals and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 156-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.039
Borja Manero, J. T., Fernández-Vara, C., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2017). Investigating the impact of gaming habits, gender, and age on the effectiveness of an educational video game: An exploratory study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(2), 236-246. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2572702
Brown S. P., Cron, W. L. & Slocum Jr., J. W. (1998). Effect of trait competitiveness and perceived intraorganizational competition on salesperson goal setting and perfor-mance. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 88-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252289
Cagiltay, N. E., Ozcelik, E., & Ozcelik, N. S. (2015). The effect of competition on learning in games. Computers & Education, 87, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.001
Çakmak, M. (2017). Student teachers’ views regarding the impact of effective teaching strategies on student motivation. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators 2, 6(2), 191-204. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jtee/issue/43273/525701
Cao, Y., Gong, S. Y., Wang, Z., Cheng, Y., & Wang, Y. Q. (2022). More challenging or more achievable? The impacts of difficulty and dominant goal orientation in leader-boards within educational gamification. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 38, 845-860. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jcal. 12652.
Covington, M. C. (1998). The will to learn: A guide for motivating young people. Cam-bridge University Press.
Covington, M. C. (2000). Goal theory, motivation and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.171
Cruz, C., Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2017). The need to achieve: Players’ perceptions and uses of extrinsic meta-game reward systems for video game consoles. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 516-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.017
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification”. 15th International Academic MindTrek Con-ference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9-15). https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge Univer-sity Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667343
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613349
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educa-tional Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
Fülöp, M. & Orosz, G. (2015). State of the art in competition research. In R. A. Scott and S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1-16). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0317
Fülöp, M. (2009). Happy and unhappy competitors: What makes the difference? Psycho-logical Topics, 18, 345-367. https://hrcak.srce.hr/48218
Graham, C. R. (2004). Blended learning system: definition, current trends, and future direc-tions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer Publishing.
Hölling, C. E., Tumasjan, A., & Welpe, I. M. (2020). Individualizing gamified systems: The role of trait competitiveness and leaderboard design. Journal of Business Research 106, 288-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.046
Houston, J. M., Harris, P. B., Moore, R., Brummett, R., & Kamatani, H. (2005). Competi-tiveness among Japanese, Chinese, and American undergraduate students. Psycho-logical Reports, 97(1), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.97.1.205-212
Kirkpatrick, R., Kirkpatrick, J., & Derakhshan, A. (2024). An investigation into the motiva-tion and attitudes of Japanese students toward learning English: A case of elemen-tary and junior high school students. Asian Journal of Second and Foreign Lan-guage Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00243-z
Larson, P. (2006). The return of the text: A welcome challenge for less commonly taught languages. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 255-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00395_5.x
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Adaptive motivation and emo-tion in education: Research and principles for instructional design. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 228-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732216644450
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A. & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? Uni-versity students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56, 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
Marvel, M. D. (2017). Player characteristics and games: findings and implications for dis-tance learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(2), 215-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239517723138
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Van Nostrand.
Mendoza, N. B., Yan, Z., & King, R. B. (2023). Supporting students’ intrinsic motivation for online learning tasks: The effectof need-supportive task instructions on motivation, self-assessment, and task performance. Computers & Education, 193, 104663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104663
Moke, K. K. F., Chang, C. K. W., Prihadi, K., & Goh, C. L. (2018). Mediation effect of resili-ence on the relationship between self-efficacy and competitiveness among universi-ty students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 7(4), 279-284. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7.i4.pp279-284
Murayama, K. & Elliot, A. J. (2012). The competition-performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and per-formance. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1035-1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028324
Murray, A. (2019). Competition as a teaching strategy. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 11(1) 13-16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1230312.pdf
Nebel, S., Schneider, S., & Rey, G. D. (2016). From duels to classroom competition: Social competition and learning in educational videogames within different group sizes. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 384-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.035
Nicholson, S. (2013). Exploring gamification techniques for classroom management. Games+Learning+Society 9.0. http://scottnicholson.com/pubs/gamificationtechniquesclassroom.pdf
Okuda, K. & Okuda, H. (2017). Nihongo kyōiku no genjō (The actual state of Japanese Education). ALC Press.
Omar, S., Azim, N. A. F., Nawi, N. S. M., & Zaini, N. (2020). Motivation strategies among English language teachers: An examination in higher education institutions in the Malaysian context. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 170-183. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.10
Orosz, G., Tóth-Király, I., Büki, N., Ivaskevics, K., Bőthe, B. & Fülöp, M. (2018). The four faces of competition: The development of the multidimensional competitive orien-tation inventory. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(779), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00779
Palmer, D. (2005). Motivational view of constructivist-informed teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1853-1881. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339654
Papi, M., & Hiver, P. (2020). Language learning motivation as a complex dynamic system: A global perspective of truth,vcontrol, and value. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12624
Petrovic-Dzerdz, M. (2019). Gamifying online tests to promote retrieval-based learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.3812
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
Pishghadam, R., Derakhshan, A., Jajarmi, H., Tabatabaee Farani, S., & Shayesteh, S. (2021). Examining the role of teachers’ stroking behaviors in EFL learners’ ac-tive/passive motivation and teacher success. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 707314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.707314
Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differ-ently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native – myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364-379. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910973776
Shinozaki, S. & Nozaki, M. (2020). CEFR ni motozuita nihongo kōsu no genjō to kadai: supein no kōritsu gogaku gakkō (EOI) ni okeru kōsu dezain (Actual state and prob-lems of Japanese course based on CEFR: course design at Spanish official lan-guage schools). The Japan Foundation Japanese-Language Education Bulletin, 16, 137-148. https://doi.org/10.20649/00000691
Smither, R. D., & Houston, J. M. (1992). The nature of competitiveness: The development and validation of the competitiveness index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(2), 407-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052002016
Tan, M., & Hew, K. F. (2016). Incorporating meaningful gamification in a blended learning research methods class: Examining student learning, engagement, and affective outcomes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2232
Tan, Y. L. L. (2018). Meaningful gamification and students’ motivation: A strategy for scaffolding reading material. Online Learning, 22(2), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i2.1167
Thornton, B., Rychman, R. M. & Gold, J. A. (2011). Competitive orientations and the type A behavior pattern. Psychology, 2(5), 411-415. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2011.25064
Tsai, F. (2017). An investigation of gender differences in a game-based learning environ-ment with different game modes. EUR-ASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3209-3226. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00713a
Tucker, O. (2020). Mastery goals and intrinsic motivation in instrumental ensembles. Music Educators Journal, 106(4), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432120901767
U. S. Department of State. (2021). FSI’s experience with language learning. https://www.state.gov/m/fsi/sls/c78549.htm.
Ucar, H., & Kumtepe, A. T. (2020). Effects of the ARCS-V-based motivational strategies on online learners’ academic performance, motivation, volition, and course interest. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12404
Vantieghem, W. & Van Houtte, M. (2018). Differences in study motivation within and between genders: An Examination by gender typicality among early adolescents. Youth & Society, 50(3), 377-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X15602268
Watson, I. R. (2013). Digital natives or digital tribes? Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 104-112. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2013.010210
Winer, B. (1985). Human motivation. Springer-Verlag.
Yamani, H. A. (2021). A conceptual framework for integrating gamification in elearning systems based on instructional design model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(4), 14–33. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3991/ ijet. v16i04. 15693
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Kyoko Ito-Morales, Jerónimo Morales-Cabezas

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.