Determining Efficient Post-writing Activity for Error Correction: Self-editing, Peer review, or Teacher Feedback?

Cuneyt Demir

doi:10.30827/portalin.vi36.15824

Autores/as

Cuneyt Demir Siirt University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi36.15824

Palabras clave:

Peer-review, error correction, self-editing, teacher correction

Resumen

Escribir en inglés siempre ha sido un obstáculo formidable para los estudiantes; en consecuencia, muchos estudios tenían como objetivo encontrar no una curita, sino soluciones completas para que los alumnos mejoraran su competencia en la escritura. Una de estas soluciones, pensada en gran medida para reducir los errores de idioma, es la corrección de errores. Sin embargo, los instructores parecen estar alternando entre diferentes retroalimentaciones correctivas con el propósito de determinar cuál es la más eficiente para sus estudiantes. Las investigaciones anteriores compararon en gran medida la retroalimentación de los compañeros y la corrección del maestro e ignoraron la autoedición. En este sentido, este estudio investigó tres métodos de corrección de errores, a saber, la autoedición, la revisión por pares y las correcciones del maestro. Para lograr esto, se crearon tres grupos de estudiantes y cada grupo, compuesto por 10 estudiantes, fue probado con un método. Para los análisis se utilizaron las pruebas U de Wilcoxon, Kruskal-Wallis y Mann-Whitney, y los resultados arrojaron diferencias significativas en términos de todos los métodos con respecto a las comparaciones de las pruebas previas y posteriores. Por otro lado, la prueba para determinar diferencias entre grupos encontró resultados significativos para el método de corrección

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Abadikhah, S., & Yasami, F. (2014). Comparison of the Effects of Peer- versus Self-editing on Linguistic Accuracy of Iranian EFL Students. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 20(3), 113-124.

Alamin, A., & Ahmed, S. (2012). Syntactical and Punctuation Errors: An Analysis of Technical Writing of University Students Science College, Taif University, KSA. English Language Teaching, 5(5), 2-8.

Allaei, S., & Connor, U. (1990). Using performative assessment instruments with ESL student writers. L. Hamp-Lyons, Assessing Second Language Writing in Academic Contexts (pp. 227-240). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Al-Wasy, B. Q., & Mahdi, H. S. (2016). The Effect of Mobile Phone Applications on Improving EFL Learners' Self-editing. Journal of Education and Human Development, 5(3), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v5n3a16.

Andrews, R., Torgerson, C., Beverton, S., Freeman, A., Locke, T., Low, G., et al. (2006). The effect of grammar teaching on writing development. British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 39-55.

Aydin, B. (2017). Three birds with a stone: Technology integration in language education with reverse mentoring model. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 6(2), 177-190.

Balderas, R. I., & Cuamatzi, G. P. M. (2018). Self and peer correction to improve college students’ writing skills. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 20(2), 179-194.

Carson, J., & Nelson, G. (1996). Chinese students’ perception of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 1-19.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2012). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.

Crossley, S., Kyle, K., Varner, L., & McNamara, D. (2014). The importance of grammar and mechanics in writing assessment and instruction: Evidence from data mining. The 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 300-303). London: Institute of Education.

Diab, N. M. (2010). Effects of peer- versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts. System, 38, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.008.

Diab, N. M. (2011). Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing. Assessing Writing, 16, 274-292. https://doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.001.

Eksi, G. Y. (2012). Peer Review versus Teacher Feedback in Process Writing: How Effective? International Language Teacher Education Research Group), 13(1), 33-48.

Elcin, D. (2017). Teachers’ and Students’ Perception s of English Teachers as Mediators. In S. Sahinkarakas, & J. Inozu, The Role of the Self in Language Learning (pp. 135-154). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24,223-236.

Elola, I. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3); 51-71.

Franco, C. P. (2008). Using wiki-based peer-correction to develop writing skills of Brazilian EFL Learners. Novitas Royal, 2(1): 49-59.

Ganji, M. (2009). Teacher-correction, Peer-correction and Selfcorrection: Their Impacts on Iranian Students’ IELTS Essay Writing Performance. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(1), 117-139.

Gurbanova, S. (2020). Error Correction in Writing. Актуальні питання гуманітарних наук, 2(30), 143-150.

Hamp-Lyons, L. (1991). Assessing Second Language Writing in Academic Contexts. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Hendrix, W. (2013). From Good to Great: The Four Stages of Effective Self-Editing. The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, 14(2), 267-283.

Hojeij, Z., & Hurley, Z. (2017). The Triple Flip: Using Technology for Peer and Self-Editing of Writing. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2017.110104.

Jodlowski, S. (2000). The effects of a teacher editor, peer editing, and serving as a peer editor on elementary students' self-editing behavior (Dissertation). ProQuest Information & Learning.

Kasule, D., & Lunga, V. (2010). How Effective are Students’ Self-Editing Endeavours? – Evidence from L2 Writing Tasks. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 1(2), 61-70.

Khaki, M., & Biria, R. (2016). Effects of Self- and Peer-Editing on Iranian TEFL Postgraduate Students’ L2 Writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(1), 155-166.

Lee, I. (2014). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. Tesol Quarterly, 48(1), 201-213.

Leggette, H. R., Rutherford, T. A., & Dunsford, D. W. (2015). A Model to Augment Critical Thinking and Create Knowledge through Writing in the Agricultural Social Sciences. NACTA journal, 59(3), 254-252.

Li, M., & Zhous, Z. (2005). SETRED: Self-Training with Editing. Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 611-621). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Li, Z., & Hegelheimer, V. (2013). Mobile-assisted grammar exercises: Effects on self-editing in L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 135-156.

Liaw, M. L. (2007). Content-Based reading and writing for critical thinking skills in an EFL context. English Teaching & Learning, 31(2), 45-87.

Liebman, J. (1992). Toward a new contrastive rhetoric: differences between Arabic and Japanese rhetorical instruction. journal of Second Language Writing, 1(2), 141-165.

Lin, G. H., & Chien, P. S. (2009). An Investigation into Effectiveness of Peer Feedback. Journal of Applied Foreign Languages Fortune Institute of Technology, 3, 79-87.

Rachmawati, D., Juniardi, Y., & Fawziah, Z. (2018). An analysis of the implementation of peer correction technique on students’ exposition text. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 1(3), 167-186.

Sangeetha, V. (2020). Inculcating Self-editing Skills for Enhancing Writing Skills of the EFL Students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 509-522. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13133a.

Sultana, A. (2009). Peer correction in ESL classrooms. BRAC University Journal, 6(1);11-19.

Sunahase, T., Baba, Y., & Kashima, H. (2019). Probabilistic Modeling of Peer Correction and Peer Assessment. Proceedings of The 12th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, (pp. 426-431).

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327–369.

Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255-272.

Tsuroyya, C. (2020). Students’ Perception On Peer Correction For Academic Writing Performance. The Journal of English Literacy Education: The Teaching and Learning of English as a Foreign Language, 7(1), 11-19.

Vinter, A., & Chartrel, E. (2010). Effects of different types of learning on handwriting movements in young children. Learning and Instruction, 20(6): 476-486.

Warsono, E. (2017). Employing Self and Peer Editing Techniques to Teach Writing Recount Texts for Students with High and Low Motivation. English Education Journal, 3,220-226.

Winarto, A. (2018). Peer and self editing strategies to improve students' sriting skills. JEELS, 5(1); 49-71. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v5i1.552.

Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing writing, 15(1), 3-17.