Auditing the numeracy demands of the middle years curriculum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v6i4.6138Palabras clave:
Alfabetización matemática, Desarrollo del currículo, Pensamiento críticoResumen
The National Numeracy Review Report recognized that numeracy development requires an across the curriculum commitment. To explore the nature of this commitment we conducted a numeracy audit of the South Australian Middle Years curriculum, using a numeracy model that incorporates mathematical knowledge, dispositions, tools, contexts, and a critical orientation. All learning areas in the published curriculum were found to have distinctive numeracy demands. The audit should encourage teachers to promote numeracy in even richer ways in the curriculum they enact with students.
Inspección de las demandas de la alfabetización matemática en el currículo de la educación secundaria obligatoria
Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/20051
Nº de citas en WOS (2017): 3 (Citas de 2º orden, 5)
Nº de citas en SCOPUS (2017): 3 (Citas de 2º orden, 13)
Descargas
Citas
Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (1997). Numeracy = everyone's business. Report of the Numeracy Education Strategy Development Conference. Adelaide, Australia: AAMT.
Cockcroft, W. (1982). Mathematics counts. London, England: HMSO.
Department of Education and Children's Services (2005). South Australian curriculum, standards and accountability framework. Retrieved February 23, 2012, from http://www.sacsa.sa.edu.au
Frankenstein, M. (2001, January). Reading the world with math: Goals for a critical mathematical literacy curriculum. Keynote address delivered at the 18th Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, Canberra, Australia.
Goos, M. (2007, August). Developing numeracy in the learning areas (middle years). Keynote address delivered at the South Australian Literacy and Numeracy Expo, Adelaide, Australia.
Human Capital Working Group, Council of Australian Governments (2008). National numeracy review report. Retrieved February 23, 2012, from http://www.coag.gov.au/reports/index.cfm#numeracy
Malloy, C. (2002). Democratic assess to mathematics through democratic education: an introduction. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 17-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McLeod, D. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: a reconceptualization. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575-596). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Ministry of Education (1959). 15 to 18: A report of the Central Advisory Council for Education. London, England: HMSO.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Curriculum Board (2009). Shape of the Australian curriculum: mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Australian_Curriculum_-_Maths.pdf
Noss, R., Hoyles, C., & Pozzi, S. (2000). Working knowledge: mathematics in use. In A. Bessot & J. Ridgeway (Eds.), Education for mathematics in the workplace (pp. 17-35). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris, France: Author.
Sfard, A., & McClain, K. (2002). Analyzing tools: perspectives on the role of designed artifacts in mathematics learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2&3), 153-161.
Steen, L. (2001). The case for quantitative literacy. In L. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: the case for quantitative literacy (pp. 1-22). Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Zevenbergen, R. (2004). Technologizing numeracy: intergenerational differences in working mathematically in new times. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 97-117.