Discourses of power in mathematics education research: Concepts and possibilities for action
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v2i2.6202Keywords:
Discourses of power in mathematics education research, Liberal view of power, Marxist view of power, Post-structuralist view of powerAbstract
Mathematics education is powerful. This is an assertion that appears often in mathematics education research papers. However, the meaning of the assertion is far from being clear. An analysis of different ways of talking about power in relation to mathematics education, in research literature, is put forward. Three main discourses are identified: Power as an intrinsic capacity, power as structural imbalance, and power as distributed positioning. Identifying these discourses allows clarifying the values associated to mathematics education and the pedagogical imaginaries that are possible to envision for mathematics teaching and learning.
Discursos sobre el poder en la investigación en Educación Matemática: conceptos y posibilidades para la acción
Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/4440
Nº de citas en WOS (2017): 4 (Citas de 2º orden, 27)
Nº de citas en SCOPUS (2017): 5 (Citas de 2º orden, 29)
Downloads
References
Boaler, J. (1997). Experiencing school mathematics. Teaching styles, sex, and setting. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Brown, T. (2001). Mathematics education and language: Interpreting hermeneutics and post-structuralism (Rev. 2nd ed.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0726-9
Brown, T., & McNamara, O. (2005). New teacher identity and regulative government: The discursive formation of primary mathematics teacher education. New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b104107
Burton, L. (2003). Which way social justice in mathematics education? Westport: Praeger.
Christensen, O. R., Stentoft, D., & Valero, P. (2007). Power distribution in the network of mathematics education practices. In K. Nolan & E. De Freitas (Eds.), Opening the research text: Critical insights and in(ter)ventions into mathematics education (pp. 131-146). New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75464-2_6
Cotton, T. (2004). What can I say and what can I do? Archaeology, narrative, assessment. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 219-238). Greenwich: Information Age.
D'Ambrosio, U. (1993). Etnomatemática. Arte ou técnica de explicar e conhecer. Sao Paulo: Ática.
English, L. D. (2002a). Preface. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. xi). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
English, L. D. (Ed.). (2002b). Handbook of international research in mathematics education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ernest, P. (2004). Postmodernity and social research in mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 65-84). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. Harlow: Longman - Pearson Education.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (1st American ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M., & Faubion, J. D. (2000). Power. New York: New Press.
Frankenstein, M. (1995). Equity in mathematics education: Class in the world outside the class. In E. Fennema & L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 165-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Gee, J. P., & Green, J. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1167289
Hardy, T. (2004). "There's no hiding place". Foucault's notion of normalization at work in a mathematics lesson. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 103-119). Greenwich: Information Age.
Held, D. (1980). Introduction to critical theory. Horkheimer to Habermas. Cambridge: Polity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520341272
Keitel, C. (1989). Mathematics, education, and society (science and technology education, document series No. 35). Paris: Unesco.
Keitel, C. (Ed.). (1998). Social justice and mathematics education. Gender, class, ethnicity, and the politics of schooling. Berlin: IOWME - Freie Universität Berlin.
Kieran, C., Forman, E. A., & Sfard, A. (2001). Guest editorial. Learning discourses: Sociocultural approaches to research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014276102421
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609268
Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19-44). Westport: Ablex Publishing.
Lerman, S. (2006). Cultural psychology, anthropology and sociology: The developing 'strong' social turn. In J. Maasz & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 171-188). Rotterdam: Sense. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903510_016
Meaney, T. (2004). So what's power got to do with it? In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 181-200). Greenwich: Information Age.
Mellin-Olsen, S. (1987). The politics of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Niss, M. (1996). Goals of mathematics teaching. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 11-47). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Nolan, K., & De Freitas, E. (Eds.). (2007). Opening the research text: Critical insights and in(ter)ventions into mathematics education. New York: Springer.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2002). Whose heaven and whose redemption? The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum to save (please check one or all of the following: (a) the economy, (b) democracy, (c) the nation, (d) human rights, (d) the welfare state, (e) the individual). In P. Valero & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Mathematics Education and Society (pp. 29-45). Copenhagen: Center for Research in Learning Mathematics.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2004). School subjects, the politics of knowledge, and the projects of intellectuals in change. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 251-267). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7914-1_20
Popkewitz, T. S., & Brennan, M. (1998). Foucault's challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Powell, A. (2002). Ethnomathematics and the challenges of racism in mathematics education. In P. Valero & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Mathematics Education and Society (pp. 15-28). Copenhagen: Center for Research in Learning Mathematics.
Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meet the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3), 13-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48085-9_1
Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3556-8
Skovsmose, O. (2005). Traveling through education: Uncertainty, mathematics, responsibility. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903626
Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2001). Breaking political neutrality: The critical engagement of mathematics education with democracy. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education. An international perspective (pp. 37-55). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2002). Democratic access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education. Directions for the 21st Century (pp. 383-407). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Valero, P. (1999). Deliberative mathematics education for social democratization in Latin America. Zentrlblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 99(1), 20-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-999-0004-z
Valero, P. (2004). Socio-political perspectives on mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 5-24). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Valero, P. (2007). A socio-political look at equity in the school organization of mathematics education. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 39(3), 225-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0027-2
Valero, P., & Zevenbergen, R. (2004). Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b120597
Wagner, D. (2004). Silence and voice in the secondary mathematics classroom. Edmonton: University of Alberta.
Walshaw, M. (2004). Mathematics education within the postmodern. Greenwich: Information Age.
Weber, M. (1947). Social stratification and class structure. In T. Parsons (Ed.), The theory of social and economic organization (pp. 424-429). New York: Free Press.
Wedege, T. (2006). Hvorfor stave problematik med q? - Om centrale problemstillinger i matematikdidaktisk forskning. In M. Blomhøj & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Kunne det tænkes? - om matematiklæring (pp. 312-332). Albertslund (Denmark): Malling Beck.
Zevenbergen, R., & Ortiz-Franco, L. (Eds.). (2002). Equity and mathematics education [Special issue]. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217359