Diagrammatic thinking: Notes on Peirce’s semiotics and epistemology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v3i1.6192Palabras clave:
Cultura, Kant, Peirce, Percepción, Pensamiento diagramático, SemióticaResumen
In this paper, I discuss the role of diagrammatic thinking within the larger context of cognitive activity as framed by Peirce’s semiotic theory of and its underpinning realistic ontology. After a short overview of Kant’s scepticism in its historical context, I examine Peirce’s attempt to rescue perception as a way to reconceptualize the Kantian “manifold of senses”. I argue that Peirce’s redemption of perception led him to a series of problems that are as fundamental as those that Kant encountered. I contend that the understanding of the difficulties of Peirce’s epistemology allows us to better grasp the limits and possibilities of diagrammatic thinking.
Pensamiento diagramático: notas sobre la semiótica y la epistemología de Peirce
Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/4217
Nº de citas en WOS (2017): 4 (Citas de 2º orden, 10)
Nº de citas en SCOPUS (2017): 2 (Citas de 2º orden, 10)
Descargas
Biografía del autor/a
Luis Radford, Université Laurentienne, Canadá
.gif)
Código ORCID 
ResearcherID
Citas
Adorno, T. W. (2001). Kant's critique of pure reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Allison, H. (1973). The Kant-Eberhard controversy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Colapietro, V., Midtgarden, T., & Strand, T. (2005). Introduction: Peirce and education: The conflicting processes of learning and discovery. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 24(3-4), 167-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-005-3842-3
De Tienne, A. (1993). [Hypotheses of space and time: A response to Kant] Charles S. Peirce, Appendix No. 2. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 29(4), 637-673.
Eco, U. (1999). Kant and the Platypus. Essays on language and cognition. San Diego: Harcourt, Inc.
Eisle, C. (1979). Studies in the scientific and mathematical philosophy of Charles S. Peirce (Edited by R. M. Martin). The Hague: Mouton.
Floridi, L. (1994). Scepticism and the search for knowledge: a Peirceish answer to a Kantian doubt. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 30(3), 543-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3853525
Hjelmslev, L. (1969). Prolegomena to a theory of language. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2002). Peirce's “Diagrammatic Reasoning” as a solution of the learning paradox. In G. Debrock (Ed.), The quiet revolution: Essays on process pragmatism (pp. 147-174). Amsterdam: Rodopi Press.
Hoopes, J. (Ed.). (1991). Peirce on signs. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press.
Kant, I. (1929). Critique of pure reason. (Norman K. Smith, Trans.). New York: St. Marin's Press. (Original work published 1781 and 1787)
Kant, I. (1959). Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to present itself as a science. (Peter G. Lucas, Trans.). Manchester: Manchester University Press. (Original work published 1783)
Lektorsky, V. A. (1984). Subject, object, cognition. Moscow: Progress Publisher.
Nesher, D. (1997). Peircean realism: Truth as the meaning of cognitive signs representing external reality. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 33(1), 201-257.
Netz, R. (1999). The shaping of deduction in Greek mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543296
Parker, K. (1994). Peirce's semiotic and ontology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 30(1), 51-75.
Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 47-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers (Vols. 1-8). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1976). The New Elements of Mathematics (NEM). (C. Eisele, Ed.). The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Radford, L. (2002a). The object of representations: Between wisdom and certainty. In F. Hitt (Ed.), Representations and mathematics visualization (219-240). Mexico: Departamento de Matemática Educativa CINVESTAV-IPN.
Radford, L. (2002b). The seen, the spoken and the written. A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 14-23.
Radford, L. (2003a). Gestures, speech and the sprouting of signs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0501_02
Radford, L. (2003b). On the epistemological limits of language. Mathematical knowledge and social practice during the Renaissance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(2), 123-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024029808871
Radford, L. (2003c). On Culture and Mind. A post-Vygotskian semiotic perspective, with an example from Greek mathematical thought. In M. Anderson, A. Sáenz-Ludlow, S. Zellweger, & V. V. Cifarelly (Eds.), Educational perspectives on mathematics as semiosis: From thinking to interpreting to knowing (pp. 49-79). Ottawa: Legas Publishing.
Radford, L. (2008). Culture and cognition: Towards an anthropology of mathematical thinking. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd Ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Rosenthal, S. (2001). Firstness and the collapse of universals. In Digital Encyclopedia of Charles S. Peirce. Retrieved on June 2003, from http://www.digitalpeirce.org/
Stjernfelt, F. (2000). Diagrams as centerpiece of a Peircean epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 36(3), 357-384.
Thellefsen, T. L (n/d). Firstness and thirdness displacement - The epistemology of Peirce's three sign trichotomies. In Digital Encyclopedia of Charles S. Peirce. Retrieved on June 2003, from http://www.digitalpeirce.org/
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
