Validación de un cuestionario sobre la percepción y satisfacción del profesorado universitario con los sistemas de evaluación profesional

Katia Caballero Rodríguez; Javier Mula-Falcón; Eduardo García-Jiménez

doi:10.30827/relieve.v31i1.28345

المؤلفون

Katia Caballero Rodríguez University of Granada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2385-8996
Javier Mula-Falcón University of Cádiz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1977-7026
Eduardo García-Jiménez University of Seville

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v31i1.28345

الكلمات المفتاحية:

الاستبيان، التحقق من الصدق، الدراسة السيكومترية، التصورات، الرضا المهني، تقييم هيئة التدريس، أعضاء هيئة التدريس الجامعيون

الوكالات: Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España, R D i project ‘La influencia del neoliberalismo en las identidades académicas y en el nivel de satisfacción profesional’ -NEOACADEMIC- (PID2019-105631GA-I00/AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033), Grants for the support and promotion of research at the University of Granada in the field of equality, Project ‘Gender inequalities in the new managerial university and their impact on female academics’ -DAMA- (INV-IGU199-2022), Ministry of Universities (Spain), University Teacher Training Grants Programme (FPU19/00942)

الملخص

تندرج عملية تحول التعليم العالي ضمن أهدافها تحسين الجودة، ولهذا الغرض، تم إدراج عمليات التقييم والاعتماد التي لا تزال، حتى اليوم، تسعى إلى ترسيخ مكانتها. يهدف هذا العمل إلى التحقق من صحة الاستبيان المعنون بـ "تصورات ورضا أعضاء هيئة التدريس الجامعيين حول تطوير وتقييم نشاطهم المهني" (PSPU). لتحقيق ذلك، تم إجراء بحث ومراجعة للأدوات المتوفرة، مما أتاح الشروع في تصميم استبيان يقيس تصورات ودرجة رضا هيئة التدريس تجاه أنظمة التقييم. بعد ذلك، تم التحقق من صلاحية محتوى الاستبيان من خلال تقييم عشرة خبراء. وقد تم تطبيق الاستبيان على مجتمع الدراسة المكوّن من الأساتذة الرسميين والمتعاقدين في الجامعات الحكومية الأندلسية، حيث تم الحصول على عينة مكونة من 2183 مشاركًا (بنسبة 12.4%). وأتاح تحليل صلاحية البنية من خلال تحليل عاملي تأكيدي متعدد المجموعات تحديد ثلاثة عوامل، كما أدى تحليل الموثوقية إلى بناء نموذج نظري مكوّن من ثلاث أبعاد، تم الحصول فيها على معامل ألفا كرونباخ يفوق 0.80. تؤكد النتائج صلاحية ومصداقية الاستبيان، الذي يقيس كلاً من رضا وتصورات أعضاء هيئة التدريس الجامعيين تجاه أنظمة تقييم أدائهم المهني. ويُستنتج أن تطبيق هذا الأداة سيساهم في توليد معلومات أساسية لتصميم سياسات جامعية وممارسات تقييم أكثر عدلاً وفعالية، مما يحسن الرفاه الأكاديمي وجودة أداء المهام، لصالح نظام التعليم العالي

التنزيلات

بيانات التنزيل غير متوفرة بعد.

السير الشخصية للمؤلفين

Katia Caballero Rodríguez، University of Granada

Associate professor in the Department of Didactics and School Organisation at the University of Granada. Her research focuses on higher education, academic identity and professional development. She has led and participated in various research projects funded by public organisations and has completed different stays at international universities. She is a member of the FYDAD research group (Training, Development and Teaching).

Javier Mula-Falcón، University of Cádiz

PhD in Educational Sciences at the University of Granada. Teacher and researcher at the University of Cadiz and member of the FYDAD research group (Training, Development and Teaching). His main lines of research focus on higher education, teacher professional development and educational policy.

Eduardo García-Jiménez، University of Seville

Full professor of Educational Evaluation at the University of Seville. Member of the research group ‘LITERACIES: Literacy, multilingualism, diversity and social justice’. His research activity focuses on three main areas: educational assessment, research methodology and competence in linguistic communication.

المراجع

Abrizah, A., Shah, N. A. K., & Nicholas, D. (2019). Malaysian early career researchers on the ethics of scholarly publishing. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 24(1), 75-96. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol24 no1.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol24no1.5

Addisu, M. (2018). Determinants of Job Satisfaction Among Employees of Gondar College of Teacher Education, Ethiopia. Research on Humanities and Social sciences, 8(21), 22-32.

Albert, C., Davia, M., & Legazpe, N. (2018): Job satisfaction amongst academics: the role of research productivity. Studies in Higher Education, 43(8). 1362-1377. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1255937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1255937

Brøgger, K. (2019). How education standards gain hegemonic power and become international: The case of higher education and the Bologna Process. European Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 158-180. http://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118790303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118790303

Brunner, J., Labraña, J., Ganga, F., & Rodríguez-Ponce, E (2019). Circulación y recepción de la teoría del “capitalismo académico” en América Latina. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 27(79), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4368

Caballero, K. (2009). Construcción y desarrollo de la identidad profesional del profesorado Universitario [Tesis Doctoral]. Universidad de Granada. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/2200

Caballero, K. (2013). Nivel de satisfacción del profesorado universitario con los sistemas de evaluación. Revista de Educación, 360, 483-508. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-360-124

Cardoso, S., Rosa, M. J., & Santos, C. S. (2013). Different academics' characteristics, different perceptions on quality assessment? Quality Assurance in Education, 21(1), 96-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881311293089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881311293089

Castelló, M., McAlpine, L., & Pyhältö, K. (2017). Spanish and UK post-PhD researchers: writing perceptions, well-being and productivity. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1108-1122. https://doi.org.10.1080/07294360.2017.1296412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1296412

Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (2002). Métodos de Investigación educativa. La Muralla.

Fernández-Cano, A. (2021). Letter to the Editor: publish, publish… cursed! Scientometrics 126, 3673-3682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03833-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03833-7

García-Garnica, M. (2016). Elaboración y validación de un cuestionario para medir prácticas eficaces de liderazgo pedagógico de la dirección. Profesorado Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 20(3), 493–526.

Hazelkorn, E. (2018). The accountability and transparency agenda: Emerging issues in the global era. En A. Curaj, L. Deca & R. Pricopie (Eds.), European higher education area: The impact of past and future policies (pp. 423–440). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77407-7_26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77407-7_26

Hernández, F., & Cuesta Saéz, J. D. (2009). Métodos Cuantitativos de Investigación. En M. P Colás, L. Buendía & F. Hernández (2009). Competencias Científicas para la realización de una tesis doctoral. Davinci.

Huisman, J. (2018). Accountability In Higher Education. En P. Nuno & J. Shin, Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions (pp.1-5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_156-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_156-1

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7, 396-403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975

Martín-Romera, A., & Molina, E. (2017). Valor del conocimiento pedagógico para la docencia en Educación Secundaria: diseño y validación de un cuestionario. Estudios Pedagógicos, 43(2), 195-220. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052017000200011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052017000200011

McCune, V. (2019). Academic identities in contemporary higher education: sustaining identities that value teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1632826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1632826

Mohan, P., & Fauzi, M. (2021). Job Satisfaction among Academics in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3), 1457-1483.

Mula-Falcon, J., & Caballero, K. (2022). Neoliberalism and its impact on academics: A qualitative review. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 27(3), 373-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2022.2076053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2022.2076053

Mula-Falcón, J., Lucena, C., Domingo Segovia, J., & Cruz-González, C. (2021). Early career researchers' identity: A qualitative review. Higher Education Quarterly, 76, 786-799. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12348

Newton, J. (2000). Feeding the beast or improving quality? Academics’ perceptions of quality assurance and quality monitoring. Quality in Higher Education, 6(2), 153–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713692740

Pattaro, A., Moura, P., & Kruijf, A. (2022). Transparency and Accountability in Higher Education as a Response to External Stakeholders and Rules: A Comparison Between Three Country-Case Studies. En E. Caperchione & C. Bianchi (Eds.), Governance and Performance Management in Public Universities (pp.15-49). Springer. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85698-4_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85698-4_2

Raaper, R. (2016). Academic perceptions of higher education assessment processes in neoliberal academia. Critical Studies in Education, 57(2), 175-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.1019901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.1019901

Reyes, O., & Hernández Moncada, M. C. (2021). Formato: Validación de contenido por juicio de expertos. Instrumentos cuantitativos [Manuscrito no publicado]. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26812.36486

Santos, A., Muñoz-Rodríguez, D., & Poveda, M. (2015). “En cuerpo y alma”: Insatisfacción y precariedad en las condiciones de trabajo del profesorado universitario. Arxius, 32, 13-14.

Shams, F. (2019). Managing academic identity tensions in a Canadian public university: the role of identity work in coping with managerialism. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(6), 619-632. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1643960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1643960

Shin, J. C., & Jung, J. (2014). Academics job satisfaction and job stress across countries in the changing academic environments. Higher Education, 67, 603-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9668-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9668-y

Singh, K. (2007). Quantitative Social Research Methods. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9789351507741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9789351507741

Stensaker, B. (2018). External Quality Assurance in Higher Education. En J. Shin & P. Teixeira (eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_523-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_523-1

Szromek, A., & Wolniak, R. (2020). Job satisfaction and problems among academic staff in higher education. Sustainability, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124865

Teichler, U., Arimoto, A., & Cummings, W. (2013). The Changing Academic Profession: Major Findings of a Comparative Survey. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6155-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6155-1

Tesouro, M., Corominas, E., Teixidó, J., & Puiggalí, J. (2014). La autoeficacia docente e investigadora del profesorado universitario: relación con su estilo docente e influencia en sus concepciones sobre el nexo docencia-investigación. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 32(1), 169-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.32.1.172771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.32.1.172771

Thoms, P., Dose, J., & Scott, K. S. (2002). Relationships Between Accountability, Job Satisfaction, and Trust. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(3), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1033

Tomicic, A. (2019). American dream, Humboldtian nightmare: Reflections on the remodelled values of a neoliberalized academia. Policy Futures in Education, 17(8), 1057-1077. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210319834825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210319834825

Ursin, J., Vähäsantanen, K., McAlpine L., & Hökkä, P. (2020). Emotionally loaded identity and agency in Finnish academic work. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(3), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1541971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1541971

Von Der Embse, N. P., Sandilos, L. E., Pendergast, L., & Mankin, A. (2016). Teacher stress, self-efficacy, and job satisfaction. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.001

Ylijoki, O., Lyytinen, A., & Marttila, L. (2011). Different research markets: a disciplinary perspective. Higher Education, 62, 721-740. https://doi.org.10.1007/s10734-011-9414-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9414-2

Zenatta, E., Ponce, T., García, L., Sánchez, C., & Gama, J. (2017). Diseño del cuestionario: Estrategias identitarias de académicos universitarios ante las reformas educativas. Revista de Psicología, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201702.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201702.011

Zhang, L., Fu, M., & Li, D. (2020). Hong Kong academics’ perceived work environment and job dissatisfaction: The mediating role of academic self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1431-1443. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000437