Prevalence and factors associated with academic plagiarism in freshmen students of Social Work and Social Education: an empirical analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v29i2.29055Keywords:
academic plagiarism, academic integrity, fraud in evaluation tests, higher educationAbstract
This article focuses on the study of academic plagiarism among freshmen university students enrolled in the degrees of Social Work and Social Education. Through a questionnaire applied to 913 students from 6 cohorts, the prevalence of plagiarism and some of the main factors associated with this phenomenon are analysed. The main results indicate that the students with the greatest tendency to plagiarize are associated with being male, younger, consider themselves to be worse students, value plagiarism less seriously, are poorly motivated by their studies and face academic tasks with a propensity to procrastinate. Finally, the students who plagiarize the most in their assignments are also the ones with the greatest propensity toward dishonest behaviour in other evaluation activities and the ones who attach the least seriousness to this fraud. The conclusions of the study indicate and provide areas for interventions aimed at promoting academic integrity and reducing fraudulent practices in higher education based on evidence.
Downloads
References
Amigud, A., & Lancaster, T. (2019). 246 reasons to cheat: An analysis of students’ reasons for seeking to outsource academic work. Computers & Education, 134, 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.017
Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). High-stakes testing & student learning. Education policy analysis archives, 10, 18-38. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v10n18.2002
Bertram Gallant, T. (2017). Academic integrity as a teaching & learning issue: From theory to practice. Theory Into Practice, 56(2), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2017.1308173
Brimble, M., y Stevenson-Clarke, P. (2006). Managing academic dishonesty in Australian universities: Implications for teaching, learning and scholarship. Accounting, Accountability & Performance, 12(1), 32-63. https://acortar.link/uhjC0N
Cerdà-Navarro, A., Touza, C., Morey-López, M., y Curiel, E. (2022). Academic integrity policies against assessment fraud in postgraduate studies: An analysis of the situation in Spanish universities. Heliyon, 8(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09170.
Cerdà-Navarro, A., Touza-Garma, C., Pozo-Llorente, T. y Comas-Forgas, R. (2023). Analysis of the prevalence, evolution, and severity of dishonest behaviors of Spanish graduate students: the vision of academic heads. Praxis Educativa, 18, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.18.21027.009.
Collins, M.E. y Amodeo, E. (2005). Responding to plagiarism in schools of social work: considerations and recommenfdations. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(3), 527-543. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2005.200303131.
Comas Forgas, R. (2009). El ciberplagio y otras formas de deshonestidad académica entre el alumnado universitario. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de las Islas Baleares.
Comas-Forgas, R., & Sureda-Negre, J. (2010). Academic plagiarism: Explanatory factors from students’ perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8(3), 217-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-010-9121-0
Comas-Forgas, R., Lancaster, T., Calvo-Sastre, A., & Sureda-Negre, J. (2021). Exam cheating and academic integrity breaches during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of internet search activity in Spain. Heliyon, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08233
Chiang, F. K., Zhu, D., & Yu, W. (2022). A systematic review of academic dishonesty in online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 907-928. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12656
De Lambert, K., Ellen, N. & Taylor, L. (2003). Cheating – What is it and why do it: a study in New Zealand Tertiary Institutions of the Perceptions and Justifications for Academic Dishonesty. Journal of American Academy of Business, 3(1/2), 98-104.
De Maio, C., & Dixon, K. (2022). Promoting academic integrity in institutions of higher learning: What 30 years of research (1990-2020) in Australasia has taught us. Journal of College and Character, 23(1), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2194587X.2021.2017972
Denisova-Schmidt, E. (2016). Academic dishonesty or corrupt values: The case of Russia. En D. Torsello (Ed.), Corruption in Public Administration: An Ethnographic Approach (pp. 105−137). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785362590.00012
Espiñeira-Bellón, E. M., Muñoz-Cantero, J. M., Gerpe-Pérez, E. M., y Castro-Pais, M. D. (2021). Ciberplagio como soporte digital en la realización de trabajos académicos. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 68(29), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.3916/C68-2021-10
Fatima, A., Sunguh, K. K., Abbas, A., Mannan, A., & Hosseini, S. (2020). Impact of pressure, self-efficacy, and self-competency on students’ plagiarism in higher education. Accountability in Research, 27(1), 32-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1699070
Fenster, J. (2016). Teaching Note. Evaluation of an avoiding Plagiarism Workshop for Social Work Students. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(2) 242-248 https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1151278.
Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. The journal of educational research, 97(3), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.3.115-121
Fontaine, S., Frenette, E., & Hébert, M. H. (2020). Exam cheating among Quebec’s preservice teachers: the influencing factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00062-6
Gallent Torres, C. y Comas Forgas, R. (2023). Prévalence et évolution des conduites frauduleuses chez les étudiants de master et doctorat espagnols. En M. Bergadaa (Ed.) Les nouvelles frontières de l’intégrité académique. EMS Editions. https://doi.org/10.56240/cmb9915
Guerrero-Dib, J. G., Portales, L., y Heredia-Escorza, Y. (2020). Impact of academic integrity on workplace ethical behaviour. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-0051-3.
Jin, S.W., Warrener, C., Alhassan, M., y Jones, K.C. (2017) An empirical assessment of writing and research proficiency in HBCU social work syudents. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 27(5) 463-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2016.1203385.
Krou, M. R., Fong, C. J., & Hoff, M. A. (2021). Achievement motivation and academic dishonesty: A meta-analytic investigation. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 427-458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09557-7
Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: a review of the literature. Studies in higher education, 39(2), 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709495
Mehrens, W. A. (2002). Consequences of assessment: What is the evidence? En G. Tindal y T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Large-scale assessment programs for all students: Validity, technical adequacy, and implementation (pp. 149–177). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Miller, A. D., Murdock, T. B., Anderman, E. M., & Poindexter, A. L. (2007). Who are all these cheaters? Characteristics of academically dishonest students. En Psychology of academic cheating (pp. 9-32). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372541-7/50003-6
Montalbán, M. (2015). Algunas reflexiones sobre la copia, plagio y fraude en la evaluación universitaria. Rued@. Revista Universidad, Ética y Derechos, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.25267/Rueda.2015.06
Morey, M., Sureda, J., Oliver, M. F., & Comas, R. (2013). Plagio y rendimiento académico entre el alumnado de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Estudios sobre Educación, 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.15581/004.24.2032
Mukasa, J., Stokes, L., & Mukona, D. M. (2023). Academic dishonesty by students of bioethics at a tertiary institution in Australia: An exploratory study. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00124-5
Newton, P. M., Lang, C., & Newton, P. (2016). Custom essay writers, freelancers, and other paid third parties. Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_38
Perry, B. (2010). Exploring academic misconduct: Some insights into student behaviour. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(2), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410365657
Santoso, A., & Cahaya, F. R. (2019). Factors influencing plagiarism by accounting lecturers. Accounting Education, 28(4), 401-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1523736
Sattler, S., Wiegel, C., y Veen, F. V. (2017). The use frequency of 10 different methods for preventing and detecting academic dishonesty and the factors influencing their use. Studies in Higher Education, 42(6), 1126-1144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1085007
Stiggins, R. (2009). Assessment for learning in upper elementary grades. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(6), 419-421. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217090900060
Sureda-Negre, J., Comas, R., & Morey, M. (2009). Las causas del plagio académico entre el alumnado universitario según el profesorado. Revista iberoamericana de educación, 50, 197-220. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie500669
Sureda-Negre, J., Cerdà-Navarro, A., Calvo-Sastre, A. y Comas-Forgas, R. (2020). Las conductas fraudulentas del alumnado universitario español en las evaluaciones: valoración de su gravedad y propuestas de sanciones a partir de un panel de expertos. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 8(1), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.358781
Sureda-Negre, J., Comas-Forgas, R., & Oliver-Trobat, M. F. (2015). Academic plagiarism among secondary and high school students: Differences in gender and procrastination. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicacíon y Educacíon, 22(44), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-11
Titus, S. L., Wells, J. A., & Rhoades, L. J. (2008). Repairing research integrity. Nature, 453(7198), 980-982. https://doi.org/10.1038/453980a
Turra Marín, Y., Villagra Bravo, C., Mellado Hernández, M., & Aravena Kenigs, O. (2022). Diseño y validación de una escala de percepción de los estudiantes sobre la cultura de evaluación como aprendizaje. RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v28i2.25195
Zhao, L., Mao, H., Compton, B. J., Peng, J., Fu, G., Fang, F., ... & Lee, K. (2022). Academic dishonesty and its relations to peer cheating and culture: A meta-analysis of the perceived peer cheating effect. Educational Research Review, 36, 100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100455

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 RELIEVE – Electronic Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors grant non-exclusive rights of exploitation of works published to RELIEVE and consent to be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Use 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the published material whenever the authorship of the work and the source of publication is mentioned, and it is used for non-commercial purposes.
The authors can reach other additional and independent contractual agreements, for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, by including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), as long as it is clearly stated that the Original source of publication is this magazine.
Authors are encouraged to disseminate their work after it has been published, through the internet (for example, in institutional archives online or on its website) which can generate interesting exchanges and increase work appointments.
The fact of sending your paper to RELIEVE implies that you accept these conditions.