A Comparative Assessment of Listening Span and Self-Efficacy in Simultaneous Interpreting Training

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/sendebar.v32.16868

Keywords:

simultaneous interpreting, interpreter training, working memory, self-efficacy, listening span

Abstract

This study compares the results obtained from a group of interpreting trainees in an adapted listening span test (cognitive dimension), with those obtained from this same group in two self-efficacy tests (personality dimension). The objective is to assess the predictive value of these tests with respect to the scores obtained by the subjects in a simultaneous interpreting test. The analysis of data leads us to the conclusion that, at least in an initial training phase in simultaneous interpreting, only the cognitive factors (measured here in terms of listening span) show a significant and positive predictive capacity of the quality in simultaneous interpreting. In this regard, personality factors (measured here in terms of self-efficacy) offer results contradictory to the expectations or no significant correlation values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Saida Anssari Naim, University of Valencia

Profesora Ayudante Doctor de Traducción e Interpretación en el Departamento de Teoría de los Lenguages y Ciencias de la Comunicación. Universidad de Valencia

References

Aitchison, J. (1989). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Blackwell.

Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (11), 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2

Baessler, J. & Schwarzer, R. (1996). Evaluación de la autoeficacia: Adaptación española de la escala de autoeficacia general [Measuring Generalized Self-beliefs: A Spanish Adaptation of the General Self-efficacy Scale by A. Bueno-Pacheco, S. Lima-Castro, E. Peña-Contreras, C. Cedillo-Quizhpe, & M. Aguilar-Sizer]. Ansiedad y Estrés, 2, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP48.3.01

Bandura, A. (1995). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge University Press.

Bolaños-Medina, A. (2014). Self-efficacy in translation. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 9 (2), 197-218. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.9.2.03bol

Bontempo, K., & Napier, J. (2011). Evaluating emotional stability as a predictor of interpreter competence and aptitude for interpreting. Interpreting, 13 (1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.13.1.06bon

Chen, G., Gully, S. M. & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4 (1), 62-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004

Chernov, G. V. (2004). Inference and Anticipation in Simultaneous Interpreting. A probability-prediction model. John Benjamins.

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1988). The extended mind. Analysis, 58 (1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7

Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104 (2), 163-191. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.163

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19 (4), 450-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6

Darò, V., & Fabbro, F. (1994). Verbal memory during simultaneous interpretation: Effects of phonological interference. Applied Linguistics, 15 (4), 365-381. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.4.365

Dimitrova, B. E., & Tiselius, E. (2014). Retrospection in interpreting and translation: explaining the process? In R. Muñoz (ed.), Minding translation. Con la traducción en mente, (pp. 177-200) MONTI Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación. Número especial 1

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95 (2), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256

Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review 102 (2), 211-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211

García, A. M. (2014). The interpreter advantage hypothesis. Preliminary data patterns and empirically motivated questions. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 9 (2), 219-238. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.9.2.04gar

Gerver, D. (1975). A psychological approach to simultaneous interpreting. Meta, 20 (2), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.7202/002885ar

Gerver, D. (1976). Empirical studies of simultaneous interpretation: A review and a model. In Translation. Application and Research, R. W. Brislin, (ed.), 165-207. Garden Press.

González-Davies, M., & Enríques-Raído, V. (2016). Introduction (special issue) to Situated learning in translator and interpreter training: bridging research and good practice. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 10 (1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2016.1154339

Hild, A. (2014). The role of self-regulatory processes in the development of interpreting expertise. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 9 (1), 128-149. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.9.1.07hil

Jiang, L., Han, C., Jiang, J., & Feng, Y. (2014). The sociological turn in the interpreter’s role. Discourse interpreting filters. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 9 (2), 274-298. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.9.2.07jia

Jiménez Ivars, A., Pinazo Calatayud, D., & Ruiz i Forés, M. (2014). Self-efficacy and language proficiency in interpreter trainees. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 8 (2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2014.908552

Köpke, B., & Nespoulous, J. L. (2006). Working memory performance in expert and novice interpreters. Interpreting, 8 (1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.8.1.02kop

Lee, S. B. (2014). An Interpreting Self-Efficacy (ISE) scale for undergraduate students majoring in consecutive interpreting: construction and preliminary validation. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 8 (2), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2014.929372

López Gómez, M. J., Bajo Molina, T., Padilla Benítez, P., & Santiago de Torres, J. (2007). Predicting proficiency in signed language interpreting. Interpreting, 9 (1), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.9.1.05lop

López-Higes, R., Del Río Martín-Aragoneses, M. T., & Mejuto, G. (2012). Assessment of grammatical comprehension in normal and pathological aging: A summary of the results obtained with ECCO and ECCO_Senior tests. International Journal of Psychological Research, 5 (1), 94-106. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.766

Macnamara, B. (2012). Interpreter cognitive aptitudes. Journal of Interpretation, 19 (1), 9-32. http://digitalcommons.unf.edu/joi/vol19/iss1/1

Moser, B. (1978). Simultaneous interpretation: A hypothetical model and its practical application. In D. Gerver, & H. W. Sinaiko (eds.), Language, Communication and Interpretation, (pp. 353-368). Plenum Press.

Moser-Mercer, B. (2010). The search for neuro-physiological correlates of expertise in interpreting. In G. Shreve, & E. Angelone (eds.), Translation and Cognition, (pp. 263-287). John Benjamins.

Muñoz Martín, R. (ed.). (2014). Minding translation. Con la traducción en mente, MONTI Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación. Número especial 1

Nordet, L., & L. Voegtlin. (1998). Les tests d’aptitude pour l’interpétation de conference. La mémoire. Mémoire pour l’obtention du Diplôme de Traducteur. Genève: Université de Genève.

Padilla, P., Bajo, M. T., Cañas, J. J., & Padilla, F. (1995). Cognitive processes of memory in simultaneous interpretation. In J. Tommola (ed.), Topics in Interpreting Research, (pp. 61-71). University of Turku Press.

Setton, R., & Dawrant, A. (2016). Conference Interpreting. A Complete Course. John Benjamins.

Timarova, Š. (2008). Working memory and simultaneous interpreting. In P. Boulonge (ed.), Translation and Its Others. Selected Papers of the CETRA Research Seminar in Translation Studies 2007, (pp. 1-28). http://www.kuleuven.be/cetra/papers/papers.html.

Timarová, Š., Čeňková, I, Meylaerts, R., Hertog, E., Szmalec, A., & Duyck, W. (2014). Simultaneous interpreting and working memory executive control. Interpreting, 16 (2), 139-168. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.16.2.01tim

Wang, J. (2016). The relationship between working memory capacity and simultaneous interpreting performance. Interpreting, 18 (1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.18.1.01wan

Wang, B., & Li, T. (2015). An empirical study of pauses in Chinese-English simultaneous interpreting. Perspectives. Studies in Translatology, 23 (1), 124-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2014.948885

Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

Yudes, C., Macizo, P., & Bajo, T. (2011). The influence of expertise in simultaneous interpreting on non-verbal executive processes Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 309-319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00309

Zuo, J. (2014). Image schemata and visualisation in simultaneous interpreting training. The Interpreter & Translator Trainer 8 (2), 204-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2014.908553

Downloads

Published

2021-11-05

How to Cite

Naim, S. A. (2021). A Comparative Assessment of Listening Span and Self-Efficacy in Simultaneous Interpreting Training. Sendebar, 32, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.30827/sendebar.v32.16868

Issue

Section

Original Articles