Gender perspective as a dimension of democracy in schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i1.8237Palavras-chave:
coeducation, democracy, diversity, gender, gender discriminationResumo
Otherness, the recognition of the non-hegemonic other, is one of the dimensions to work on in the construction of democracy in schools. In this article, we analyse the relationship between sex and gender, and democracy, based on case analysis of five preschool and primary education centres in Catalonia. In each centre, democracy occupies a prominent place in the educational project.
The main finding emphasizes that these centres, where democracy is a cornerstone, seldom consider the dimension of gender perspective. Therefore, gender equality policies, increasingly present in the guidelines and legislation of educational administrations, have little impact. However, in one of the centres analyzed, the democratic project is linked to social transformation, which does include gender relations. This is an example of implementation, from the bottom up, based on the reflection and participation of the entire educational community.
Downloads
Referências
Acker, S. (1994). Gendered education. UK: Open University Press.
Acker, S. (2003). Canadian teacher educators in time and place. Journal of Research in Teacher Education ,3-4, 69-85.
Acord Gov/ 2015, de 20 de gener, pel qual s’aprova el Pla per a la igualtat de gènere en el sistema educatiu (2015). Recovered from
Ainscow, M. (1995). Necesidades especiales en el aula. Guía para la formación del profesorado. Madrid: Narcea.
Agius, S., and C. Tobler (2012). Trans and Intersex People: Discrimination on the Grounds of Sex, Gender Identity and Gender Expression. Luxembourg: European Union.
Apple, M. W. (2012). Can Education Change Society? New York: Routledge.
Ballarín, P. (2004). Género y políticas educativas. Revista de Educación, 6, 35–42
Ballarín, P. (2005). El techo de cristal de los estudios de las mujeres. Critica, 923, 53-56
Bauman, S. (2005). Modernidad y ambivalencia. Barcelona: Antrophos.
Booth, T. and Ainscow M. (1998). From them to us: An International study of inclusion in education. London: Routledge.
Carbonell, S., Cantero, N., Navarro, M., & Melgar, P. (2016). Modelo Comunitario de Convivencia en Educación Primaria. Informació Psicológica, 111, 91-102.
Coll, C., and Edwards D. (2006). Enseñanza, aprendizaje y discurso en el aula. Aproximaciones al estudio del discurso educacional. Madrid: Fundación Infancia y Aprendizaje
Coombes, P; and Dananher G. (2006). From the margins to the centre: the power of transformative learning in Australia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(7), 759-765. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.029
Cornell, D., Gregory, A., Huang, F., & Fan, X. (2013). Perceived prevalence of bullying and teasing predicts high school dropout rates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 138-149.
Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32000L0043
Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (2000). Recovered from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32000L0078
Crawford,M., and Chaffin R. (1997). The Meanings of Difference: Cognition in Social and Cultural Context. In Gender Differences in Human Cognition, edited by P. J. Caplan, et al., 81–130.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Díaz-Aguado, M. J., Martínez R., and Martín J. (2013). El acoso entre adolescentes en España. Prevalencia, papeles adoptados por todo el grupo y características a las que atribuyen la victimización. Revista de educación, 362, 348-379.
European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey (2009). Main Results Report 2009.
Fernández N., and González N. (2015). LOMCE on the CEDAW’s light. An analysis of the last coeducation education reform. Journal of supranational policies of education, 3, 242-263.
REMOVED FOR PEER REVIEW PURPOSES
Flecha, C. (1996). Las primeras universitarias en España, 1872-1910. Madrid: Narcea Ediciones.
Flecha, R., Puigvert, L. and Rios, O. (2013). The New Alternative Masculinities and the overcoming of gender violence. RIMCIS: Revista Internacional y Multidisciplinar en Ciencias Sociales, 2(1), 88-113. Doi: 10.4471/rimcis.2013.14
FRA – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2013). EU LGBT survey European Union lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender survey Results at a glance.
Kanpol, B. (1997). Issues and trends in critical pedagogy. Cresswell, NJ: Hampton Press.
Keddie, A. (2008). Teacher stories of collusion and transformation: A feminist pedagogical framework for cultural gender justice. Journal of Education Policy, 23, 343–57. Doi: 10.1080/02680930801923815
Keddie, A. (2010). Feminist struggles to mobilise progressive spaces within the ‘boy-turn’ in gender equity and schooling reform. Gender and Education, 22(4), 353-368. Doi: 10.1080/09540250903289907
Knight, T. (2000). Inclusive Education and Educational Theory: Inclusive for What? Journal Melbourne Studies in Education, 41(1), 17-43. Doi: 10.1080/17508480009556342
Kosciw, J. G., Diaz, E. M. and Greytak E. A. (2008). 2007 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth in our nation’s schools. New York, NY: GLSEN
Lather, P. (1992) .Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post-structural perspectives. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 87–99. Doi: 10.1080/00405849209543529
Ley orgánica 1/1990, de 3 de octubre, de Ordenación General del Sistema Educativo de España (1990). Boletín Oficial del Estado. BOE, nº 238.
Ley orgánica 10/2002 de 23 de diciembre, de Calidad Educativa de la Educación. Boletín Oficial del Estado (2002). BOE, nº 307.
Ley orgánica 2/2006 de 3 de mayo, de Educación. (2006). Boletín Oficial del Estado. BOE, nº 106.
Ley 12/2009, del 10 de julio, de educación. (2009). Boletín Oficial del Estado. BOE, nº 189.
Lingard, B. (2003). Where to in gender policy in education after recuperative masculinity politics? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7(1), 33–56. Doi: 10.1080/13603110210143626
Meyer, E. (2009). Gender, Bullying and Harassment. New York: Teachers College Press.
Nash, M., and Marre, D. (2003). El desafío de la diferencia: representaciones culturales e identidades de género, raza y clase. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.
Puigvert, L. (2001). Las otras mujeres. Barcelona: El Roure.
Ramos, G. (2008). Hacia la democracia sexual en la escuela. ORG & DEMO, 9(1/2), 183-200.
Save the Children. (2015). Yo a eso no juego. Bullying y ciberbullying en la infancia. Recovered from https://www.savethechildren.es/sites/default/files/imce/docs/yo_a_eso_no_juego.pdf
Scalon, G. (1982). Revolución burguesa e instrucción femenina. Nuevas perspectivas sobre la mujer. II Jornadas de investigación interdisciplinaria. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma.
Suberviola, I. (2012). Coeducación: un derecho y un deber del profesorado. REIFOP, 15(3), 59-67
Taylor, C. (1994). Multiculturalisme. Différence et démocratie. París: Aubier
Tyack, D., and Cuban, L. (2001). En busca de la utopía. Un siglo de reformas de las escuelas públicas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Viñao, A. (2002). Sistemas educativos, culturas escolares y reformas: continuidades y cambios. Madrid: Morata.
West,C., and Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing Gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151. Doi: 10.1177/0891243287001002002
