Degrees of reflection in academic development: Construction and application of a tool to assess critical reflection in portfolios and projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i2.15227Palavras-chave:
college of education, evaluation, measuring instrument, research project, teacher education, universityResumo
Academic development based on ‘reflective practice’ consists of observing, analysing and reflecting on teacher practice in order to improve students’ learning processes. Participants of the 10 ECTS programme of the Centre for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, choose between the development of a reflective portfolio or a project on their teaching practice based on the premises of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL). We conducted a study to better understand the reflective processes of participants expressed in their portfolios or projects with the overall aim to improve the support to their professional development as teachers. The obtained results provided a foundation for the re-design of the programme in terms of analysing the reflective practice with the use of a reflective analysis tool. Our main research questions were: How can we assess the quality of reflection in portfolios and projects? What dimensions of reflection can be found? At what level of reflectivity do our participants operate? To answer these questions, and based on an extensive literature review, we first developed a model and two rubrics to assess the quality of reflection in written texts. Second, portfolios and projects of participants were analysed with the rubrics and semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with the same participants. Results show differences in the reflective processes between projects and portfolios; that the difference in teaching experience influences the quality of reflection in both text types but that also the motivation and fulfilment of entry expectations conditions the reflection level in learning processes.Downloads
Referências
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison Wesley.
Bachmann, H. (2015). Hochschuldidaktik mit Wirkung: Evidenzbasierte Hochschuldidaktik - eine Evaluationsstudie. UVW.
Bleakey, A. (1999). From reflexive practice to holistic reflexivity, Studies in Higher Education, 24, 315-330. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379925
Bloxham, S., & Boyd, P. (2007). Developing effective assessment in higher education: A practical guide. McGraw-Hill International.
Boud, D., Keogh, R. & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Kogan Page.
Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Jossey-Bass.
Brockbank, A. & MacGill, I. (2008). El aprendizaje reflexivo en la educación superior. Morata.
Clegg, S. (2000). Knowing through reflective practice in higher education. Educational Action Research, 8(3), 451-467. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790000200128
Creswell, J.W. (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educational process. Heath.
Engfer, D.; Feixas, M.; Zellweger, F.; Zimmermann, T.; Bührer, Z. & Flepp, G. (Junio 2019). Reflectivity in heterogeneous groups in higher education – the use of portfolios and projects to support individual reflective processes (538-545). Presentación llevada a cabo en The 3rd EuroSoTL Conference, Universidad del País Vasco, Bilbao. Recovered from https://www.ehu.eus/en/web/eurosotl-2019/proceedings
Feixas, M., & Zellweger, F. (2018). Formación e innovación docente universitaria para una educación transformadora: la investigación e indagación reflexiva como requisito. El Guiniguada. Revista de Investigaciones y Experiencias en Ciencias de la Educación, 28, 42-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.20420/ElGuiniguada.2019.265
Fund, Z. Court, D., & Kramarski, B. (2002). Construction and application of an evaluative tool to assess reflection in teacher-training courses. Assessment and evaluation in higher education, 27(6), 485-499. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000020264
Ghaye, T. & Lillyman, S. (Eds.) (2000). Caring moments: The discourse of reflective practice. Wiltshire.
Huber, L. (2014). Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Konzept, Geschichte, Formen, Entwicklungsaufgaben. En L. Huber, A. Pilniok, R. Sethe, B. Szczyrba & M. Vogel (Hrsg.), Forschendes Lehren im eigenen Fach. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Beispielen, (pp. 19-36). Bertelsmann.
Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., & Kwan, K. P. (2002). Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 411–425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009294
Kreber, C. & Cranton, P. A. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 476-496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2000.11778846
Larsson, M.; Anderberg, E. & Olsson, T. (2013). Researching the transformation in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning through teaching portfolios and conference papers: A reflection at the institutional level. En Anderberg, E.; Booth, S.; Cameron; A.; Kindeberg, T.; Larsson, M.; Olsson, T.; Osman, R.; Pitso, T. & Woollacott, L. (2013). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: On its constitution and transformative potential. 99-120. Unpublished document.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
Oppl, S. (2018). Zum Umgang mit Heterogenität in gestaltungsorientierten Lehrveranstaltungen durch Flipped-Classroom-Formate und Design-Thinking-Projekte. Conference paper. 7. Tag der Lehre, FH St. Pölten, Austria.
O’Sullivan P.S., & Irby D.M. (2014). Promoting Scholarship in Faculty Development: Relevant Research Paradigms and Methodologies. In: Steinert Y. (Hrsg.). Faculty Development in the Health Professions. Innovation and Change in Professional Education, Vol 11. Springer.
Ruiz Olabuénaga, J.I. (2012). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Universidad de Deusto.
Schön, D. (1998). El profesional reflexivo. Cómo piensan los profesionales cuando actúan. Paidós.
Trigwell, K. (2013). Evidence of the Impact of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Purposes, Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 95–105. doi: https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.95
Van Manen, M. (1992). Reflectivity and the pedagogical moment: the normativity of pedagogical thinking and acting. The Journal of Curriculum Studies. 23(6), 507-536. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027910230602
