The Theme of Sapphic Love through Three Works by Marina Tsvetaeva. Girlfriend, Letter to the Amazon and Sonechka’s Tale, a Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/impossibilia.272024.29758Keywords:
Tsvetaeva, Comparative Literature, Sapphic Writing, Russian Literature, Silver AgeAbstract
This paper aims to analyse the sapphic elements in the Marina Tsvetaeva’s work from a literary theory perspective, focusing on the theme of sapphic desire and the motives attached to its different forms. To do so, we will deepen on the matter through the study of the poem collection Girlfriend, the Letter to the Amazon and Sonechka’s Tale. These works represent three different ways of formalising the sapphic relations and consequently operate with different machanisms. This form divergence affects the presence and evolution of the various motives associated with the theme. Thus, they operate through different mechanisms the presence and evolution of the various motives associated with the theme, such as the youngest-eldest roles in sapphic love, the erotic conception of desire or the gestural importance of hands.
Downloads
References
BURGIN, Diana (1991). Signs of a Response: Two Possible Parnok Replies to Her "Podruga". The Slavic and East European Journal, (35), 214-227.
BURGIN, Diana (1995). Mother Nature versus the Amazons: Marina Tsvetaeva and Female Same-Sex Love. Journal of the History of Sexuality, (6), 62-88.
BURGOS, Elizabeth (ed.) (1991). Carta a la amazona y otros escritos franceses. Madrid: Hiperión.
CIXOUS, Hélène (1991a). Readings: The Poetics of Blanchot, Joyce, Kafka, Kleist, Lispector, and Tsvetayeva. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
CIXOUS, Hélène (1991b). La bella y los héroes la bella y los eros la bella y los ceros. En TSVIETÁIEVA, Marina. Carta a la Amazona (141-155). Madrid: Hiperión.
EVGRASHKINA, Ekaterina (2011). «Сафическиӣ» дискурс: ключи к пониманию некоторых текстов С. Я. Парнок и М. И. Цветаевоӣ («Saficheski» diskurs: kliuchi k ponimaniu nekotorij tekstov S. Я. Párnok i M. I. Tsvietáievoi. Discurso «sáfico»: claves para entender los textos de S. Я. Párnok y M. I. Tsvietáieva). Современыӣ дискурс анализ (2), 49-56.
LUQUE, Aurora (ed.) (2020). Poemas y testimonios. Acantilado: Madrid.
PÁRNOK, Sofía (1983). Стихи Парнок к Цветаевоӣ (Stiji Párok k Tsvietáievoi. Poemas de Párnok a Tsvietáieva). En POLYAKOVA, Sofia. Незакатные оны дни: Цветаева и Парнок (Nezakatnye ony dni: Tsvietáieva i Párnok. Aquellos días sin ocaso: Tsvietáieva y Párnok). Ardis: Michigan.
MCCORKLE, Karina (2019). Those Strange Moscow Ladies: Queer Identity in the Poetry of Tsvetaeva and Parnok. [Tesis doctoral]. Carolina del Norte: University of Northe Carolina at Chapel Hill.
TSVIETÁIEVA, Marina (1983). М. Цветаева «Подруга» (M. Tsvietáieva «Podruga». M. Tsvietáieva «La amiga»). En POLYAKOVA, Sofia. Незакатные оны дни: Цветаева и Парнок (Nezakatnye ony dni: Tsvietáieva i Párnok. Aquellos días sin ocaso). Ardis: Michigan.
TSVIETÁIEVA, Marina (1987). Índices terrestres. París: Clémence Hiver.
TSVIETÁIEVA, Marina (1991a). El diablo. Madrid: Alianza.
TSVIETÁIEVA, Marina (1991b). Carta a la Amazona y otros escritos. Madrid: Hiperión.
TSVIETÁIEVA, Marina (2002). El relato de Sóniechka. Barcelona: Universitat Jaume I.
TSVIETÁIEVA, Marina (2012). Cartas del verano de 1926. Barcelona: Minúscula.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Impossibilia. Revista Internacional de Estudios Literarios
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following terms: You must give appropriate credit, you may not use the material for commercial purposes and No Derivatives. Commits to respecting third party intellectual property rights.
Reception and proccesing of papers has no costs for authors.
Author assumes responsibility for the ideas contained in the article.
Papers must be original and must not have been published before and at the moment they are submitted, papers should not be in the process of evaluation by any other electronic or printed media.
The authors are allowed and recommended to publish their published work through the internet. It could produced interesting exchanges and increase the published work citation. (See El efecto del acceso abierto).