Framing immigrants as seekers of social benefits: the impact of the Great Recession at the family-level and the development of anti-immigrant anxieties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/tsg-gsw.v9i16.8494Palabras clave:
Immigration, Great Recession, social welfare, transnationalism, social rightsResumen
Substantial research has addressed the association between economic factors (e.g., employment rate) and perception of immigrants among the general public in the host societies. This study used the Transatlantic Trends Survey 2014 to examine whether the characterization of immigrants as social benefits seekers is related to one´s family financial situation being greatly affected by the Great Recession. We conducted a series of ordinal logistic regressions to compare three different geopolitical contexts, namely the United States, the Southern Europe region, and the triad France-Germany-United Kingdom. Our results confirmed that framing immigrants as social benefits seekers is indeed related to one´s family being greatly impacted by the Great Recession. Significantly, the direction of such association varies among contexts, as those greatly impacted by the crisis in Southern Europe showed lower odds of framing immigrants as social benefits seekers, while the opposite happening in both the United States and the triad France-Germany-United Kingdom. Recommendations for practice and research are discussed.
Descargas
Citas
Abrajano, M. & Hajnal, Z. L. (2015). White backlash: immigration, race, and American politics. Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Alba, R., Rumbaut, R. G. & Marotz, K. (2005). A distorted nation: Perceptions of racial/ethnic group sizes and attitudes toward immigrants and other minorities. Social Forces, 84(2), 901-919.
Betts, A. (2013). Survival migration: Failed governance and the crisis of displacement. New York: Cornell University Press.
Binder, N. E., Polinard, J. L. & Wrinkle, R. D. (1997). Mexican American and Anglo attitudes toward immigration reform: A view from the border. Social Science Quarterly, 324-337.
Bommes, M. & Geddes, A. (Eds.). (2003). Immigration and welfare: challenging the borders of the welfare state. London and New York: Routledge.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2012). BLS Spotlight on Statistics: The Recession of 2007–2009. Retrieved from
http://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2012/recession/pdf/recession_bls_spotlight.pdf
Burns, P. & Gimpel, J. G. (2000). Economic insecurity, prejudicial stereotypes, and public opinion on immigration policy. Political science quarterly, 115(2), 201-225.
Castles, S., De Haas, H. & Miller, M. J. (2013) (5th edition). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. New York: Guilford Press.
Castles, S. & Schierup C. (2012). Migration and Ethnic Minorities. In Francis G. Castles, Stephan Leibfried, Jane Lewis, Herbert Obinger & Christopher Pierson (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of the welfare state (pp.278-291). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cates, J (2016). Social Work History: A Structural View. In Mattaini, Holtshneider & Lowery (Eds). Foundations of Social Work Practice (5th edition, pp 43-80). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Chandler, C. R. & Tsai, Y. M. (2001). Social factors influencing immigration attitudes: an analysis of data from the General Social Survey. The Social Science Journal, 38(2), 177-188.
D’Amuri, F. & Peri, G. (2014). Immigration, jobs, and employment protection: evidence from Europe before and during the great recession. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(2), 432-464.
Dustmann, C., & Preston, I. P. (2007). Racial and economic facto
rs in attitudes to immigration. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 7(1).
Elsby, M. W., Hobijn, B. & Sahin, A. (2010). The labor market in the Great Recession. National Bureau of Economic Research, working papers nº 15979. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w15979
Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M. & Armstrong, T. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social issues, 57(3), 389-412.
Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of social issues, 54(4), 699-724.
Eurostat. (2018). Migration and migrant population statistics. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/pdfscache/1275.pdf
Faist, T. (2009). Diversity –a new mode of incorporation? Ethnic and racial studies, 32(1), 171-190.
Faist, T., Faust, M., & Reisenauer, E. (2013). Transnational migration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Feldmann, A., & Olea, H. (2004). New Formulas, Old Sins: Human Rights Abuses Against Migrant Workers, Asylum Seekers, and Refugees in the Americas. From the Margins of Globalization: Critical Perspectives on Human Rights, 129-159.
Fiddian-Qasmiye, E., Loescher, G., Long, K., & Sigona, N. (2014). Introduction. In Elena Fiddian-Qasmiye, Gil Loescher, Kay Long and Nando Sigona (Eds). The Oxford Handbook on Refugees and Forced Migration (pp. 1-19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Filindra, A. & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2013). Together in good times and bad? How economic triggers condition the effects of intergroup threat. Social Science Quarterly, 94(5), 1328-1345.
Fix, M., Papademetriou, D. G., Batalova, J., Terrazas, A., Lin, S. Y. Y. & Mittelstadt, M. (2009). Migration and the global recession. Migration Policy Institute, 2.
Goldstein, J. L. & Peters, M. E. (2014). Nativism or economic threat: Attitudes toward immigrants during the great recession. International Interactions, 40(3), 376-401.
Groves, R. M., Fowler Jr, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E. & Tourangeau, R. (2011). Survey methodology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Haynes, C., Merolla, J. & Ramakrishnan, S. K. (2016). Framing immigrants: News coverage, public opinion, and policy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Helbling, M. (2014). Framing Immigration in Western Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(1), 21-41.
Hurd, M. D. & Rohwedder, S. (2010a). Effects of the financial crisis and great recession on American households. National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper nº 16407. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w16407
____________ (2010b). The Effects of the Economic Crisis on the Older Population. University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center, working paper nº 2010-231. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1710142
International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2017). World Migration Report 2018. Retrieved from https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2018_en.pdf
Jackson, J. W. (1993). Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. The Psychological Record 43(3), 395-413.
Jenkins, S. P., Brandolini, A., Micklewright, J. & Nolan, B. (Eds.). (2012). The great recession and the distribution of household income. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Katz, M. B. (2013). The undeserving poor: America's enduring confrontation with poverty: Fully updated and revised. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
López, G., Bialik, K. & Radford, J. (2017). Key findings about US immigrants. Pew Research Center, 3. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/30/key-findings-about-u-s-immigrants/
McKee, M., Karanikolos, M., Belcher, P. & Stuckler, D. (2012). Austerity: a failed experiment on the people of Europe. Clinical medicine, 12(4), 346-350.
Munnell, A. H. & Rutledge, M. S. (2013). The effects of the Great Recession on the retirement security of older workers. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 650(1), 124-142.
Petmesidou, M. & Guillén, A. M. (Eds.). (2017). Economic crisis and austerity in Southern Europe: threat or opportunity for a sustainable welfare state. Abingdon, U.K.: Routledge.
Reeskens, T. & Van Oorschot, W. (2012). Disentangling the ‘New Liberal Dilemma’: On the relation between general welfare redistribution preferences and welfare chauvinism. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 53(2), 120-139.
Schlueter, E., & Scheepers, P. (2010). The relationship between outgroup size and anti-outgroup attitudes: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test of group threat-and intergroup contact theory. Social Science Research, 39(2), 285-295.
Schneider, A. & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American political science review, 87(2), 334-347.
Semyonov, M., Raijman, R. & Gorodzeisky, A. (2006). The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988-2000. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 426-449.
Stelzenmueller, C., Isernia, P. & Eichenberg, R. (2014). Transatlantic Trends Survey, 2014. Ann Arbor -Michigan, USA-: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2015-07-24. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36138.v1
United Nations. (2018). The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. Intergovernmental agreement adopted by United Nations Member States in Morocco on 10 and 11 December 2018. Retrieved from
https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/sites/default/files/180711_final_draft_0.pdf
Van Der Waal, J., De Koster, W., & Van Oorschot, W. (2013). Three worlds of welfare chauvinism? How welfare regimes affect support for distributing welfare to immigrants in Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(2), 164-181.
Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation–state building, migration and the social sciences. Global networks, 2(4), 301-334.
Ybarra, V. D., Sánchez, L. M. & Sánchez, G. R. (2016). Anti-immigrant anxieties in state policy: the great recession and punitive immigration policy in the American states, 2005–2012. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 16(3), 313-339.
Zimmermann, K., Bauer, T. K. & Lofstrom, M. (2000). Immigration policy, assimilation of immigrants and natives' sentiments towards immigrants: evidence from 12 OECD-countries. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 7(2), 11-53.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Las personas autoras que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- Las personas autoras conservan los derechos de autoría, garantizando a Trabajo Social Global-Global Social Work el derecho a la primera publicación del trabajo que remiten a la revista para que sea sometido al preceso editorial.
- Autores y autoras conocen que su obra se publica bajo una Licencia Creative Commons que permite a otros compartirla con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Los/as autores/as ceden a Trabajo Social Global-Global Social Work los derechos de explotación de la obra que haya sido publicada en esta revista, autorizando a la Editorial de la misma para el ejercicio de una libre reproducción, distribución y comunicación pública. Autores y autoras conocen que su obra será almacenada en servidores y reproducida en soporte digital para su incorporación a repositorios institucionales y bases de datos que facilitarán el acceso libre y gratuito al texto completo de la obra.
- Los/as autores/as pueden distribuir la versión post-print de la obra publicada en TSG-GSW (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento expreso de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
Los derechos de copyright sobre los textos publicados en Trabajo Social Global-Global Social Work, así como la política editorial de la misma respecto al auto-archivo o depósito en repositorios institucionales o temáticos, están identificados en la base de datos Dulcinea.
