Adequacy, virality and interaction of the information on YouTube related to the treatment of curable sexually transmitted diseases

Authors

  • María Sanz-Lorente Universidad Miguel Hernández. Departamento de Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia, Campus de Sant Joan d’Alacant. Alicante. España. Consellería de Sanidad Universal y Salud Pública de la Generalitat Valenciana. Centro de Salud Pública. Manises. España.
  • María Chorro-Vicedo Universidad Miguel Hernández. Facultad de Farmacia, Campus de Sant Joan d’Alacant. Alicante. España.
  • Javier Sanz Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia. Univ. Miguel Hernández. Elche
  • Carmina Wanden-Berghe aInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL-FISABIO). Alicante. España. Hospital General Universitario de Alicante. Unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio. Alicante. España.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/ars.v60i2.8589

Keywords:

YouTube, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Therapeutics, Access to Information

Abstract

Objective: Evaluating the adequacy, virality/popularity and interaction of the information on YouTube related to the treatment of sexually transmitted diseases.

Methodology: A cross-sectional descriptive study that examines the information related to the treatment of, mainly curable, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) gathered from YouTube Spain videos. A simple search was conducted using the terms “treatment”, “sexual disease”, “syphilis”, “gonorrhoea”, “chlamydia” and “trichomoniasis”. The end date of the viewing and consultation was 26th September 2018.

Results: There was an increasing evolution in the number of videos uploaded to YouTube, confirming a model with a linear adjustment per the year of promotion (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.47; p = 0.001). The average age of all the videos related to the treatment of STDs was 2.79 ± 0.22 years, with a median of 2 and an IQR equal to 2 years, a maximum of 10 years and a minimum of 0 years. The average acceptance ratio was 88.09 ± 1.10%, with a median equal to 90.83%, an IQR of 8.62%, a maximum of 100% and a minimum of 50%. The most commonly observed STD was gonorrhoea, by itself (20, 25.00%) or with syphilis (2, 2.50%). The most used solution in the videos about STDs was the medicine registered in 59 videos (73.75%). The most present active substance was a group of these actives in 28 videos (35.00%) and the most used pharmaceutical form was also a group of these forms in 28 videos (35.00%).

Conclusions: Encouraging healthcare professionals to become more active on the Web 2.0, especially on YouTube, and to start their careers as content creators on the same level as people on dissemination channels. Furthermore, ensuring that patients verify and complement the information on YouTube videos during medical appointments with healthcare professionals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ReFaey K, Tripathi S, Yoon JW, Justice J, Kerezoudis P, Parney IF, et al. The reliability of YouTube videos in patients education for Glioblastoma Treatment. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;55:1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.07.001

Oller-Arlandis V, Oller-Arlandis VE. YouTube como fuente de información sanitaria y divulgación del conocimiento sobre Cuidados Paliativos en el domicilio. Hosp Domic. 2017;1(3):153-66. DOI: 10.22585/hospdomic.v1i3.23

Sanz-Lorente M, Wanden-Berghe C, Castejón-Bolea R, Sanz-Valero J. Web 2.0 tools in the prevention of curable sexually transmitted diseases: Scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e113. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8871

Kelly-Hedrick M, Grunberg PH, Brochu F, Zelkowitz P. “It’s totally okay to be sad, but never lose hope”: Content analysis of infertility-related videos on YouTube in relation to viewer preferences. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(5):e10199. DOI: 10.2196/10199

Lim K, Kilpatrick C, Storr J, Seale H. Exploring the use of entertainment-education YouTube videos focused on infection prevention and control. Am J Infect Control. 2018;46(11):1218-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.05.002

Albarracin D, Romer D, Jones C, Hall Jamieson K, Jamieson P. Misleading Claims About Tobacco Products in YouTube Videos: Experimental Effects of Misinformation on Unhealthy Attitudes. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e229. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9959

Oller-Arlandis VE. Calidad y pertinencia de la información existente en la Web 2.0 sobre medio ambiente [Tesis Doctoral]. Sant Joan d’Alacant, Alicante, España: Departamento de Salud Pública, Historia de la Ciencia y Ginecología, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche; 2016.

Sanz-Valero J, Castiel LD, Wanden-Berghe C, Juan Quilis V. Internet y la búsqueda de información en salud pública: desde la relevancia hacia la «revelancia». Gac Sanit. 2006;20(2):159-60. DOI: 10.1157/13087329

Novillo-Ortiz D. Sanidad digital y gestión del conocimiento: nuevos escenarios asistenciales para un sistema sanitario de excelencia. El Prof Inf. 2010;19(3):225-30. DOI: 3145/epi.2010.may.01

Konstantinidis S, Fernandez-Luque L, Bamidis P, Karlsen R. The role of taxonomies in social media and the semantic web for health education. A study of SNOMED CT terms in YouTube health video tags. Methods Inf Med. 2013;52(2):168-79. DOI: 10.3414/ME12-02-0005

Price DJ de S. Little Science, Big Science and Beyond. New York, USA: Columbia University Press; 1986.

Larrañaga Rubio J, Ruiz Molina AN. El modelo de negocio de YouTube. Rev ICONO 14. 2009;(12):109-31. DOI: 10.7195/ri14.v7i1.336

Guardiola-Wanden-Berghe R, Sanz-Valero J, Wanden-Berghe C. Eating Disorders Blogs: Testing the Quality of Information on the Internet. Eat Disord. 2010;18(2):148-52. DOI: 10.1080/10640260903585565

Sanz-Lorente M, Guardiola-Wanden-Berghe R. Evaluación de la calidad de las páginas Web sobre el Hospital a Domicilio: el Indicador de Credibilidad como factor pronóstico. Hosp Domic. 2017;1(2):73. DOI: 10.22585/hospdomic.v1i2.11

Gabarrón E, Fernández-Luque L. eHealth and online videos for health promotion. Gac Sanit. junio de 2012;26(3):197-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2012.03.004

West T. Going Viral: Factors That Lead Videos to Become Internet Phenomena. The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications. 2001;2(1):76-84.

Segarra-Saavedra J, Hidalgo-Marí T. Viralidad e interacción: Análisis del engagement de los diez anuncios más vistos en YouTube en España en 2016. Rev ICONO 14. 2018;16(1):47-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1069

Gallardo Camacho J, Alonso AJ. La baja interacción del espectador de vídeos en Internet: caso Youtube España. Rev Lat Comun Soc. 2010;65:421-35. DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-65-2010-910-421-435

Ortiz-Martinez Y, Ali-Salloum W, González-Ferreira F, Molinas-Argüello J. HIV videos on YouTube: helpful or harmful? Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93(7):481. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053197

López Marcos P, Sanz-Valero J. Presencia y adecuación de los principios activos farmacológicos en la edición española de la Wikipedia. Aten Primaria. 2013;45(2):101-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2012.09.012

Pathak R, Poudel DR, Karmacharya P, Pathak A, Aryal MR, Mahmood M, et al. YouTube as a Source of Information on Ebola Virus Disease. North Am J Med Sci. 2015;7(7):306-9. DOI: 10.4103/1947-2714.161244

Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M, Sood A, Singh G. YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(3):e1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.007

Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA. 2007;298(21):2482-4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.21.2482

Published

2019-06-20

How to Cite

1.
Sanz-Lorente M, Chorro-Vicedo M, Sanz J, Wanden-Berghe C. Adequacy, virality and interaction of the information on YouTube related to the treatment of curable sexually transmitted diseases. Ars Pharm [Internet]. 2019 Jun. 20 [cited 2024 May 19];60(2):109-17. Available from: https://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/ars/article/view/8589

Issue

Section

Original Articles