A comparative in vitro drug release prospective with two different polymers for the development of floating single unit dosage form of imatinib mesylate for chronic myelogenous leukemia

Authors

  • Kombath R Vinod Department of Pharmaceutics, Nalanda College of Pharmacy, Nalgonda, AndhraPradesh, India.
  • Vasa Santosh Department of Pharmaceutics, Nalanda College of Pharmacy, Nalgonda, AndhraPradesh, India.
  • Subhadra Sandhya Department of Pharmacognosy, Nalanda College of Pharmacy, Nalgonda, AndhraPradesh, India
  • Banji J Otilia Department of Pharmacology, Nalanda College of Pharmacy, Nalgonda, AndhraPradesh, India
  • Banji David Department of Pharmacology, Nalanda College of Pharmacy, Nalgonda, AndhraPradesh, India
  • Anugu Padmasri Department of Pharmaceutics, Nalanda College of Pharmacy, Nalgonda, AndhraPradesh, India.

Keywords:

Imatinib mesylate, gastroretention, floating tablets, in vitro buoyancy

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this investigation was to prepare a gastroretentive drug delivery system of Imatinib mesylate.

Materials and Method: Floating tablets of imatinib mesylate were prepared employing HPMC K4M and HPMC K15M by effervescent technique; these grades of HPMC were evaluated for their gel forming properties. Sodium bicarbonate was incorporated as a gas-generating agent. The floating tablets were evaluated for uniformity of weight, hardness, friability, drug content, in vitro buoyancy and dissolution studies.

Results: The prepared tablets exhibited satisfactory physico-chemical characteristics. All the prepared batches showed good in vitro buoyancy. The tablet swelled radially and axially during in vitro buoyancy studies. It was observed that the tablet remained buoyant for >12 hours. The tablets with HPMC K4M were found to float for longer duration as compared with formulations containing HPMC K15M. The drug release from the tablets was sufficiently sustained and non-Fickian transport of the drug from tablets was confirmed. From the radiographic pictures obtained at different time intervals, it has been proved that that the tablet was floating during the observed time intervals up to 6h against all peristaltic movements.

Conclusion: Gastric retention of Imatinib mesylate unit dosage form was achived by floatation. HPMC K4 gave better release up to 98.4% in 12 hrs. All the gastroretentive floating tablets showed good floatation during the period of drug release, and the drug release was found to follow non-fickian diffusion type.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shweta A, Ali J, Ahuja A, Roop Khar K, Sanjula B. Floating drug delivery systems: a review. AAPS Pharm SciTech. 2005; (6): 372-90.

Garg R, Gupt GD. Progress in controlled gastroretentive delivery systems. Trop J Pharm Res. 2008; (7): 1055-66.

Sun W, Jung W, Sung H, Jeong H, Moohi Y, Dong H et al. Gastroretentive drug delivery system of DA-6034, a new flavonoid derivative, for the treatment of gastritis. Int j pharm. 2008; (3): 88–94.

Shah SH, Patel K, Pundarikakshudu K, Patel NV. An overview of gastroretentive floating drug delivery system. Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2009; (4): 65-80.

Suresh B, Chandramohan E, Ashok T, Madhusudhan Y. Formulation and evaluation of multiple tablets as a biphasic gastroretentive floating drug delivery systems for fenoverine. Acta pharm. 2010; (60): 89-97.

Jain SK, Awasthi AM, Jain NK, Agrawal GP. Calcium silicate based microsphere of ripaglinide for gastroretentive floating drug delivery: preparation and in vitro characterization. J Cont Rel. 2005; (107): 300-9.

Whitehead L, Collett JH, Fell JT. Amoxicillin release from a floating dosage form based on alginates. Int j pharm. 2000; (210): 45-9.

Menon A, Ritschel WA, Sakr A. Development and evaluation of a monolithic floating dosage form for furosemide. J Pharm Sci. 1994; (83): 239-45.

Janardhan D, Lingam M, Krishna C, Venkateswarlu V. Formulation and invitro evaluation of gastroretentive drug delivery system for ranitidine hydrochloride. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotech. 2010; (1): 227-32.

Pratiban KG, Senthil B, Manivannan R, Sanjeevi D. Once daily gastroretentive mucoadhesive cephalexin monohydrate tablet: formulation and invitro evaluation. In J Pharm Sci Res. 2010; (1): 89-98.

Strusi OQ, Sanvico F, Bettini R, Santi P, Colombo G, BarataP et al. Module assemblage technology for floating systems: invitro floatation and invivo gastro-retention. J control release. 2008; (12): 88-92.

Sato Y, Kawashima Y, Hirofumi T, Hiromitsu Y. Invitro and invivo evaluation of riboflavin containing microballons for a floating controlled drug delivery system in healthy humans. Int j pharm. 2004; (275): 97-107.

Raja Sekharan T, Palanichamy S, Shanmuganathan S, Tamilvanan S, Thanga Thirupath A. Formulation and evaluation of theophyllin controlled release matrix tablets using guar gum. Ars Pharm. 2009; 50(4): 205-14.

Ozdemir N, Ordu S, Ozkan Y. Studies of floating dosage forms of furosemide: invitro and invivo evaluation of bilayer tablet formulations. Drug dev ind pharm. 2000; (26):857-66.

Suriyaprakash TNK, Prabu SL, Satyam T. In-vitro studies of diclofenac sodium controlled-release dosage from biopolymeric hydrophilic matrices. Ars Pharm. 2011; 52(2): 20-4.

Sasa B, Julijana K, Franc V, Bojan Z. Optimization of floating matrix tablets and evaluation of their gastric residence time. Int j pharm. 2000; (195): 125-35.

Vinay P, Suresh S, Joshi H. Gastroretentive drug delivery system of amoxicillin: formulation and invitro evaluation. International journal of pharma and bio sciences (India). 2010; (1): 1-10.

Mishra SK, Pathak K. Formulation and evaluation of oil entrapped gastroretentive floating gel beads of loratadine. Acta Pharm. 2008; (58): 187-97.

Published

2012-12-20

How to Cite

1.
Vinod KR, Santosh V, Sandhya S, Otilia BJ, David B, Padmasri A. A comparative in vitro drug release prospective with two different polymers for the development of floating single unit dosage form of imatinib mesylate for chronic myelogenous leukemia. Ars Pharm [Internet]. 2012 Dec. 20 [cited 2024 Jul. 22];53(4):01-7. Available from: https://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/ars/article/view/4685

Issue

Section

Original Articles