Mauvaises herbes

Auteurs-es

  • Heather Sullivan Trinity University

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.30827/tn.v7i2.28982

Mots-clés :

études critiques végétales, science fiction, contes de fées, forêts, Frères Grimm, Ludwik Tieck, anthropocène, plantes extraterrestres

Résumé

Les « mauvaises herbes » mettent en lumière le pouvoir inattendu et surprenant des plantes, bien souvent négligées dans nos sociétés industrielles qui traitent les végétaux comme de simples ressources et non comme des êtres capables de transformer notre monde. La science-fiction et les contes de fées, grâce à leur vision plus animiste de sujets non-humains, présentent une base d’étude idéale nous permettant de reconsidérer les relations culturelles et écologiques entre les plantes et les hommes, suivant une approche critique du monde végétal. Citons par exemple le roman de science-fiction de Jack McDevitt, Deepsix (2001), ou le conte de fées de Ludwig Tieck, « Faithful Eckart and Tannhäuser » (1799), qui introduisent le lecteur à ces « mauvaises herbes » dont la force ramène les hommes dans un cycle de renouveau de la vie végétale, ce qu’ils pensaient impossible dû aux avancées culturelles ou technologiques de leurs sociétés. Pour McDevitt, ces « mauvaises herbes » se présentent sous la forme de fleurs prédatrices sur une planète extraterrestre; quant à Tieck, des cavernes remplies de fleurs protègent Vénus, au fin fond de montagnes boisées. Les bourgeons, ouvertement sexualisés, attirent les hommes alors forcés de retourner dans un cycle botanique, démontrant les rapports à la fois usuels et cachés entre ces deux mondes. Ces interprétations remarquables de « mauvaises herbes » contiennent de profondes, et parfois troublantes, vérités écologiques sur notre immersion et dépendance envers l’univers photosynthétique qui nous entoure.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Références

Aldiss, Brian. Hothouse. 1962. New York, Open Road Integrated Media, 2015.

Ballard, James G. The Drowned World. 1962. New York, Liveright Publishing, 2012.

Beresford-Kroeger, Diana. To Speak for the Trees: My Life’s Journey from Ancient Celtic Wisdom to a Healing Vision of the Forest. Toronto, Random House Canada, 2019.

Bishop, Katherine E.; David Higgins and Jerry Määttä, editors. Plants in Science Fiction: Speculative Vegetation. Cardiff, University of Wales Press, 2020.

Bottigheimer, Ruth. Grimms’ Bad Girls & Bold Boys: The Moral & Social Vison of the Tales. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1987.

Brown, H. Claire. “Attack of the Superweeds”. The New York Times Magazine, 22 Aug. 2021, pp. 24-33.

Burke, Sue. Semiosis. New York, Tor, 2018.

____. Interference. New York, Tor, 2019.

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “The Climate of History”. Critical Inquiry, vol. 35, no. 2, 2009, pp. 197-222.

Clark, Timothy. Ecocriticism on the Edge: The Anthropocene as a Threshold Concept. London, Bloomsbury, 2015.

Coccia, Emanuele. The Life of Plants: A Metaphysics of Mixture, translated by Dylan J. Montanari, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2019.

Crutzen, Paul and Eugene F. Stoermer. “The Anthropocene”. Global Change Newsletter, no. 41, 2000, pp. 17-18.

Dürbeck, Gabriele; Caroline Schaumann and Heather I. Sullivan. “Human and Non-human Agencies in the Anthropocene”. Ecozon@, vol. 6, no. 1, 2015, pp. 118-36.

Eichendorff, Joseph Freiherr von. “The Marble Statue”. German Literary Fairy Tales, edited and translated by Frank G. Ryder, New York, Continuum, 1992, pp. 133-71.

Ellis, John M. One Fairy Story too Many: The Brothers Grimm and Their Tales. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1983.

Gagliano, Monica. Thus Spoke the Plant: A Remarkable Journey of Groundbreaking Scientific Discoveries & Personal Encounters with Plants. Berkeley, North Atlantic Books, 2018.

Gagliano, Monica; John C. Ryan and Patrícia Vieira, editors. The Language of Plants: Science, Philosophy, Literature. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2017.

Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. London, Routledge, 2012.

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang Goethe. Amtliche Schriften Teil I. vol. 26, edited by Reinhard Kluge, Frankfurt am Main, Klassiker, 1998.

Gray, Richard. “Red Herrings and Blue Smocks: Ecological Destruction, Commercialism, and Anti-Semitism in Annette von Droste-Hülshoff’s ‘Die Judenbuche’”. German Studies Review, vol. 26, no. 3, 2003, pp. 515-542.

Grebenstein, Emily. “Escape of the Invasives: Top Six Invasive Plants Species in the United States”. Smithsonian Insider, 19 Apr. 2013. https://www.si.edu/stories/escape-invasives 2 May 2024.

Grimm Brothers. The Complete Fairy Tales of the Brothers Grimm. 1987. Translated and introduced by Jack Zipes, New York, Bantam, 2002.

Brüder Grimm. Grimms Kinder und Hausmärchen, edited by Heinz Rölleke, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1999.

Hamilton, Clive; Christophe Bonneuil and François Gemenne, editors. The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch. London, Routledge, 2015.

Harrison, Robert Pogue. Forests: The Shadow of Civilization. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1992.

Heidegger, Martin. “Die Frage nach der Technik”. Vorträge und Aufsätze, edited by Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, Frankfurt am Main, Vittorio Klostermann, 2000, pp. 5-36.

Hermand, Jost. “‘The Death of the Trees Will Be the End of Us All’: Protests Against the Destruction of German Forests 1780-1950”. The Journal of Garden History, vol. 14, no. 3, 1994, pp. 147-157.

Jacobs, Joela. “These Lusting, Incestuous, Perverse Creatures: A Phytopoetic History of Plants and Sexuality”. Environmental Humanities, vol. 14, no. 3, 2022, pp. 602-617.

Keetley, Dawn and Angela Tenga, editors. Plant Horror: Approaches to the Monstrous Vegetal in Fiction and Film. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

Kimmerer, Robin Wall. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants. Minneapolis, Milkweed, 2013.

Korff, Hermann A. Geist der Goethezeit, vol. III. Liepzig, Koehler and Amelang, 1964.

Kramer, Anke. “Pflanzen in Phantasus: Tiecks Elfen und die ökologische Kränkung des Menschen”. Literaturen und Kulturen des Vegetabilen. Plant Studies — Kulturwissenschaftliche Pflanzenforschung, edited by Urte Stobbe and Anke Kramer, Berlin, Peter Lang, 2022, pp. 291-309.

Latour, Bruno. “Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene”. New Literary History, vol. 45, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1-18.

Le Guin, Ursula K. The Word for World is Forest. New York, Tor, 1972.

Mabey, Richard. Weeds: In Defense of Nature’s Most Unloved Plants. New York, HarperCollins, 2011.

Macfarlane, Robert. Underland: A Deep Time Journey. New York, Norton, 2019.

MacRae, Gavin. “Will Climate Change Threaten Earth’s Other ‘Lung’?”. TheRevelator, 16 Apr. 2020, https://therevelator.org/phytoplankton-climate-change/ 2 May 2024.

Maierhoffer, Waltraud. “Goethe and Forestry”. Invaluable Trees: Cultures of Nature, 1660-1830, edited by Laura Auricchio, Elizabeth Heckendorn Cook and Giula Pacini, Oxford, Voltaire Foundation, 2021, pp. 265-280.

Maitland, Sara. From the Forest: A Search for the Hidden Roots of Our Fairy Tales. Berkeley, Counterpoint, 2012.

McDevitt, Jack. Deepsix. New York, HarperCollins, 2001.

Morton, Timothy. “How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Term Anthropocene”. Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry, vol. 1, no. 2, 2014, pp. 257-264.

Nixon, Rob. Slow Violence: Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2011.

Nollendorfs, Cora Lee. “The Kiss of the Supernatural: Tieck’s Treatment of a Familiar Legend”. Fairy Tales as Ways of Knowing: Essays on Märchen in Psychology, Society and Literature, edited by Michael M. Metzger and Katharina Mommsen, Bern, Peter Lang, 1980, pp. 154-167.

Plumwood, Val. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. London, Routledge, 2001.

Pollan, Michael. The Botany of Desire: A Plant’s Eye View of the World. New York, Random House, 2001.

Reichholf, Josef H. Der Tanz um das goldene Kalb: Der Ökokolonialismus Europas. Berlin, Klaus Wagenbach, 2006.

Schaefer, John R. “Venus Flytrap: Queen of Carnivorous Plants”. Plant Humanities Lab, https://lab.plant-humanities.org/venus_flytrap/ 2 May 2024.

Sheldrake, Merlin. Entangled Live: How Fungi Make Our Worlds, Change Our Minds & Shape Our Futures. New York, Random House, 2020.

Simard, Suzanne. Finding the Mother Tree: Discovering the Wisdom of the Forest. New York, Knopf, 2021.

Steffen, Will; Paul J. Crutzen and John R. McNeill. “The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?”. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, vol. 36, no. 8, 2007, pp. 614-621.

Stobbe, Urte; Anke Kramer and Berbeli Wanning, editors. Literaturen und Kulturen des Vegetabilen: Plant Studies — Kulturwissenschaftliche Pflanzenforschung. Berlin, Peter Lang, 2022.

Storl, Wolf-Dieter. Die alte Göttin und ihre Pflanzen: Wie wir durch Märchen zu unserer Urspiritualität finden. München, Kailash Verlag, 2014.

Taiz, Lincoln and Lee Taiz. Flora Unveiled: The Discovery & Denial of Sex in Plants. New York, Oxford University Press, 2017.

Tatar, Maria. The Hard Facts of the Grimms’ Fairy Tales. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1987.

Tieck, Ludwig. “Faithful Eckart and Tannhäuser”. Tales From the “Phantasus”, etc. of Ludwig Tieck, edited and translated by James Burns, London, Robson, Levey, and Franklyn, 1845. Kindle Edition, pp. 68-94. (Ludwig Tieck. “Der getreue Eckart und Der Tannenhäuser”. Phantasus, edited by Manfred Frank, Frankfurt am Main, Klassiker, 1985, pp. 149-83.)

Turner, Kay. “At Home in the Realm of Enchantment: The Queer Enticements of the Grimms' ‘Frau Holle’”. Marvels & Tales, vol. 29, no. 1, 2015, pp. 42-63.

Wagner, Richard. Tannhäuser: Romantische Oper. Online: https://www.murashev.com/opera/Tannh%C3%A4user_libretto_English_German 2 May 2024.

Wandersee, James H. and Elisabeth E. Schussler. “Toward a Theory of Plant Blindness”. Plant Science Bulletin, vol. 47, no. 1, 2001, pp. 2-9.

Wells, Larry D. “Sacred and Profane: A Spatial Archetype in the Early Tales of Ludwig Tieck”. Monatshefte, vol. 70, no. 1, 1978, pp. 29-44.

Zipes, Jack. When Dreams Come True: Classical Fairy Tales and Their Tradition. New York, Routledge, 1999.

Publié-e

2024-07-30

Comment citer

Sullivan, H. (2024). Mauvaises herbes. Theory Now. Journal of Literature, Critique, and Thought, 7(2), 12–36. https://doi.org/10.30827/tn.v7i2.28982

Numéro

Rubrique

Dossier. L'Écocritique au XXIe siècle (et dans les siècles à venir) : Plantes, Animaux, Futuribles