Queering the canon in Middlemarch the series. Collaborative Digital Creation and the Crisis in the Humanities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/tn.v6i2.27902Keywords:
Vlogging, Crisis in culture, Georges Eliot, Middlemarch, Rebecca Shoptaw, Computational subjectivation, Queer, ResonanceAbstract
In “The Crisis in Culture”, Hannah Arendt argues that moments of rupture from the tradition can have a revitalising force by pushing individuals to become politicised. In the contemporary world the crisis is everywhere and humanities colleges, often seen as the last bastions of a declining world, are hamstrung by underfunding when not scrapped altogether. In this context, Rebecca Shoptaw’s Middlemarch webseries, a 70-episode video-blog, aired on Youtube from March 15th to December 1st, 2017, takes on a particular significance. Firstly because it is an appropration (Sanders) of a nineteenth century novel, from the periphery of academia – the director and actors are a group of Yale students who draw from George Eliot’s Middlemarch (1871-72) moments of emotional and affective tensions or existential questioning which find a direct echo in their personal lives. Secondly this digital collaborative creation disorients (Ahmed) the traditional practice of textual exegesis to serve a queer agenda. Thirdly it exemplifies the process of “computational subjectivation” (Citton). Indeed, in Middlemarch the series, individuation is attained through media ecology, progressively as the characters film themselves, and each other. Finally the series is worth analysing because it replaces representation by “resonance” (Rosa). In doing so, it widens the scope of textual reception and makes of literature a necesseray human experience in the age of crisis.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, Sara. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham, Duke University Press, 2016.
Anger, Suzy. “George Eliot and Philosophy”. The Cambridge Companion to George Eliot (Second Edition), edited by George Levine and Nancy Henry, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 215-235.
Arendt, Hannah. Between Past and Future. Six Exercises in Political Thought. 1954. New York, The Viking Press, 1961.
Bell, Emily. “Adapting Middlemarch in the Information Age”, Interview with Rebecca Shoptaw, Dickens Society Blog, July 4, 2017. https://dickenssociety.org/archives/ 1683. Accessed 30 Mar 2023.
Braidotti, Rosi. “Anthropos Redux. A Defence of Monism in the Anthropocene Epoch”. Frames, vol. 29, no. 2, 2016, pp. 29-46.
Calderón Sandoval, Orianna and Sánchez Espinosa, Adelina. “Feminist Documentary Cinema as a Diffraction Apparatus: A Diffractive Reading of the Spanish Films, Cuidado, resbala and Yes, We Fuck!”. Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 7, 2019, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8070206. Accessed 21 Jun 2023.
Citton, Yves (dir.). L’économie de l’attention: nouvel horizon du capitalisme, Paris, Éditions la Découverte, 2014.
____. “Subjectivations computationnelles à l’erre numérique”. Multitudes, vol. 1, no. 62, 2016, pp. 45-64.
Cohn, Dorrit. Transparent Minds. Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1978.
Deleuze, Gilles. Spinoza. Practical Philosophy. Translated by Robert Hurtley, San Francisco, City Lights Book, 1988.
Duncker, Patricia. Sophie and the Sibyl. A Victorian Romance. London, Bloomsbury, 2015.
Eliot, George. “The Natural History of German Life”. George Eliot. Selected Essays, Poems and Other Writings. 1856. Edited by A.S. Byatt and Nicholas Warren, Harmondsworth, Penguin Classics, 1990, pp. 107-139.
____. Middlemarch. A Study of Provincial Life. 1871-72. Oxford, Oxford World’s Classics, 2019.
Eliot, Thomas Stearns. The Rock. A Pageant Play. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1937.
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality. Volume I: An Introduction. 1976. Translated by Robert Hurley, New York, Vintage Books, 1990.
Han, Byung Chul. In the Swarm. Digital Prospects. Translated by Erik Butler, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press, 2017.
____.Saving Beauty. Translated by Daniel Steuer, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2017. Haraway, Donna. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Nature, New York, Routledge, 1989.
Haraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York, Routledge, 1991.
Haraway, Donna. Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham/London, Duke University Press, 2016.
Head, Simon. “The Grim Threat to British Universities,” New York Review of Books, no. 13, 2011, 58–63.
Husserl, Edmund. Cartesian Mediations. Translated by Dorion Cairns, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.
____. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
James, Henry. “Middlemarch”. The Galaxy, Mar. 1873, pp. 424-428.
Lange, Patricia G. “Vlogging Toward Digital Literacy”. Biography, University of Hawai’i Press, vol. 38, no. 2, 2015, pp. 297-302.
Latour, Bruno. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Translated by. C. Porter, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 2004.
Lefebvre, Henri. The Production of Space. 1974. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith, Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell, 1991.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Phenomenology of Perception. 1945. Translated by Colin Smith, London & New York, Routledge, 2005.
Norberg, Jakob. “Arendt in Crisis: Political Thought in Between Past and Future”. College Literature, vol. 38, no. 1, 2011, pp. 131-149.
Ordine, Nuccio. L’utilità dell’inutile.Manifesto. Con un saggio di Abraham Flexner. Milano, Bompiano, 2013.
Perloff, Marjorie. “Crisis in the Humanities. Reconfiguring Literary Study for the Twenty-first Century”, Differentials: Poetry, Poetics, Pedagogy, Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press, 1994, pp. 1–19.
Pinney, Thomas (ed.). Essays of George Eliot. New York, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.
Preciado, Paul B. Counter-Sexual Manifesto. 2000. Translated by Kevin Gery Dam, foreword by Jack Halberstam, New York, Columbia University Press, 2018.
____. Dysphoria Mundi. Paris, Grasset, 2022.
Rosa, Harmut. Social Acceleration. A New Theory of Modernity. 2005. Translated and introduced by Jonathan Trejo-Mathys, New York, Columbia University Press, 2013.
____. Résonance. Une sociologie de la relation au monde. 2016. Translated by Sacha Zilberfarb and Sarah Raquillet, Paris, Éditions La Découverte, 2018.
Sanders, Julie. Adaptation and Appropriation. London, New York, Routledge, 2016.
Self, Will. “The novel is dead (this time it’s for real)”. The Guardian, 2 May 2014. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/may/02/will-self-novel-dead-literary-fiction. Accessed 21 Jun 2023.
Shoptaw, Rebecca. “Middlemarch, the series”. Youtube, uploaded by Middlemarch: The Series, 2017, https://www.youtube.com/playlist?app=desktop&list=PLR4nSx-CP4IdsPGtXF-JMChQGavHf5zc48. Accessed 29 Mar 2023.
Spinoza, Baruch. Ethics. Preceded by On the Improvement of the Understanding. 1677. Edited and introduced by James Gutmann, New York, Hafner Publishing Company, 1954.
Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality. New York, The Macmillan Company, 1929.
Woolf, Virginia. A Room of One’s Own. 1929. London, The Hogarth Press, 1935.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Theory Now. Journal of Literature, Critique, and Thought is an immediate open-access publication which is available at no cost for readers and authors alike. Authors are not charged any kind of fee for the editorial processing of their articles. Reading, downloading, copying, distributing, printing, searching, linking or reusing all published articles for non-commercial uses is allowed on the condition of citing the author, the journal and the editing body. All intellectual material published in this journal is protected under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Spain license.
Dissemination of the articles in social (Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin, etc.) and scientific networks (ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), public repositories at universities and other institutions, blogs, personal or institutional websites, Google Scholar, ORCID, ResearchID, ScopusID, etc. is strongly encouraged. In all cases, the intellectual property of the articles and any possible monetary profits derived from them belong exclusively to the authors.