Impact of changes in cell multiplication stage during the preparation of sensitizing substance of red cells used in the serological diagnosis of leptospirosis.
Keywords:
Leptospirosis, serological diagnosis, erythrocytes sensitize substanceAbstract
Introduction: In Cuba since 1981 has implemented the indirect hemagglutination as an alternative technique of Leptospirosis diagnosed, in the absence of others that may be more costly but effective at different stages of the disease. For the development of the technique requires the Erythrocytes Sensitize Substance (ESS), assuming the production Finlay Institute in 2009, from obsolete technology in the process of cell multiplication.
Objective: The aim of this study was to make changes at this stage to obtain the ESS with the culture media available at the plant for optimum product performance, without affecting the biological activity as the basic parameter of quality.
Methods: Eight experimental groups were formed according to multifactorial design, taking into account: production strain (LABIOFAM or Finlay strain of L. biflexa Patoc I), culture medium (MK and MEJH) and culture conditions (static or agitated).
Results and conclusion: We obtained as a result that the best variant was the combination (LABIOFAM strain, growth in MEJH and agitated), with a considerable decrease in the time of the ESS obtaining by means of this new technology, with a consistent title with the demands of quality. This work allowed to use the best variant to begin the different designs of stability studies of the product.
Downloads
References
MINSAP. Ministerio de Salud Pública, Cuba. Programa nacional de prevención y control de la leptospirosis humana. Boletin MINSAP Cuba. 1998; 1:45-48.
BES (IPK). Situación de la Leptospirtosis. Boletín Epidemiológico Semanal: Instituto de Medicina Tropical “Pedro Kourí”. 1991; 1(52):3-4.
MINSAP. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Informe del Programa de Zoonosis. La Habana. Boletin MINSAP Cuba. 2008; 4:26-32.
Obtención de inóculo de Leptospira biflexa serovar Patoc I. Instituto Finlay. Procedimiento Normalizado de Operaciones. PNO- N.º 21-275/2010 (4 marzo 2009).
Obtención del antígeno de Leptospira biflexa serovar Patoc I. Instituto Finlay. Procedimiento Normalizado de Operaciones. PNO- N.º 21-276/2010 (25 mayo 2009).
Cespedes M. Leptospirosis: Enfermedad Zoonotica Emergente. Rev Per Med Exp Salud Pública. 2005; 22(4): 125-157.
Requisitos de calidad para pruebas de esterilidad del antígeno de Leptospira biflexa serovar Patoc I. Instituto Finlay. Procedimiento Normalizado de Operaciones. PNO- N.º 20-085/2010 (30 mayo 2010).
Dilución y dispensación del diagnosticador de Leptospira en humanos. Instituto Finlay. Procedimiento Normalizado de Operaciones. PNO-N.º 22-040/2010 (30 mayo 2010).
Etiquetado y envase de bulbos con diagnosticador de Leptospira. Instituto Finlay. Procedimiento Normalizado de Operaciones. PNO-N.º 23-018/2010 (4 junio 2010).
Control de la esterilidad por el método indirecto. Instituto Finlay. Procedimiento Normalizado de Operaciones. PNO-N.º 14-012/2010 (4 junio 2010).
Obregón AM, Martell. M. Diagnóstico serológico de la leptospirosis humana mediante 3 variantes de la técnica de hemoaglutinación pasiva. Rev Cub Med Trop. 1999; 51(1)60-62.
Navarro L, González OL, Sánchez ML, Rodríguez O. Comparación de técnicas para el serodiagnóstico de la leptospirosis humana. Rev Cub Invest Bioméd. 2004; 23 Suppl 1:1-15.
Obregón AM, Fernández C, Rodríguez I, Rodríguez J, Zamora Y. Avances de laboratorio en el diagnóstico serológico y la investigación de la leptospirosis humana en Cuba. Rev Cub Med Trop. 2007; 59(1):11-14.
Louvel H, Picardeau M. Genetic manipulation of Leptospira biflexa. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2007; 12:25-32.
Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA. Leptospira and leptonema. Pfaller MA. In: et al, eds. Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th edn. Washington DC: ASM Press; 2003.p.929-936.
Perni S, Andrew PW, Shama G. Estimating the maximum growth rate from microbial growth curves: definition is everything. Food Microbiol. 2005; 22:491-495.
Adler B, de la Peña M. Leptospira and Leptospirosis. Vet Microbiol. 2009; 30:1010-1016.
Ellinghausen HC, McCullough WG. Nutrition of Leptospira pomona and growth of 13 other serotypes: fractionation of oleic albumin complex and a medium of bovine albumin and polysorbate 80. Am J Vet Res. 1965; 26:45-51.
Ristow P, Bourhy P, Kerneis S, et al. Biofilm formation by saprophytic and pathogenic leptospires. Microbiol. 2008; 154:1309-1317.
Bourhy P, Frangeul L, Couve E, Glaser P, Saint Girons I. Complete nucleotide sequence of the LE1 prophage from the spirochete Leptospira biflexa and characterization of Its replication and partition functions. J Bacteriol. 2005; 187:3931-3940.
Picardeau M, Bulach DM, Bouchier C, et al. Genome sequence of the saprophyte Leptospira biflexa provides insights into the evolution of Leptospira and the pathogenesis of leptospirosis. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(2):1607-1616.
Louvel H, Bommezzadri S, Zidane N, et al. Comparative and Functional Genomic Analyses of Iron Transport and Regulation in Leptospira spp. J Bacteriol. 2006; 188(22):7893-7904.
Sritharan M, Asuthkar S. Iron regulated proteins (IRPs) of Leptospira biflexa serovar Patoc, strain Patoc I. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2004; 22(2):92-96.
Louvel H, Betton JM, Picardeau M. Heme rescues a two-component system Leptospira biflexa mutant. BMC Microbiol. 2008; 8:2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The articles, which are published in this journal, are subject to the following terms in relation to the rights of patrimonial or exploitation:
- The authors will keep their copyright and guarantee to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be distributed with a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 license that allows third parties to reuse the work whenever its author, quote the original source and do not make commercial use of it.
b. The authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the original source of its publication is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and advised to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).