Departamentos de práctica farmacéutica en el mundo, en 2006

Authors

  • Fernando Fernández-Llimós
  • Fernando Martínez-Martínez
  • Miguel Ángel Gastelurrutia

Keywords:

Administrative Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Social Pharmacy, University

Abstract

Aims: A Web based research was desgined in 2006 to search for Pharmacy Practice, Social and Administrative Pharmacy departements in all Pharmacy Schools in the world.

Material and Methods: The International Federation Pharmacy list of all Faculty of Pharmacy in the world was used. The key words used were: Pharmacy Practice, Social Pharmacy and Administrative Pharmacy in different languages: English, Spanish and Portuguese.

Results: 718 Faculties of Pharmacy were identified, 192 reaching the inclusion criteria. 83 out of them had a PPD with a key word in their web site. In Oceania there were 9 PPD, in Asia 8 and in Europe 22. In America 43, all of them located in North America while in Africa there was only one university with a PPD.

Conclusions: The biggest rate of implementation of PPD happens in well developed countries. They are autonomous, independent from other departments and with a multidisciplinary structure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tromp Fj Th. Informe del Grupo de Trabajo para implementar la Atención farmacéutica en el currículum. Pharm Care Esp. 1999; 1: 270-27

Canaday RB, Taking the fork in the road… and changing the World. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2006; 46(5): 546-548

Cipolle, R.J. Strand, L.M. Morley, P.C. Pharmaceutical Care Practice. McGraw-Hill Companies.1998

World Health Organization. Report of a WHO consultative group: the role of the pharmacist in the health care system. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1994. Rep. no. WHO/PHARM/94.569

World Health Organization. Report of a third WHO consultative group on the role of the pharmacist. The role of the pharmacist in the health care system. Preparing the pharmacist: future curricular development. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1991. Rep. no. WHO/1211/27

Wiedenmayer K, Summers RS, Mackie CA, Vous AGS, Everard M. Developing pharmacy practice. A focus on patient care. Pag. 16 Ed. WHO – FIP. Geneve. 2006

Foro de Atención Farmacéutica en Farmacia Comunitaria. La Misión del farmacéutico. “Dispensar y seguir al paciente”. AULA de la Farmacia. 2009; Noviembre: 61-62

http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/educ/bologna/bologna.pdf (acceso septiembre 2006)

Aneca: Titulo de grado en Farmacia – Madrid octubre 2005

Sokar-Tod HB, Einarson TR. Community pharmacy practice research: a systematic review of the past 32 years. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2003; 136(8): 26-38

Grupo de Expertos. Consenso sobre Atención Farmacéutica. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo; 2001.

Foro de Atención Farmacéutica, panel de expertos. Documento de Consenso, Enero de 2008. Ed. Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales de Farmacéuticos, Madrid. ISBN 978-84-691-1243-4.

van Mil F. Pharmacy, world and science?. Editorial. Pharm World Sci. 2003; 25(4): 127

Gastelurrutia MA. Investigación en farmacia comunitaria [editorial]. Farmacéuticos Comunitarios. 2010; 2(1): 3

Gastelurrutia MA, Fernández-Llimós F, García-Delgado P, Gastelurrutia P, Faus MJ, Benrimoj SI. Barreras y facilitadores para la diseminación e implantación de servicios cognitivos de la farmacia comunitaria española. Seguim Farmacoter. 2005; 3(2): 65-77

Mariño EL. El Documento de Bolonia y la formación universitaria europea del futuro farmacéutico. Atenicón Farmacéutica. 2005; 7(4): 309-13

Anónimo. La atención farmacéutica en la universidad. Panorama Actual Med. 2013; 37(369):1238-1241

International Pharmaceutical Federation, https://213.206.88.26 /www2/education/index.php?page=pharmacy_education&pharmacy_education=edu_schools. (acceso 2 de junio de 2006)

http://academic_institutional_membership.fip.org/world-list-of-pharmacy-schools/ (acceso noviembre 2014)

Gastelurrutia MA, Benrimoj SI, Castrillón CC, Casado de Amezua MJ, Fernández-Llimós F, Faus MJ. Facilitators for practice change in Spanish Community Pharmacy. Pharm World Sci. 2009; 31: 32-39

http://www.giaf-ugr.org/ (acceso septiembre 2006)

http://www.farmacia.ub.edu/recursos/webs.htm (acceso septiembre 2006)

Fernandez-Llimos F, Tuneu L, Baena MI, Garcia-Delgado A, Faus MJ. Morbidity and Mortality Associated with Pharmacotherapy. Evolution and Current Concept of Drug-Related Problems. Curr Pharm Design. 2004; 10: 3947-3967.

Fernandez-Llimos F, Faus MJ, Gastelurrutia MA, Baena MI, Martínez Martínez F. Evolución del concepto de problemas relacionados con medicamentos resultados como el centro del nuevo paradigma. Seguim Farmacoter. 2005; 3(4): 167-188.

Fernandez-Llimos F, Faus MJ. From “drug-related problems” to “negative clinical outcomes”. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2005; 62(22): 2348-50

http://www.ub.es/farcli/indice.htm (acceso septiembre 2006)

Published

2015-03-20

How to Cite

1.
Fernández-Llimós F, Martínez-Martínez F, Gastelurrutia M Ángel. Departamentos de práctica farmacéutica en el mundo, en 2006. Ars Pharm [Internet]. 2015 Mar. 20 [cited 2024 Jul. 22];56(1):8-16. Available from: https://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/ars/article/view/4258

Issue

Section

Original Articles