“Exiled from all Gregarity”: Profane Love, Poetics and Political Imagination in Barthes and Agamben
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.30827/tnj.v2i1.8522Mots-clés :
Love, Literary theory, Agamben, Barthes, Imagination, Post-secular, Homo-Sacer, Poetry.Résumé
This article offers the literary and philosophical concept of “profane love”, following the juxtaposition of Giorgio Agamben’s concept of singular love and his political and poetic project of profanation, with the figurative and scattered notions of love found in Roland Barthes A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments. The article opens with a critique of the discursive state of love today and its relation to politics and power. Following Barthes idea of an obscene and Agamben’s notions of profanation and exposure, the article argues that love should be thought of as an experience in passivity that happens in the encounter and touch of two separate singularities. This process, the article argues, involves the imagination, and as such is thought of with regard to political and poetic imagination. The article thus thinks of Agamben’s notoriously pessimistic figure of the Homo-Sacer – the abandoned man – in a new light. It argues that the lover, as a participant in a radical experience of passivity and exposure, can also be thought of as abandoned, offering an affirmative perspective on Agamben’s political thought.Téléchargements
Références
Agamben, Giorgio. The Coming Community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.
_______. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1998.
_______. The Idea of Prose. Albany: State University of New York, 1985.
_______. Nymphs. London: Seagull, 2013.
_______. Nudities. Stanford: Stanford California Press, 2011.
_______.The Open: Man and Animal. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2004.
_______. Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Stanford, Cal: Stanford University Press, 1999.
_______. Profanations. New York: Zone Books, 2015.
_______. Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. New York: Zone Books, 1999a.
_______. The Adventure. Cambridge, Massachusetts : The MIT Press, 2018.
_______. The Church and the Kingdom. London: Seagull, 2012.
_______. The End of the Poem: Studies in Poetics. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1999.
_______. The Fire and the Tale. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2017.
_______. The Idea of Prose. N.Y: State University of New York press, 1995.
_______. The Man Without Content. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2008.
_______. The Use of Bodies. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2015a.
Ahmed, Sara. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014.
Alter, Robert. “The Garden of Metaphor”. The Art of Biblical Poetry, New York: Basic Books, 2011, pp. 185-203.
Badiou, Alain, Nicolas Truong, and Peter R. Bush. In Praise of Love. New York: New Press, 2012.
Barthes, Roland. A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments. London: Penguin Books, 1977.
Belsey, Catherine. Desire: Love Stories in Western Culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
Cadava, Eduardo and Cortes-Rocca, Paola. “Notes on Love and Photography”. October, vol. 116, Spring 2006, 3-34.
Graeber, David and Wengrow, David. “How to Change the Course of Human History”. https://www.eurozine.com/change-course-human-history/
Heath, Stephan. “Barthes on Love”. SubStance, Vol. 11/12, Vol. 11, no. 4 - Vol. 12, no. 1, Issue 37-38, 1982/1983, 100-106.
Illouz, Eva. Cold intimacies the making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge: Polity 2017.
______. Why love hurts: a sociological explanation. Cambridge: Polity, 2015.
Jacobson, Roman (1960), “Closing Statements: Linguistics and Poetics". Style In Language, edited by Thomas A. Sebeok, Cambridge Massachusetts, MIT Press, 1960, pp. 350–377.
Nancy, Jean-Luc, and Peter Connor. The Inoperative Community. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.
Parsley, Connal. “'a Particular Fetishism': Love, Law and the Image in Agamben”. Giorgio Agamben: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Frost, Tom, New-York: Routledge, 2013, pp. 31-53.
Plato. The Symposioum. Project Gutenberg, internet source, http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1600/1600-h/1600-h.htm.
Prozorov, Sergei. Agamben and Politics: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press, 2014.
Solomon, Robert C. “A Lover’s Reply (To Roland Barthes’ A Lover’s Discourse)”. Philosophy and Desire, edited by Silverman, Hugh J., New York: Routledge, 2000, pp. 143-158.
Unger, Steven. “The Professor of Desire”. Yale French Studies, No. 63, 1982, 80-97.
Zamir, Tzachi. Double Vision: Moral Philosophy and Shakespearean Drama. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
Whyte, Jessica S. Catastrophe and Redemption: The Political Thought of Giorgio Agamben. Albany: SUNY Press, 2013.
Wolfreys, Julian. “Face to Face with Agamben; or, the Other in Love”. The Work of Giorgio Agamben: Law, Literature, Life, edited by Justin Clemens, Nicholas Heron and Alex Murray, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008, pp. 149-163.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Theory Now Journal of Literature, Critique, and Thought est une publication d’accès ouvert, immédiat et totalement gratuit pour les lecteurs autant que les auteurs. Les auteurs ne payent aucun frais pour le processus éditorial de leurs articles. Nous permettons la lecture, le téléchargement, la copie, la distribution, l’impression, la recherche, le lien ou la réutilisation de tous les travaux publiés à des fins non commerciales, à condition que l’auteur, la revue et l’entité éditoriale soient cités. La diffusion des articles dans les réseaux sociaux (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc.) et scientifiques (ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), les dépôts institutionnels universitaires et autres dépôts publics, blogs et web personnels ou institutionnels, Google Scholar, ORCID, ResearchID, ScopusID, etc., est vivement recommandée. Dans tous les cas, la propriété intellectuelle des articles et les possibles droits économiques dérivés d’eux sont conservés exclusivement par leurs auteurs.