Three Rival Versions of Theological Genealogy: Catholicism, Left Hegelianism and Post-Secularism
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.30827/tnj.v3i2.15254Mots-clés :
Charles Taylor, Left-Hegelianism, Jürgen Habermas, Post-Secularism, Secularism.Résumé
In this paper I would like to discuss three rival versions of theological genealogy that are popular today. In doing so I seek to offer a few examples of how the most recent scholarly turn to theology is ultimately being driven by disparate political ideologies. The first one I describe as new Catholic modernity critiques, which often emphasize the breakdown of moral consensus brought on by Protestantism, theological nominalism, etc. The second are proponents of what I describe as a Left Hegelian project of detheologization—scholars on the political Left who in recognizing the theological origins of modernity seek to overcome theology in order to advance a progress project (Roberto Unger and Samuel Moyn). Finally, I will discuss the so-called post-secularists (Jürgen Habermas, Hans Joas, Charles Taylor) who see modernity neither as morally incoherent, nor theology as a bad thing; rather, these scholars argue that secularism and “the Judeo-Christian tradition” developed together and therefore can mutually enrich each other.
Téléchargements
Références
Balibar, Étienne. Secularism and Cosmopolitanism. Critical Hypotheses on Religion and Politics. New York, Columbia University Press, 2020.
Berlinerblau, Jacques. “The Crisis in Secular Studies”. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 8 September 2014, https://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Crisis-in-Secular-Studies/148599. Accessed 15 January 2020.
Gordon, “Has Modernity Failed?”, The Immanent Frame, 12 September 2013, https://tif.ssrc.org/2013/09/12/has-modernity-failed/. Accessed 17 January 2020.
Gregory, Brad S. The Unintended Reformation. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2012.
Habermas, Jürgen and Joseph Ratzinger. The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion, translated by Brian McNeil, C.R.V. San Francisco, Ignatius Press, 2007.
Joas, Hans. Faith as an Option, translated by Alex Skinner. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2014.
Laborde, Cécile. “Liberalism’s Religion: Response to Winnifred Fallers Sullivan”, Syndicate, 5 November 2019, https://syndicate.network/symposia/theology/liberalisms-religion/. Accessed 24 April 2019.
Moyn, Samuel. Christian Human Rights. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.
Pfau, Thomas. Minding the Modern. Notre Dame, The University of Notre Dame Press, 2015.
Rose, Matthew. “Tayloring Christianity Charles Taylor is a theologian of the secular status quo”. First Things, December 2014, https://www.firstthings.com/article/2014/12/tayloring-christianity. Accessed 20 January 2020.
Social Science Research Council. The Immanent Frame, 2008-2020, https://tif.ssrc.org/. Accessed 15 January 2020.
Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2007.
Unger, Roberto. The Religion of the Future. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2014.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Theory Now Journal of Literature, Critique, and Thought est une publication d’accès ouvert, immédiat et totalement gratuit pour les lecteurs autant que les auteurs. Les auteurs ne payent aucun frais pour le processus éditorial de leurs articles. Nous permettons la lecture, le téléchargement, la copie, la distribution, l’impression, la recherche, le lien ou la réutilisation de tous les travaux publiés à des fins non commerciales, à condition que l’auteur, la revue et l’entité éditoriale soient cités. La diffusion des articles dans les réseaux sociaux (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc.) et scientifiques (ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), les dépôts institutionnels universitaires et autres dépôts publics, blogs et web personnels ou institutionnels, Google Scholar, ORCID, ResearchID, ScopusID, etc., est vivement recommandée. Dans tous les cas, la propriété intellectuelle des articles et les possibles droits économiques dérivés d’eux sont conservés exclusivement par leurs auteurs.