(Comparative) Theory of Literature: Against the World Literature of Time Without History

Authors

  • Àlex Matas Pons Universitat de Barcelona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/tn.v6i1.26175

Keywords:

Comparative Literature, Theory of Literature, World Literature, Franco Moretti, Roland Barthes, Jacques Rancière, Michel Foucault

Abstract

World literature has become the favourite object of study of Comparative Literature, which has been forced to revise some of its classical methodological assumptions in the face of the unprecedented modalities of the production and circulation of texts in the new global space. The article reviews how the assumption by the best-known theorists of world literature of the practices and tools of the social sciences has favoured the revitalisation of those historicist modalities of nineteenth-century comparatism that the various crises of comparative literature seemed to have dismissed from persuasive textualist arguments. In particular, it deals with Franco Moretti's analogy between literary comparatism and historical science. Against his arguments for the sociologisation of literary studies, this article not only suggests the appropriateness of taking up the pro-textualist arguments of earlier debates about comparatism, but argues, from a reading of the work of Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault and Jacques Rancière, that it is in the historiographical operation and philosophy of history that comparatism can find its best tools for critical reading in the new global regime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apter, Emily. Against World Literature. On the Politics of Untranslatability. Londres, Verso, 2013.

_____. “On Translation in a Global Market”. Public Culture, vol. 13, no. 1, 2001, pp. 1-12.

_____. “Untranslatables: A World System”. New Literary History, vol. 39, no. 3, 2008, pp. 581-598.

Balibar, Étienne. Cosmopolitique. Des frontières à l’espèce humaine. Ecrits III. Paris, La Découverte, 2022.

Barthes, Roland, “El discurso de la historia”. El susurro del lenguaje, Barcelona, Paidós, 1999, pp. 163-177.

_____. El grado cero de la escritura. Madrid, Siglo XXI, 1999.

Beecroft, Alexander. “La negociación de la literatura mundial”. New Left Review, no. 54, 2009, pp. 85-96.

Bernheimer, Charles. “The Bernheimer Report, 1993”. Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism, Charles Bernheim (ed.), Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1995, pp. 39-48

Casanova, Pascale. La república mundial de las letras. Barcelona, Anagrama, 1999.

Damrosch, David. What is World Literature? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.

David, Jerôme. “Proposition pour une macrohistoire de la littérature mondiale”. Où est la littérature mondiale?, Christophe Pradeau y Samoyaut, Tiphaine (eds.), París, Presses Universitaires de Vincennes, 2005, pp. 115-138.

De Certeau, Michel. “El lugar del muerto y el lugar del lector”. La escritura de la historia, Mexico, Universidad Iberoamericana, 2006, pp. 116-118.

Fornari, Emanuela. Líneas de frontera. Filosofía y postcolonialismo. Barcelona, Gedisa, 2017.

Foucault, Michel. La arqueología del saber. Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI, 1999.

Ginzburg, Carlo. El queso y los gusanos. El cosmos según un molinero del siglo XVI. 1976. Barcelona, Península, 1999.

Harootunian, Harry. “Some Thoughts on Comparability and the Space-Time Problem”. Boundary 2, vol. 32, no. 2, 2005, pp. 23-52.

_____. Marx after Marx. History and Time in the Expansion of Capitalism. New York, Columbia UP, 2015.

Hartog, François. Confrontations avec l’histoire. Paris, Gallimard, 2021.

Mezzadra, Sandro y Neilson, Brett. La frontera como método. Madrid, Traficantes de sueños, 2017.

Moretti, Franco. “Conjeturas sobre literatura mundial”. New Left Review, no. 3, 2000, pp. 65-76.

_____. “Más conjeturas sobre literatura mundial”. New Left Review, no. 20, 2003, pp. 83-92.

_____. La literatura vista desde lejos. Barcelona, Marbot, 2007.

_____. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. London, Verso, 2015.

_____. “Los caminos que llevan a Roma: Estudios literarios, hermenèutica, cuantificación”. New Left Review, no. 20, 2020, pp. 135-147.

Moretti, Franco y Sobchuk, Oleg. “Oculto a pleno vista”. New Left Review, no. 118, 2019, pp. 97-130.

Prendergast, Christopher. “La negociación de la literatura mundial”. New Left Review, no. 8, 2001, pp. 77-96.

Rancière, Jacques. Les Noms de l’Histoire. Essai de poétique du savoir. Paris, Seuil, 1992.

_____. El hilo perdido. Madrid, Casus Belli, 2015.

Ricoeur, Paul. La memòria, la historia, el olvido. Madrid, Trotta, 2010.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, Muerte de una disciplina. Santiago de Chile, Palinodia, 2009.

Wellek, René. “La crisis de la literatura comparada”. Literatura comparada: principios y métodos, María José Vega y Neus Carbonell (eds.), Madrid, Gredos, 1999, pp. 79-88.

Published

2023-01-28

How to Cite

Matas Pons, Àlex. (2023). (Comparative) Theory of Literature: Against the World Literature of Time Without History. Theory Now. Journal of Literature, Critique, and Thought, 6(1), 128–153. https://doi.org/10.30827/tn.v6i1.26175

Issue

Section

Miscellanea