The Link Between Foucault's Writing and the Ontology of Ourselves

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/tn.v6i1.21841

Keywords:

Writing, Foucault, Modern Ethos, Language, Experience, Practice of Self

Abstract

The objective of this article is to show the possibility of linking writing with the ontology of ourselves. This article is divided into two sections, one that analyzes the objective part of the circulation of writing and the other that analyzes the subjective part of writing. In the first part, the way in which Foucault considers books and the objective circulation of writing, in their material effects, will be shown in four different ways: as a toolbox, as a weapon, as an experience and as an event. In the second part, the subjective part of writing is analyzed, which refers to the writer subject. The texts A danger that seduces and “The writing of oneself” will be analyzed to address writing from subjectivity. This article will show that the assembly between the objective and subjective part of writing can be done through the modern ethos, and that it is consistent
with the proposal of the Foucaultian ontology of ourselves.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buron, Pablo Frau. “Michel Foucault: el ejercicio de escritura como praxis de transformación de sí”. Pensamiento, vol. 76, no. 290, 2020, pp. 697-706.

Foucault, Michel. “¿Qué es un autor?”. Entre filosofía y literatura. Buenos Aires, Paidós, 1999, pp. 329-360.

____. “Diálogo sobre el poder”. Estética, ética y hermenéutica. Buenos Aires, Paidós,1999, pp. 59-72.

____. “La escritura de sí”. Estética, ética y hermenéutica. Buenos Aires, Paidós, 1999, pp. 289-306.

____. “¿Qué es la Ilustración?”. Estética, ética y hermenéutica. Buenos Aires, Paidós, 1999, pp. 335-352.

____. El orden del discurso. Buenos Aires, Tusquets, 2005.

____. “Gestionar los ilegalismos”. Entrevistas con Foucault, Roger-Paul Droit, Buenos Aires, Paidós, 2008, pp. 45-58.

____. “Soy un artificiero”. Entrevistas con Foucault, Roger-Paul Droit, Buenos Aires, Paidós, 2008, pp. 71-104.

____. Historia de la locura en la época clásica I. Buenos Aires, FCE, 2009.

____. “El libro como experiencia”. La inquietud por la verdad. Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI, 2013, pp. 33-100.

____. “Acerca de la genealogía de la ética”. La inquietud por la verdad. Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI, 2013, pp. 123-158.

____. Un peligro que seduce. Madrid, Cuatro, 2012.

Galichon, Isabelle. “L’éthopoïétique de l’écriture de soi”. Phantasia, no. 8, 2019, pp. 21-30.

Lorenzini, Daniele. “Expériences de l’écriture chez Michel Foucault”. Les intermittences du sujet, Sylvie Jouanny et Élisabeth Le Corre (dirs.), Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2016, pp. 41-49.

Pereyra, Ignacio. “¿Se puede considerar la experiencia literaria dentro de una ontología de nosotros mismos?”. Revista Hybris, vol. 12, no. 1, 2021, pp. 113-138.

Salas, Marina. “La práctica de la escritura en Foucault: literatura, locura, muerte y escritura de sí”. Dorsal, no. 2, 2017, pp. 219-244.

Published

2023-01-28

How to Cite

Pereyra, I. J. (2023). The Link Between Foucault’s Writing and the Ontology of Ourselves. Theory Now. Journal of Literature, Critique, and Thought, 6(1), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.30827/tn.v6i1.21841

Issue

Section

Miscellanea