<em>Carmina non prius audita</em>: estructuras de argumentación y lenguaje poético en las odas de Horacio

George Bogdan Cristea

doi:10.30827/floril.v34.28932

Authors

George Bogdan Cristea University of Cambridge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/floril.v34.28932

Keywords:

Horace, odes, argumentation, logic, stylistics, metre

Abstract

The article concentrates upon the relationship between logic and poetry in Horace's odes from the point of view of language and argumentation. At a first level, I examine the extent to which the poet’s linguistic and argumentative techniques agree with the classical structures and strategies of argumentation, but, at a deeper level of analysis, the article aims to show how logic and philosophy intertwine with poetry through stylistics and metre. The study identifies three principal types of argumentative discourse that can be found in the Horatian odes: the demonstration, with its strong (induction) and weak (petitio principii, hasty generalisation) forms, the exhortation, which may be either based upon analogy or accompanied by short explanations, and the contrasting of arguments.

Downloads

Captures
Mendeley - Readers: 1

References

ADAMS, James Noel (1971), «A Type of Hyperbaton in Latin Prose», Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 197: 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1750270500012781

[AUCTORES RHETORICI] Rutilius Lupus, Aquila Romanus, Iulius Rufinianus (1599), De figuris sententiarum et elocutionis. Paris, Ex officina Plantiniana.

CRISTEA, George Bogdan (2022), «Satiris musaque pedestri. Philosophie et causerie à travers la poésie dans les Sermones d’Horace», Latomus 81: 320-351.

DANGEL, Jacqueline (1982), La phrase oratoire chez Tite-Live. Paris, Les Belles Lettres. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/igram.1981.2417

D’ANGOUR, Armand (2003), «Drowning by Numbers : Pythagoreanism and Poetry in Horace Odes 1.28», Greece and Rome 50: 206-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gr/50.2.206

FISKE, George Converse (1966), Lucilius and Horace: A Study in the Classical Theory of Imitation. Hildesheim, Georg Olms.

LAURAND, Louis (19654), Études sur le style des discours de Cicéron. Avec une esquisse de l’histoire du « cursus ». Amsterdam, Adolf M. Hakkert.

LAUSBERG, Heinrich (1998), Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. Leiden – Boston – Köln, Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004663213

LO CASCIO, Vincenzo (1991), Grammatica dell’argomentare. Strategie e strutture. Firenze, La Nuova Italia.

MAROUZEAU, Jules (1922), L’ordre des mots dans la phrase latine. I. Les groupes nominaux. Paris, E. Champion.

NISBET, Robin George Murdoch (1999), «Word Order in Horace’s Odes», in James Noel Adams & Roland Mayer (eds.), Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. London, Oxford University Press: 135-154.

NISBET, Robin George Murdoch & HUBBARD, Margaret (1970), A Commentary on Horace: Odes, Book 1. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

NISBET, Robin George Murdoch & HUBBARD, Margaret (1978), A Commentary on Horace: Odes, Book 1I. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

NISBET, Robin George Murdoch & RUDD, Niall (2004), A Commentary on Horace: Odes, Book III. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

NOUGARET, Louis (1963), Traité de métrique latine classique. Paris, Klincksieck.

PERELMAN, Chaïm & OLBRECHTS-TYTÉCA, Lucie (1958), Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France [réimpr. Bruxelles, 2008].

PINKSTER, Harm (2021), The Oxford Latin Syntax. Volume II. The Complex Sentence and Discourse. Oxford, University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199230563.001.0001

POWELL, Jonathan (2013), «Cicero’s Style», in Catherine Steel (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge, University Press: 41-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139048750.005

REBOUL, Olivier (1991), Introduction à la rhétorique. Théorie et pratique. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.

ROMANO, Eliza (1991), Q. Orazio Flacco. Le opere. I. Le odi. Il carme secolare. Gli epodi, tomo secondo. Roma, Libreria dello Stato.

TINDALE, Christopher William (2007), Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. Cambridge, University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806544

TOMA, Alice (2011), «La relation textuelle d’exemplification et l’exemple mathématique», en Victor Ferry, Benoît Sans, Alice Toma (eds.), Études sur l’exemple. Bucarest, Éditions du Musée de la Littérature Roumaine: 49-82.

TOULMIN, Stephen Edelston (1958), The Uses of Argument. Cambridge, University Press. [repr. 2012].

VILLENEUVE, François (1927), Horace. Tome I. Odes et épodes. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.

WALTON, Douglas, REED, Chris & MACAGNO, Fabrizio (2008), Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge, University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034

WEST, David (2002), Horace, Odes III, Dulce Periculum: Text, Translation and Commentary. Oxford, University Press.

WILKINSON, Lancelot Patrick (1963), Golden Latin Artistry. Cambridge, University Press.

WOODMAN, Anthony John (2022), Horace: Odes, Book III. Cambridge, University Press.

WOOLF, Raphael (2009), «Pleasure and Desire», in James Warren (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge, University Press: 158-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521873475.010

ZIMMERMANN, Philippe (2009), Rythme métrique et rythme rhétorique dans la poésie lyrique d’Horace : recherche sur une poétique du sens (thèse de doctorat). Université Rennes 2.