Fritz Heider, a Psicologia do Senso Comum e a atribuição de Causalidade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/dreh.vi21.26230Palavras-chave:
Fritz Heider; Psicologia do senso comum; atribuição causal; percepção social; teorias da atribuiçãoResumo
No seu tempo, Fritz Heider construiu uma proposta teórica importante para vencer alguns dos limites da abordagem psicométrica, a qual teve grande impacto na reorganização dos estudos em Psicologia Social. Passados estes anos, pretende-se recuperar uma parte das reflexões originais do autor, com o objectivo de valorizar a dimensão subjectiva nos estudos sobre a percepção social da realidade e de recuperar a concepção do sujeito como um todo (uno e complexo, na senda da herança legada pela teoria da gestalt), contribuindo assim para a revitalização da perspectiva fenomenológica contemporânea no estudo do comportamento humano.
Downloads
Referências
Abramson, L.; Seligman, M.; Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49-74.
Araújo, S. (2009). Uma visão panorâmica da psicologia científica de Wilhelm Wundt. Scientiae Studia, 7(2), 209-220.
Bohm, G.; Pfister, H.-R. (2015). How people explain their own and others’ behavior: A theory of lay causal explanations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 139, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00139
Carless, S.; Waterworth, R. (2012). The importance of ability and effort in recruiters’ hirability decisions: An empirical examination of attribution theory. Australian Psychologist, 47, 232-237.
Carson, J.; Waddingham, J.; Mackey, J. (2020). Organization member action proximity and attributions for managerial crisis response failure. Management Decision, 58(10), 2177-2193.
Crespo, E.; Freire, J. (2014). La atribución de responsabilidad: De la cognición al sujeto. Psicología & Sociedade, 26, 271-279.
Eiser, J. (1983). Attribution theory and social cognition. In J. Jaspars, F. Fincham, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, developmental and social dimensions (pp. 91-113). London (UK): Academic Press.
Garcia-Marques, L. (1991). Heider: O protótipo das origens do estudo da atribuição. Psicologia, 8(1), 161-165.
Harvey, J.; Weary, G.; Stanley, M. (1985). Introduction: Attribution theory and research, In Harvey, J.; Weary, G. (Eds.), Attribution: Basic issues and applications (pp.1-4). Orlando, Florida (USA): Academic Press.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York (USA): J. Wiley & Sons.
Heider, F. (1959). On Lewin’s method and theory. Journal of Social Issues, 15(S13), 3-13.
Heider, F. (1978a). Social perception and phenomenal causality. In Tagiuri, R.; Petrullo, L. (Ed.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 1-21). Stanford (USA): Stanford University Press.
Heider, F. (1978b). Perceiving the other person. In Tagiuri, R.; Petrullo, L. (Ed.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 22-26). Stanford (USA): Stanford University Press.
Heider, F. (1978c). Consciousness, the perceptual world and communications with others. In Tagiuri, R.; Petrullo, L. (Ed.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 27-32). Stanford (USA): Stanford University Press.
Hewstone, M. (1983). Attribution theory and common sense explanations. In Hewstone, M. (Ed.), Attribution theory. Social and functional extensions (pp.1-26). Oxford (UK): Basil Blackwell.
Jones, E.; Davis, K. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 219-266). New York (USA): Academic Press.
Kelley, H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192-238). Lincolm (USA): University Nebraska Press.
Kelley, H.; Michela, J. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457-501.
Kidd, R.; Amabile, T. (1981). Causal explanation in social interaction: Some dialogues on dialogue. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (pp.307-328). Hillsdale, Michigan (USA): Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kruglanski, A. (1980). Lay epistemologic process and contents: Another look at attribution theory. Psychological Review, 87, 70-87.
Langer, E. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. In Harvey, J.; Ickes, W.; Kidd, R. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (pp.35-58). Hillsdale, Michigan (USA): Lawrence Erlbaum.
Levy, S.; Chiu, C.; Hong, Y. (2006). Lay theories and intergroup relations. Group Process. Intergroup Relations, 9, 5–24.
MacLeod, R. (1978). The phenomenological approach to social psychology. In Tagiuri, R.; Petrullo, L. (Ed.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 33-53). Stanford (USA): Stanford University Press.
Malle, B. (2008). Fritz Heider’s legacy. Celebrated insights, many of then misunderstood. Social Psychology, 39(3), 163-173.
Marques, J.; Sousa, E. (1982). A teoria da atribuição: Para uma análise do senso-comum. Psicologia, 3(2), 119-144.
Martinko, M.; Mackey, J. (2019). Attribution theory: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(5), 523-527.
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252-283.
Park, J.; Choi, I.; Cho, G. (2006). The actor-observer bias in beliefs of interpersonal insights. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(6), 630-642.
Pervin, L. (1984). Idiographic approaches to personality. In Endler, N.; Hunt, J. (Eds.), Personality and the behavioral disorders (pp. 261-282). New York (USA): J. Wiley & Sons.
Quirino, T. (2012). Vertentes da psicologia social moderna: Mead e Heider. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 5(2), 159-176.
Reich, R. (2006). Self-doubt, attribution, and the perceived implicit theories of others. Self and Identity, 5, 89-109.
Reisenzein, R.; Rudolph, U. (2008). The discovery of common-sense psychology. Social Psychology, 39(3), 125-133.
Ross, L. (1981). The 'intuitive scientist' formulation and its developmental implications. In Flavell, J.; Ross, L. (Eds.), Cognitive development. Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 1-42). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Rotter, J. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (USA): Prentice Hall.
Sanders, K.; Yang, H.; Patel, C. (Eds.) (2021). Handbook on HR process research. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar.
Snyder, M.; Stephan, W.; Rosenfield, D. (1978). Attributional egotism. In Harvey, J.; Ickes, W.; Kidd, R. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (pp.91-117). Hillsdale, Michigan (USA): Lawrence Erlbaum.
Suárez, E. (1982). Los processos de atribución causal. Estudios de Psicologia, 12, 34-45.
Vala, J. (1991). O que há de novo num texto velho - a propósito do artigo de Heider: Social perception and phenomenal causality (1944). Psicologia, 8(1), 157-159.
Van Rossenberg, Y. (2021). Perceptions of HRM: When do we differ in perceptions? When is it meaningful to assess such differences? In Sanders, K.; Yang, H.; Patel, C. (Eds.), Handbook on HR process research (pp.46-68). Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar.
Weary, G.; Rich, M.; Harvey, J.; Ickes, W. (1980). Heider's formulation of social perception and attributional processes: Toward further clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 37-43.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York (USA): Springer-Verlag.
Weiner, B. (2018a). The legacy of an attribution approach to motivation and emotion: A no-crisis zone. Motivation Science, 4(1), 4–14.
Weiner, B. (2018b). The contributions of an attribution approach to emotion and motivation. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 49(1), 3-10.
