Significance and framing of the gender factor in the reproduction of intimate partner violence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/dreh.v0i1.7176Palabras clave:
género, cultura, violência íntima, controlo coercitivoResumen
No presente trabalho defende-se que, apesar de grande parte da violência entre parceiros íntimos ter origem em fatores endémicos – inerentes às elevadas expectativas em que está sustentada a comunicação na intimidade –, ela não pode ser adequadamente compreendida cindida do entorno sociocultural, no qual a normatividade de género assume grande relevância. A intimidade é caracterizada por uma dependência paradoxal relativamente aos processos comunicativos exteriores onde tomam parte os seus "membros", sendo que no que concerne aos padrões de género, ela não é somente reprodutora das assimetrias simbólicas, mas é também, e sobretudo, recetáculo da sua crescente fluidez. Sendo certo que as atribuições de género se tendem a concretizar por negociação interativa, na intimidade subsistem certas determinações tradicionais. Neste ponto, as conceções de amor romântico assumem um papel preponderante, propiciando diferenciais de poder e distribuição de recursos, mas camuflando também práticas de abuso que têm o seu extremo no recurso à violência.
Descargas
Citas
Aboim, S. (2010). Plural Masculinities. The Remaking of the Self in Private Life. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
Bell, D.; Binnie, J. (2000). The Sexual Citizen: Queer Politics and Beyond, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bograd, M. (1986). A Feminist Examination of Family Systems Models of Violence in the Family. In C. Hanson; M. Ault-Riche, Women and Family Therapy, 84-107. Rockville: Aspen.
Casimiro, C. (2008). Violências na conjugalidade: a questão da simetria do género. In Análise Social, 43 (2008) 579-60.
Collins, R. (2008). Violence. A micro-sociological theory. Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Dausien, B. (1999). Geschlechtsspezifische Sozialisation –Konstruktiv(istisch)e Ideen zur Karriere und Kritik eines Konzepts. In B. Dausien; M. Hermann; M. Oechsle; C. Schmerl; M. Stein-Hilbers (Hrsg.), Erkenntnisobjekt Geschlecht. Feministische Perspektiven verwandeln Wissenschaft, 216-246. Leske & Budrich: Opladen.
Dobash, R. P.; Dobash, R. E.; Wilson, M.; Daly, M. (2007). The Myth of Sexual Symmetry. In N. Cook (Ed.), Marital Violence in Gender Relations in Global Perspective. Essential Readings, 173-84. Ontario: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Epstein, C. F. (2007). Great Divides: The Cultural, Cognitive, and Social Bases of the Global Subordination of Women. American Sociological Review, 72 (2007) 1-22.
Fletcher, G. J. (2002). The New Science of Intimate Relationships. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Friedman, M. (2003). Autonomy, Gender, Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frieze, I. H.; McHugh M. C.; Livingston N. (2008). Intimate Partner Violence: Perspectives on Research and Intervention. In F. L. Denmark; M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and Theories, 555-589. Westport: Praeger.
Fuchs, P. (1999). Liebe, Sex und solche Sachen: Zur Konstruktion moderner Intimsysteme. Konstanz: UVK.
Fuchs, S. (2001). Against Essentialism. A theory of Culture and Society. London: Harvard University press.
Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity.
Goodman, L.; Epstein, D. (2008). Listening to battered women: a survivor-centered approach to advocacy, mental health, and justice. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Gucht, D. V. (1994). La religion de l’amour et la culture conjugal. Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, 97 (1994) 328-353.
Hamel, J. (2008). Beyond Ideology: Alternative Therapies for Domestic Violence. In J. Hamel (Ed.) Intimate Partner and Family Abuse. A Casebook of Gender-Inclusive Therapy, 3-15. New York: Springer.
Hardwick, J. (2009). Family Business Litigation and the Political Economies of Daily Life in Early Modern France. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hattery, A. (2009). Intimate partner violence, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Heise, L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4 (1998) 262–290.
Hoffmann, A. (2009). MännerBeben: Das Starke Geschlecht Kehrt Zurück. Grevenbroich: Lichtschlag KG.
Hofstede, G. et al (1999). Temperature, cultural masculinity, and domestic political violence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30 (1999) 291–314.
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57 (1995) 283–294.
Johnson, M. P. (2006). Gendered communication and intimate partner violence. In B. J. Dow; J. T. Wood (Eds.) The Sage Handbook of Gender and Communication, 71-86. London: Sage Publications.
Kappeler, S. (1995). The will to violence: the politics of personal behavior. New York: Teachers College Press.
Kimmel, M. (2005). Gender Symmetry in Domestic Violence A Substantive and Methodological Research Review. In M. Kimmel, The gender of desire: Essays on Male Sexuality, 197-216. Albany: SUNY Press.
Krüger, H. (2001). Gesellschaftanalyse: der Institutionenansatz in der Geschlechterforschung. In G.-A. Knapp; A. Wetterer (Hrgs.), Soziale Verortung der Geschlechter: Gesellschaftstheorie und feministische Kritik, 63-90. Münster: Dampfboot.
Lisboa, M. (Coord.) (2008). Inquérito Nacional Violência de Género. (Memorando Síntese), Lisboa: SociNova / CesNova – FCSH-UNL, 2008. Available at: http://www.sg.maot.gov.pt/Downloads/MEMO_V-GENERO_SINTESE_Final2.pdf Accessed in 05/01/2011.
Luhmann, N. (1990). Sozialssystem Familie. In N. Luhman, Soziologische Aufklärung 5,196-217. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Luhmann, N. (2008). Liebe. Eine Übung. (Hrsg. André Kieserling), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
McKie, L. (2005). Families, Violence and Social Change, Berkshire: Open University Press.
McClennen, J. (2010). Social Work and Family Violence: Theories, Assessment, and Intervention. New York, Springer.
Mechanic, M. B.; Uhlmansiek, M. H.; Weaver, T. L.; Resick, P. A. (2002). Intimate Partner Violence and Stalking Behavior: Exploration of Patterns and Correlates in a Sample of Acutely Battered Women. In K. Davis; I. H. Frieze; R. D. Maiuro (Eds.), Stalking: perspectives on victims and perpetrators, 62-88. New York: Springer.
Meuser, M. (2002). “Doing Masculinity” – Zur Geschlechtslogik männlichen Gewalthandelns. In R. M. Dackweiler; R. Schäfer (Hrsg.), Gewalt Verhältnisse. Feministische Perspektiven auf Geschlecht und Gewalt, 53-78. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Neves, S.; Nogueira, C. (2010). Deconstructing Gendered Discourses of Love, Power, and Violence in Intimate Relationships: Portuguese Women’s Experiences. In D. C. Jack; A. Ali (Org.), Silencing the self across cultures: depression and gender in the social world, 241-261. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nicolaidis, C.; Paranjape, A. (2009). Defining Intimate Partner Violence: Controversies and Implications. In C. Mitchell, Intimate Partner Violence. A Health-Based Perspective, 19-29. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reece, H. (2009). Feminist Anti-violence Discourse as Regulation. In S. D. Sclater; F. Ebtehaj; E. Jackson; M. Richards (Eds.), Regulating Autonomy: Sex, Reproduction and Family, 37-51. Oxford: Hart.
Stark, E.; Flitcraft, A. (1988). Violence Among Intimates: An Epidemiological Review. In V. B. Van Hasselt; R. L. Morrison; A. S. Bellack; M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of Family Violence, 293-318. New York: Plenum.
Stark, E. (2007). Coercive Control. The Entrapment of Women in Personal Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shannon, J. B. (Ed.) (2009), Domestic Violence Sourcebook. 3rd. edition, Detroit, Omnigraphics.
von Braun, C. (2001). Versuch über den schwindel. Religion, Schrift, Bild, Geschlecht. Zürich-Munchen: Pendo Verlag.
Wahl, K. (2009). Aggression und Gewalt: Ein biologischer, psychologischer und sozialwissenschaftlicher Überblick. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
Walker, G. (2003). Crime, Gender and Social Order in Early Modern England. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, L. E. A. (2000). The battered woman syndrome (2.nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Websdale, N. (2010). Familicidal Hearts. The Emotional Styles of 211 Killers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weinbach, C. (2003). Die systemtheoretische Alternative zum Sex-und-Gender-Konzept: Gender als geschlechtsstereotypisierte Form “Person”. In U. Pasero; C. Weinbach (Org.), Frauen, Männer, Gender Trouble. Systemtheoretische Essays, 144-70. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Weinbach, C. (2004). Systemtheorie und Gender Das Geschlecht im Netz der Systeme. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Weinbach, C. (2007). Überlegungen zu Relevanz und Bedeutung der Geschlechterdifferenz in funktional gerahmten Interaktion. In C. Weinbach (Org.), Geschlechtliche Ungleicheit in systemtheoretischer Perspektive, 141-64. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
