Analysis of the Characters in F.M. Dostoyevsky’s Novel “The Idiot” on the Basis of Jung’s Classification of Psychological Types

Authors

  • Marina S. Broitman Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN) (Moscow, Russia)
  • Nika N. Pryakhina Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN) (Moscow, Russia) https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2983-0750

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/cre.v20.30228

Keywords:

Dostoyevsky, “Idiot”, unconscious, psychological type, anima, character
Agencies: Russian Peoples’ Friendship University (RUDN University) (Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The article is devoted to analysing the characters of Dostoievsky's novel "The Idiot" and considers them from the point of view of Jung's typology. The article outlines the principles of Jungian classification of psychological types, based on the dominant, auxiliary and suppressed functions, considering the relationships of the characters from the point of view of complementarity of psychological functions. Analysing their conscious and unconscious attitudes allows us to consider the plot of the novel in a new light. Dostoievsky's female characters are projections of the Anima, that is, the female side of every man's soul. At the same time, the Anima is a collective female image for each person. The destructive actions of the main female characters (Nastasia Filippovna and Aglaia) reflect not only the writer's unconscious distrust of the feminine, but also his perception of modern reality as a situation of enmity, disunity of individuals and the fall of Anima, in other words, the soul of the world, Sophia. The tragic ending of the narrative is the victory (albeit temporary) of irrational forces of the dark aspect of Anima over reason and goodness. It reflects the philosophy of Dostoievsky, who dreamed of universal unity and tragically perceived its impossibility in the modern world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BAXTIN M. M. (2017). Problemy poetiki Dostoyevskogo. Moscow: “E”.

BERDIAYEV N. A. (2019). Mirosozercanie Dostoevskogo. Moscow: Akademichesky poyekt.

GUREVICH P. S. (2001). Klinicheskaya psixologia. Moscow: NOTA BENE.

DOSTOIEVSKI F. M. (1957). Sobranie sochinenij v 10 tomax, Moscow: Izdatelstvo xudozhestvennoy literatury.

DNEPROV V. D. (1978). Idei, strasti, postupki. Leningrad: Sovetskij pisatel.

EVLAMPIEV I. I. (2012). Vo chto veril Dostoievski. Vestnik, 1, 150-162. URL:

https://rhga.ru/science/conferences/rusm/stenogramms/what_dostoevskii_believed_in.php

KASTKINA T. A. (2023). My budiem - litsa… Moskva: IMLI RAN.

КRAMINSKAYA N. M. (2016). Dialektika soznatelnogo i bezsoznatelnogo v filosofskix vozzreniax F. M. Dostoevskogo. Izvestiya Tulskogo universiteta, 120-128. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dialektika-soznatelnogo-i-bessoznatelnogo-v-filosofskih-vozzreniyah-f-m-dostoevskogo.

PEREVOZKINA Yu. N. (2014). Arxetipy sovremennoy zhenschiny. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya, 1 (44). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/arhetipy-sovremennoy-zhenschiny/viewer.

RUSHANINA N. P. (2017). Zhensky vopros v Rossii y osnovnye podxody k yego izucheniyu v dorevolutsionny perio. Vestnik CHelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1 (2). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zhenskiy-vopros-v-rossii-i-osnovnye-podhody-k-ego-izucheniyu-v-dorevolyutsionnyy-period/viewer

XAFIZOVA N. V. (2015). Zhenskie arkhetipy v romane Dostoevskogo “Idiot”. Tekhnogolos, 4, 45-56. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zhenskie-arhetipy-v-romane-f-m-dostoevskogo-idiot.

YUNG K.G. (1995). Psixologicheskiye tipy. Moscow: Progress

YUNG E. (2022). Anima y Animus. Moscow: Centr gumanitarnyx iniciativ Dobrosvet

Published

2024-12-29

How to Cite

Broitman, M. S., & Pryakhina, N. N. (2024). Analysis of the Characters in F.M. Dostoyevsky’s Novel “The Idiot” on the Basis of Jung’s Classification of Psychological Types. Cuadernos De Rusística Española, 20, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.30827/cre.v20.30228

Issue

Section

Literature