The Problem of Evil in Plotinus: Plotinus, Ennead I 8 [51]

Maria Manuela Brito Martins

doi:10.30827/floril.v32i.21474

Autores/as

Maria Manuela Brito Martins Faculdade de Teologia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/floril.v32i.21474

Palabras clave:

Evil, Good, Matter, Non-Being, Exoteric, Esoteric, Platonic, Neoplatonic

Resumen

First the aim of my study is to focus on Plotinus’s conception of evil, as presented in both Ennead I 8 [51]. However, this is not the only place that Plotinus speaks about this subject. In other treatises he speaks about the evil in a context of human freedom and destiny, like Ennead III, 1 [3, III, 2 [47] and III 3 [48] or in the Ennead IV 8 [6] On the descent of soul into bodies. The big difference between Enneads I, 8, and Enneads III and IV is that the treatises that touch on evil are being analyzed in terms of mainly anthropological and existential issues. On the contrary, in Ennead I 8 [51] the problem of evil has a mainly metaphysical and theodicy treatment. We will mainly analyze the notion of absolute evil, and its consequences for the notion of matter.

Second, we intend to address the possible esoteric influences on the issue of evil in Plotinus. We will try to argue that Plotinus, in the confrontation with the Gnostics, particularly in the treaty 33, that we find elements consonant with the treaty 51, and that come from a Christian and not a Gnostic influence. This one will be more esoteric than exoteric, contrary to the doctrine professed by certain Neoplatonists, after Plotinus, where exoteric and esoteric elements are mixed with philosophical thought.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Plotinus and other sources

PLOTIN (1976), Ennéades I. Texte établit et traduit par Emile Bréhier. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.

PLOTINI OPERA, I-III (1983), Ed. P. Henry & H.-R. Schwyzer. Oxonii, E. Typog- rapheo Clarendoniano (editio minor in the series Scriptorum Classicorum Bibliotheca Oxoniensis).

PLOTINUS (1989), Enneads I-VI. With an English translation by A. H. Armstrong. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.

CLEMENS ALEXANDRINUS (1857), Opera quae exstant omnia (PG 9). Paris, apud J. P. Migne.

DIOGENES LAERTIUS (1964), Vitae philosophorum.VIII, 25. Recognivit Brevique Adnotatione critica instruxit. H. S. Long. Oxonii, Typographeo Clarendoniano. EUSEBIUS OF CAESAREA (1903), Praeparatio Evagelica, tomus III. Translation by E. T. Gifford. Oxonii, E. Typographeo Academico.

GREGORIUS NYSSENUS (1863), Contra Eunomium. (PG 45 and 46). Paris, apud J. P. Migne.

IAMBLICHUS (1818), Life of Pythagoras. Translated from the Greek by Th. Taylor. London, J. M. Watkins.

IAMBLICHUS (1891), Communi mathematica scientia liber. Edidit N. Festa. Lipsiae, in Aedibus B. G. Teubner.

IAMBLICHUS (1963), Pythagoras. Legende, Lehre, Lebensgestaltung (graece et germanice). Herusgegeben, Übersetz und Eingeleitet, von M. von Albrecht. Zurich und Stuttgart, Artemis Verlag.

MICHAEL PSELLUS (1971), Expositio in Oracula chaldaica (PG 122, 1137C); fr. 88 in Oracles Chaldaïques, avec un choix de commentaires anciens. Texte établit et traduit par E. des Places. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.

NUMENIUS (1973), Fragments. Texte établi et traduit par Edouard des Places. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.

ORIGENES (1857), Contra Celsum libri octo. (PG 11). Paris, apud J. P. Migne.

ORIGENE (1980), Traité des principes, tome III. Introduction, texte critique de la philocalie et de la version de ufin, traduction par H. Crouzel e M. Simonetti. Paris, Editions du Cerf.

PHILON D’ALEXANDRIE (1966), Quis rerum divinarum heres sit, (SC 15). Paris, Cerf.

PLUTARCH (1967), Against Colotes 1115 b - c, vol. 14. English translation by B. Einarson and P. H. de Lacy. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, William Heinemann (The Loeb Classical Library).

PLUTARCH’S MORALIA (2003), Isis and Osiris, vol. V. Translated by Cole Babbitt. Cambridge (MA)-London, Harvard University Press.

PORPHYRY (1969), On the Life of Plotinus. Ennead I, translated by A. H. Arm- strong. Harvard, University Press.

PROCLI DIADOCHI (1960), Tria Opuscula (De providentia, libertate, malo). Latine Guilelmo de Moerbeka vertente et Graece ex Isaacii Sebastocratoris alio- rumque scriptis colecta. Ed. H. Boese. Berolini, Walter de Gruyter (Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie, 1).

SIMPLICIUS (1862), In Aristotelis physicorum libros quattuor priores, commentaria, Consilio et Auctoritate Academiae litterarum Regiae Borussicae. Hermannus Diels. Berolini, Typis et Impensis G. Reimeri.

Studies

AFONNASIN, E., DILLON J. & FINAMORE, J. (eds.) (2012), Iamblichus and the Foun- dations of Late Platonism. Leiden, Brill.

DILLON, J. (1996), The Platonists 80 B.C. to A. D. 220. (Revised edition with a new afterword). Ithaca-New York, Cornell University Press.

FULLER, B. A. G. (1912), The Problem of Evil in Plotinus. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

GUTHRIE, K. S. (1917), Numenius of Apamea. The Father of Neoplatonism. Lon- don, G. Bell and Sons.

NARBONNE, J.-M. (1993), “Introduction”, in Plotin. Les deux matières, [Ennéade II, 4 (12)]. Introduction, texte grec, traduction et commentaire par Jean- Marc Narbonne. Paris, Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.

NARBONNE, J.-M. (1997), «Aristote et le mal», Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8: 87-103.

NARBONNE, J.-M. (2011), «Study one: The controversy over the generation of mat- ter in Plotinus: the riddle resolved?», in R. J. Berchman & J. F. Finamore (eds.), Plotinus in Dialogue with the Gnostics. Leiden-Boston, Brill.

O’BRIEN, D. (1971), «Plotinus on Evil. A study in Matter and then Soul in Ploti- nus’ Conception of Human Evil» in Le Neoplatonisme. Colloques Interna- tionaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Paris, Éditions du CNRS: 113-147.

O’BRIEN, D. (1991), Plotinus on the origin of matter. An exercice in the interpre- tation of the Enneads. Napoli, Bibliopolis.

OPSOMER, J. (2001), «Proclus versus Plotinus on Matter (de malorum subsistentia, 30,7)», Phronesis 46.2: 154-167.

OPSOMER, J. (2007), «Some Problems with Plotinus’ Theory of Matter/Evil. An Ancient Debate Continued», Quaestio 7: 165-189.

OPSOMER, J. & STEEL, C. (2003), On the existence of Evils. Translated by J. Op- somer and C. Steel. Ithaca (NY), Cornell University Press.

PUECH, H. CH. (1960), «Plotin et les Gnostiques», in E. R. Dodds et al. (eds.), Les sources de Plotin. Dix exposés et discussions. Vandoeuvres-Geneva, Fondation Hardt (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique, vol. V): 159-190.

Thesaurus Linguae Graecae: http://tlg.uci.edu/Iris/canon/csearch.jsp.

VACHEROT, E. (1844), Historie critique de l’école d’Alexandrie, tome I. Paris, Librairie philosophique de Ladrange.

WASZINK, J. H (1966), «Porphyrios und Numenios», in H. Dörrie et al. (eds.), Porphyre. Huit exposés suivis de discussions. Vandoeuvres-Genève, Fonda- tion Hardt (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique, XII): 35-78.