Postroad as a Linguocultural Space of a Literary Text
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/cre.v15i0.9344Keywords:
postroad, language, culture, space, literary text, language personalityAbstract
The article is devoted to the description of the concept of the “post road” in the literary text and linguocultural features of its perception by the linguistic personality of Russian and foreign writers. Being one of the most significant categories of human understanding of the world the space is the basis for the formation of the plot and ideological structure of the literary text which in turn is interpreted as the most perfect verbal-speech form of systematizing information about the surrounding world. The space has an ability to show the individual and aesthetic nature of the artistic interpretation of reality. The article emphasizes that the ways of transmitting national and cultural information are universal for texts created by different language personalities since each native speaker, using the opportunities provided by the language and conceptual systems, voluntarily (or rather unwittingly) introduces national mental stereotypes into the text.Downloads
References
AKHMANOVA, O. S., GYUBBENET, I. V. (1977): «Vertikal`ny`j kontekst» kak filologicheskaya problema. Voprosy` yazy`koznaniya. 3. S. 47–54.
BOGDANOVICH, G. Yu. (2004): «O lingvokul`turnoj situacii v polie`tnichnoj srede», Kul`tura narodov Prichernomor`ya. 49. T.1. S. 83–87.
BORISOVA, E. B. (2010): Khudozhestvenny`j obraz v anglijskoj literature XX veka: tipologiya – lingvopoe`tika – perevod: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Samara.
BRANDES, M. P. (1989): Yazy`kovoj stil` khudozhestvennogo povestvovaniya (na materiale nemeczkoj khudozhestvennoj prozy`): avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk. Kiev.
CHEKHOV, A. P. (1982): Sochineniya v 2-kh t. T. 1. Khudozhestvennaya literatura. Moskva.
GILYAROVSKIJ, V. (1981): Moskva i moskvichi. Khudozhestvennaya literatura. Moskva.
GOGOL`, N. V. (1984): Izbranny`e sochineniya. T. 2. Khudozhestvennaya literatura. Moskva.
GOT`E, T. (1988): Puteshestvie v Rossiyu. My`sl`. Moskva.
DEMIN, L. (1991): S mol`bertom po zemnomu sharu: Mir glazami V. V. Vereshhagina. My`sl`. Moskva.
DIBROVA, E. I. (1996): «Fenomeny` teksta: kul`turofilologicheskij i psikhofilologicheskij», Filologiya – Philologica, 10. S. 2–5.
KARASIK, V. I. (2019): Yazy`kovy`e mosty` ponimaniya. Diskurs. Moskva
KATERMINA, V. V. (2016): Nominacii cheloveka: nacional`no-kul`turny`j aspekt (na materiale russkogo i anglijskogo yazy`kov): FLINTA. Moskva.
KATERMINA, V. V. (2017): «Yuridicheskie nominacii v khudozhestvennom diskurse: osobennosti ikh vospriyatiya yazy`kovoj lichnost`yu avtora». Cuadernos de Rusística Española. 13. Pp. 169–180.
KOROVIN, K. (2016): Rasskazy` o lyubvi k lyudyam. Knizhny`j Klub Knigovek. Moskva.
MASLOVA, V. A. (2001): Lingvokul`turologiya. Izdatel`skij centr «Akademiya». Moskva.
NAZAROVA, T. B. (1994): Filologiya i semiotika. Vy`sshaya shkola. Moskva.
NOVIKOV, A. I. (1982): Pushkin v izgnanii. Pushkin v Mikhajlovskom. Kniga. Moskva.
PUSHKIN, A. S. (1982): Sochineniya v 2 tomax. T. 2. Khudozhestvennaya literatura. Moskva.
RADISHHEV, A. N. (1981): Puteshestvie iz Peterburga v Moskvu. Khudozhestvennaya literatura». Leningrad.
SEMENOVA, P. V. (2019): Kognitivno-semanticheskaya model` khudozhestvennogo prostranstva angloyazy`chnogo proizvedeniya (na materiale Ie`na Mak``yue`na “Atonement” : dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Ufa.
TURAEVA, Z. YA. (1986): Lingvistika teksta (tekst: struktura i semantika). Izdatel`stvo Prosveshhenie. Moskva.
TY`NYANOV, YU. N. (1984): Smert` Vazir-Mukhtara. Pravda. Moskva.
USHAKOV, D. N. (1994): Tolkovy`j slovar` russkogo yazy`ka. T. 3. Russkie slovari. Moskva.
ZAMYATIN, D. N. (2006): Kul`tura i prostranstvo: Modelirovanie geograficheskikh obrazov. Znak. Moskva.
