The Myth of Daedalus and Icarus in the Russian Poetry of the XIX-XXI Centuries: Stages and Ways of Plot Development

Autores/as

  • Tatiana Ye. Avtukhovich Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno (Grodno, Belarus)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/cre.v20.31186

Palabras clave:

myth, Daedalus, Icarus, plot, motif, Russian poetry of the XIX-XXI century
Agencias: Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno (Grodno, Belarus)

Resumen

The article examines the history of the myth of Daedalus and Icarus in Russian poetry of the XIX-XXI centuries in the context of a changing socio-cultural, aesthetic and literary situation; identifies ways to develop and directions of value transformation of the myth. To this end, the initial plot–forming motives of the myth are revealed – the motive of heroic resistance to the gods and the motive of overcoming the limitations of human nature; the conflictogenic situation of the ancient myth is characterized - the situation of violation of prohibitions; The question is raised that the syncretism of myth, in which the abstract and the concrete are inextricably fused, makes its symbolic interpretation possible; the main semantic oppositions (man/personality – world/society) and the directions of myth development in European literature and art of the rhetorical era are outlined. The main part of the article it is shown that in Russian poetry, for two centuries, the plot of the ancient myth has been going through several stages of development: from the assimilation of myth as a common word of culture (Pushkin) through the actualization of the symbolic content of images and psychological reflection (Fet, Nadson), then the development of the associative field of the symbol and correlation with reality as a universal code (S. Kissin, Sasha Cherny, V. Bryusov) and the creation of an individually creative myth (Nabokov, Pasternak) for demythologization (Sapgir, Antokolsky, Sosnora, Avaliani, Brodsky, Kushner) towards the destruction of the myth (Levchenko, Strongovsky, Feldman). It is revealed that the functioning of the myth reflects the value transformations of Russian society: the stage of heroization and idealization of the act of Daedalus and Icarus is replaced by an ironic decline in images, the emptying of their semantics.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Alekseeva, E. (2002): Mif ob Ikare – sovremennaya versiya: Mif kak strukturoobrazuyushchaya podsistema poeticheskoy knigi. V kn.: Tekst khudozhestvennyy: v poiskakh utrachennogo. Petrozavodsk, izdatel'stvo Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vypusk 1. S. 4–10.

Antokol'skiy, P. G. (1986): Izbrannye proizvedeniya. V 2 tomakh. Tom 2. Moskva, Khudozhestvennaya literatura.

Avaliani, D. (2001): Palindromy. Retrieved from https://rvb.ru/np/publication/01text/19/01avaliani.htm?ysclid=lvml7em3sk588247856.

Avtukhovich, T. (2022): «Padenie Ikara» N. Gorbanevskoy: poetika ne-ekfrasticheskogo tsikla. V kn.: Veshchestvo poezii. Moskva, RGGU. S. 220–229.

Avtukhovich, T. (2023): Stikhotvorenie U.K. Uil'yamsa «Peyzazh s padeniem Ikara» v kontekste traditsii kak interpretatsiya interpretatsiy. V kn.: V krugu druzey, kolleg, uchenikov. Elets, Eletskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. I.A. Bunina. S. 20–29.

Bakhtin, M.M. (1986): K metodologii gumanitarnykh nauk. V kn.: Bakhtin, M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. Moskva, Iskusstvo. S. 381–393.

Brodskiy, I. (2005): Stikhotvoreniya i poemy. Retrieved from https://www.booksite.ru/fulltext/0/001/005/031/002.htm?ysclid=lvmlocazcd324301780.

Broytman, S. (2004): Istoricheskaya poetika. V kn.: Teoriya literatury. V 2 tomakh. Tom 2. Moskva, izdatel'skiy tsentr «Akademiya».

Bryukhanova Yu.M. (2010): Tvorchestvo Borisa Pasternaka kak khudozhestvennaya versiya filosofii zhizni. Irkutsk, izdatel'stvo Irkutskogo universiteta.

Bryusov, V. Ya. (1973): Sobranie sochineniy. V 7 tomakh. Moskva, Khudozhestvennaya literatura.

Chernyy, Sasha. (2020): Pobeda. Retrieved from http://cherny-sasha.lit-info.ru/cherny-sasha/stihi/pobeda.htm?ysclid=lvmnmorhqe507161191.

Dobritsyn, A. A. (2013/2014): Iter vitae, lepton ochema, trionfo del tempo “telega zhizni”. Philologica. Tom 10. S. 17–40.

Drevnegrecheskaya doska ob"yavleniy. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.anekdot.ru/id/1104277/?ysclid=lvm4w0jdgo494253556.

Fel'dman, Ya. (2000): Ikar nepogibshiy. Retrieved from https://stihi.ru/2000/07/08-18?ysclid=lvm4a07xer171606073.

Fet, A. A. (1982): Sochineniya. V 2 tomakh. Tom 1. Moskva: Khudozhestvennaya literatura.

Freydenberg, O. (1997): Poetika syuzheta i zhanra. Moskva: Labirint.

Golosovker, E. (1987): Logika mifa. Moskva, Nauka.

Goratsiy. (1970): Ody. Epody. Satiry. Poslaniya. Moskva, Khudozhestvennaya literatura.

Ikar. V kn.: Slovar'-ukazatel' syuzhetov i motivov russkoy literatury. (2008). Novosibirsk: izd-vo SO RAN. Vyp. 3, ch. 1. S. 262–265.

Ivanov, V.V., Toporov, V.N. (2000): Orel. V kn.: Mify narodov mira. V 2 tomakh. Tom 2. Moskva, izdatel'stvo «Bol'shaya Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya». S. 258–260.

Kissin, S. (2019): Stikhi. Retrieved from https://rvb.ru/20vek/silver-age/1900-e/06/046-samuil-kissin-muni.html?ysclid=lvmmdadtw7446223462.

Knabe, G. (2000): Russkaya antichnost'. Moskva, RGGU.

Kushner, A. (2019): Poseshchenie. Retrieved from https://iknigi.net/avtor-aleksandr-kushner/184428-poseschenie-aleksandr-kushner/read/page-9.html.

Levchenko, A. (2000): Sluchay. Retrieved from https://magazines.gorky.media/arion/2000/1/vechera-na-hutore-bliz-pekina.html.

Losev, A. (1957): Antichnaya mifologiya v ee istoricheskom razvitii. Moskva, Uchpedgiz.

Meletinskiy, E. (2000): Poetika mifa. Moskva, Vostochnaya literatura.

Nabokov, V. (1979): Stikhi. Michigan, Ardis/Ann Arbor.

Nadson, S. (2001): Polnoe sobranie stikhotvoreniy. Sankt-Peterburg, Akademicheskiy proekt.

Osherov, S. (1977): Poeziya «Metamorfoz». V kn.: Ovidiy. Metamorfozy. Moskva, Khudozhestvennaya literatura. S. 5–27.

Pasternak, B. L. (1989): Sobranie sochineniy. V 5 tomakh. Tom 1. Moskva, Khudozhestvennaya literatura. 383–384.

Pushkin A. S. (1974): Sobranie sochineniy. V 10 tomakh. Tom 1. Moskva, Khudozhestvennaya literatura.

Sapgir, G. (2004): Stikhotvoreniya i poemy. Sankt-Peterburg, Akademicheskiy proekt. S. 92–93.

Shraer-Petrov, D., D. Shraer M. (2004): Psalmopevets Sapgir. V kn.: Sapgir G. Stikhotvoreniya i poemy. Sankt-Peterburg, Akademicheskiy proekt. S. 5–57.

Sosnora, V. (1982): Pesn' lunnaya. Leningrad, Sovetskiy pisatel'.

Strongovskiy, I. (2005): Glubokovortu. Retrieved from https://polutona.ru/?show=1109004153&ysclid=lvm3kyzn3c653157828.

Takho-Godi, A. (2000): Dedal. V kn.: Mify narodov mira: Entsiklopediya. V 2 tomakh. Tom 1. Moskva, izdatel'stvo «Bol'shaya Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya». S. 363.

Tyupa, V. (1999): Traditsionnost' novogo (tekstoporozhdayushchaya motivika pushkinskogo nabroska). V kn.: Literaturnoe proizvedenie: Syuzhet i motiv. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo SO RAN. Vyp. 1. S. 29–36.

Tyutchev, F.I. (1987): Polnoe sobranie stikhotvoreniy. Leningrad, Sovetskiy pisatel'.

Publicado

2024-12-29

Cómo citar

Avtukhovich, T. Y. (2024). The Myth of Daedalus and Icarus in the Russian Poetry of the XIX-XXI Centuries: Stages and Ways of Plot Development. Cuadernos De Rusística Española, 20, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.30827/cre.v20.31186

Número

Sección

Literatura