From the Panopticon to the Pankinetic. Big Happy Brother and Technofascism in the Algoricene. From Biopower to Ontopower, and why AI has no Future

Authors

  • Jaime del Val

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/pcc.27.2024.34378

Keywords:

algoriceno, pancoreografico, ontopoder, hipercapital, inteligencia corporal

Abstract

The current mutations of power require a new conceptual framework, summarized here in several shifts. On the one hand, we move from the panopticon model theorized by Foucault, associated with visual surveillance, to a panchoreographic model that organizes the movements of bodies in every mode and scale. On the other, we move from a biopower that optimizes the performance of bodies in
the industrial extractivist system to an ontopower that capitalizes on the future and an affect-capital and hypercapital that capitalizes every behavior, where we are the product—a new form of allencompassing extractivism. All of this is associated with a docilization of populations where “Big Brother” allies with “Brave New World,” creating a dystopia that dwarfs all known science fiction, where we are at the mercy of unknowable algorithms that shape our very perception and the domain of the thinkable, at the service of toxic disinformation. However, all of this occurs as the final phase of an era of exploitation that has no future, since these same extractive technologies are causing breakdown and ecosocial collapse. The age of algorithms, or the Algoricene, is also the age of extinctions, as it goes against the symbiotic and diversifying logic of life. We therefore urgently need to reinvent ourselves beyond these techniques of extinction with a return to the moving body, for the dismantling of exploitative societies, toward a rewilding of the Earth. The future is not AI but BI (Body Intelligence).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AGAMBEN, Giorgio. 2000. Medios sin Fin. Notas Sobre la Política. Traducción de Antonio Gimeno Cuspinera. Valencia: Pretextos

AGAMBEN, Giorgio. 2007.Qu’est-ce qu’un dispositif? París: Éditions Payot & Rivages

AGUDO, Ujue y KARLOS G. Liberal. 2024. El Algoritmo Paternalista.

Cuando mande la inteligencia artificial. Katakrak

AHMED, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Duke Univ. Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822388074

AUSTIN, John. L. 1998. Cómo hacer cosas con palabras. Barcelona: Paidós

BENCH, Harmony. 2009. “Computational Choreographies: Performance in Dance Online.” The International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 5, nos. 2–3: 155–69. DOI: 0.1386/padm.5.2-3.155/1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/padm.5.2-3.155/1

BINOTTO, Marco. 2000. Pestilenze. Roma: Castelvecchi

BRATTON, Benjamin H. 2015. The Stack. On Software and Sovereignity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

BROSSAT, Ian. 2019. Airbnb, La Ciudad Uberizada. Navarra: Katakrak Ed.

BUTLER, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. Feminism and the subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge

———. 1997. Excitable Speech. A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge

CHAYKA, Kyle 2024. Mundofiltro. Cómo los algoritmos han aplanado la cultura. Gatopardo Ensayo.

DEBORD, Guy. 1999. La Sociedad del Espectáculo. Traducción de José Luis Pardo Torio. Valencia: Pre-textos

Del Val, Jaym*/Jaime. 2006. “Cuerpos Frontera. Imperios y resistencias en el post-postmoder-nismo”, Artnodes #6 – Organicitats

[e-journal] [online]: https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Artnodes/arti-

cle/view/ 53108/61082

———. 2009a. “Cuerpo común y guerra de los afectos. Coreografías globales y cuerpos en serie del Afectocapital.” CIC Cuadernos de Información y comunicación, Volumen 14,121-139. Corrientes de

Investigacion en Comunicación Interpersonal. Eva Aladro Vico, Ed. Madrid: Universidad Complutense. Online: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CIYC/article/view/CIYC0909110121A/7222

———. 2009b. “Coreografías globales y cuerpos amorfos. Pancoreográfico, cuerpos en serie y Capitalismo de los Afectos.” El Rapto

de Europa, no 14 (June), 63-72. Entre Cuerpos. Nuria Valverde y José

Duarte, Eds. Madrid: Calamar Ediciones. – reverso.org/texts/Del-Val-2009-COREOGRAFIAS-GLOBALES-Y-CUERPOS-AMORFOS—Rapto-de-Europa.pdf

———. 2017. “Algoriceno. Ecologías mayores y menores en la era del Big Data”. En Debates sobre la Investigación en Artes, 48-61. Guayaquil: UArtes Ediciones. Online: http://www.uartes.edu.ec/

institucional/index.php/ download/ilia/?wpdmdl =1666&master-key=59e7ea85dae70 y www.reverso.org/texts/DelVal-2017-Algoriceno-Ecologias-mayores-y-menores.pdf

———. 2018a. “Ontohacking: Ontoecological politics in the Algoricene”. Leonardo, 51(2), 187–188. Disponible online: www.reverso.org/texts/DelVal-2018-Ontohacking--Leonardo-BunB2016.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01521

———. 2018b. “Microsingularities: Body Intelligence, Neuroplastic Ecologies and Antismart Architectures in the Algoricene”. En Balance-Unbalance Conference 2018 Proceedings, pp. 65-69. Anne Nitgen Ed. The Patching Zone, Rotterdam. Online: http://www.reverso.org/texts/DelVal-2018-Microsingularities--BunB2018.pdf

———. 2021a. “The Body is infinite / Body Intelligence. Ontohacking sex-species and the BI r/evolution in the Algoricene.” Journal of

Posthumanism. London: Transational Press. Online: https://journals.tplondon.com/jp/article/view/1447

———. 2021b. “Ontoviolencia en el algoriceno. Hacia una ecología de lo abierto”. En Comparecen los cuerpos. Materias y fronteras, Maya Aguiluz Ed., Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). Acessible online: http://www.reverso.org/texts/Del-Val-2021-ONTOVIOLENCIA-EN-EL-ALGORICENO—-FINAL-sinisbn.pdf

———. 2024a. Ontohackers: Radical movement philosophy in theage of extinctions and algorithms, Part I: Radical Movement Philosophy and the Body Intelligence R/evolution. Milky Way, Earth: punc-

tum books. DOI: 10.53288/0402.1.00. Accesible Online: https://punctumbooks.com/titles/ ontohackers-radical-movement-philoso-

phy-in-the-age-of-algorithms/ – www.ontohackers.com

———. 2024b. “Descolonización terrestre y nuestro futuro como recolectores.” En ¡Cuerpo, Máquina, Acción! Año 8, no 10, pags. 20-38. La Plata, Argentina: Universida de la Plata. Online: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/175275

———. 2025a. Metacuerpos: un Contrapocalipsis. Filosofía del Movimiento y Liberación Terrestre: Deshacer el Supremacismo Humano, en la Era de Algoritmos y Extinciones. Madrid: Reverso-Me-

tabody Ed. ISBN: 978-84-09-70231-2 https://metabody.eu/es/metacuerpos-libro/

———. 2025b. Ontohackers: Radical movement philosophy in the age of extinctions and algorithms, Part II: R/evolution Technologies.

Milky Way, Earth: punctum books. https://punctumbooks.com/titles/ontohackers-radical-movement-philosophy-in-the-age-of-extinc-

tions-and-algorithms-part-ii-r-evolution-technologies/ – www.onto-

hackers.com

DERRIDA, Jacques. 1989. Márgenes de la filosofía. Madrid. Cátedra

DIPROSE, Rosalyn. 1994. “Performing Body identity,” Writings on Dance 11–12: 15. https://www.writingsondance.com/11-12.htm

FLUSSER, Vilém. 2001a. Hacia una filosofia de la fotografía. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis

FOUCAULT, Michel. 1976. Vigilar y Castigar. Nacimiento de la prisión. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI

———. 1977. Historia de la sexualidad 1. La voluntad de saber. México: Siglo XXI

———. 1994. Dits et écrits II. 1976-1988. Paris: Ed. Gallimard

GUTERRES, Antonio. 2022. “Secretary-General’s remarks to High-Level opening of COP27.” UN, Online: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2022-11-07/secretary-generals-remarks-high-level-opening-of-cop27, https://news.un.org/es/story/2022/11/1516697

HAO, Karen. 2021. “How Facebook got addicted to spreading misinformation” MIT Technology Review. MIT. Online: https://www.

technologyreview.com/2021/03/11/1020600/ facebook-responsible-ai-misinformation/. Traducido al castellano en: https://radiolapri-

merisima.com/ como-facebook-se-volvio-adicto-a-la-desinformacion/

HARAWAY, Donna J. 1995. Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres. La reinvención de la naturaleza. Traducción de Manuel Talens. Madrid: Cátedra

HAYLES, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago: University DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001

of Chicago Press

———. 2012. How we think. Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

———. 2017. Unthought. The Power of the Cognitive Nonconsicous. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

LORDE, Audre. 2007. [1984] “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House.” Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. 110-114. Berkeley, CA: Crossing Press

———. 2002. La Hermana, la Extranjera: Articulos y Conferencias. Horas y Horas

MASSUMI, Brian. 2015. Ontopower. War, Powers and the State of Perception. Durham: Duke University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv120qqxv

MUNSTER, Anna. 2013. An Aesthesia of Networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8982.001.0001

ROUVROY, Antoinette. 2013. “The end(s) of critique: data-behaviourism vs. due-process” En Privacy, Due Process and the Computational Turn. Philosophers of Law Meet Philosophers of Technology. Mireille Hildebrandt y Ekatarin De Vries Eds., pp. 147-148. London: Routledge

SERRÀ, J., Á. Corral, M. Boguñá, et al. 2012. “Measuring the Evolution of Contemporary Western Popular Music.” Nature, Scientific

Reports 2, 521. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00521

STIEGLER, Bernard. 2021. “Biopoder, psicopoder y gramatización” Ciencias Sociales y Educación, 10(20), 263-284. Traducción de L. Paláu. Online: https://doi.org/10.22395/csye.v10n20a12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22395/csye.v10n20a12

STONE, Allucquére Rosanne (Sandy). 1996. The War of Technology and Desire at the Close of the Mechanical Age. Cambridge: MIT Press

ZUBOFF, Shoshana. 2020. La era del capitalismo de la vigilancia: La lucha por un futuro humano frente a las nuevas fronteras del poder. Traducción de Albino Santos Mosquera. Barcelona: Paidós

Published

2025-07-04

How to Cite

del Val, J. (2025). From the Panopticon to the Pankinetic. Big Happy Brother and Technofascism in the Algoricene. From Biopower to Ontopower, and why AI has no Future. Papeles De Cultura Contemporánea Hum736, (27), 138–173. https://doi.org/10.30827/pcc.27.2024.34378