Replies to my Critics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/trif.32852Abstract
I am very grateful to the seven philosophers who have taken their time to engage with my ideas and share their reactions. It would be impossible to address their concerns in full without rewriting Pragmatist Semantics. These brief remarks will have to suffice.
Contents:
Reply to Matt Simpson
Reply to Javier González de Prado
Reply to María Cerezo
Reply to Robert Kraut
Reply to Juan José Acero
Reply to Bethany Smith
Reply to Manuel Liz
Downloads
- Captures
- Mendeley - Readers: 1
References
HOPKINS, R. (2007), “What Is Wrong with Moral Testimony?”; Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3), pp. 611-634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00042.x
ISHIGURO, H. (1969), “Use and Reference of Names”; in Studies in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, edited by P. G. Winch. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 20-50.
KÖLBEL, M. (2002), Truth without Objectivity; London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870181
PRICE, H. (2011), “Naturalism without Representationalism”; in Naturalism without Mirrors, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 184-199.
––– (Forthcoming), “Review of Zalabardo, Pragmatist Semantics (Oup, 2023)”, Mind.
QUINE, W. V. ORMAN (1960), Word and Object; Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
ZALABARDO, J. L. (Forthcoming), “Ishiguro’s Wittgenstein”; in Wittgenstein and Other Philosophers, edited by A. Hossein Khani and G. Kemp, London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
