Barra lateral de artículos

Enviado
March 2, 2021
Aceptado
April 25, 2021
Publicado
June 30, 2021
Descargar
PDF PDF (English)
Estadística
Leer contador : 621 Descargar : 343

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Contenido del artículo principal

Resumen

La evaluación tiene un papel muy importante en los procesos de aprendizaje en contextos educativos. Así, las evaluaciones activas, donde el alumno tiene un papel protagonista, cada vez están tomando mayor presencia como complemento a las evaluaciones tradicionales debido a su probado valor formativo. El presente estudio trata de analizar el impacto que tiene sobre las evaluaciones hechas por los alumnos, la experiencia adquirida por dichos alumnos al someterlos a situaciones de evaluación y al recibir feedback por parte del profesor sobre dichas evaluaciones. Para ello, dos grupos naturales de clase realizaron evaluaciones del trabajo realizados por otros grupos y de su propio trabajo. La diferencia entre los grupos radicó en que uno de ellos recibió feedback del profesor tras la evaluación y el otro grupo no. Los resultados analizaron la precisión de los grupos evaluando a otros grupos de compañeros y evaluándose a sí mismo, con respecto a la evaluación del profesor. Los datos mostraron que ambos grupos mejoraron la precisión de las evaluaciones a lo largo de las sesiones, pero la mejora fue significativamente mayor en el caso del grupo que recibió feedback. Estos resultados nos permiten apuntar sobre la importancia de la evaluación dentro del proceso de aprendizaje y de la necesidad de proveer a los alumnos de feedback sobre la evaluación realizada.

Palabras clave

Autoevaluación, Feedback, autorregulación, universitarios

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Parra León, S., & García Martínez, I. (2021). El feedback y la experiencia evaluando como factores determinantes en la autorregulación de los estudiantes. PUBLICACIONES, 51(1), 287–316. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v51i1.20738
Descargar cita
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Referencias

  1. Abella García, V. A., Ausín Villaverde, V., Delgado Benito, V., & Casado Muñoz, R. (2020). Aprendizaje basado en proyectos y estrategias de evaluación formativas: Percepción de los estudiantes universitarios. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 13(1), 93-110. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7408493.pdf
  2. Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
  3. Brown, G. T., & Harris, L. R. (2014). The Future of Self-Assessment in Classroom Practice: Reframing Self-Assessment as a Core Competency. Frontline Learning Research, 2(1), 22-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i1.24
  4. Calle-Álvarez, G. Y. (2020). La rúbrica de autoevaluación como estrategia didáctica de revisión de la escritura. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 10(2), 323-335. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v10.n2.2020.10628
  5. Carroll, D. (2020). Observations of student accuracy in criteria-based self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(8), 1088-1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1727411
  6. Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
  7. Daura, F. T. (2017). Aprendizaje autorregulado e intervenciones docentes en la universidad. Revista Educación, 41(2), 56-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v41i2.21396
  8. Fraile, J., Panadero, E., & Pardo, R. (2017). Co-creating rubrics: The effects on self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and performance of establishing assessment criteria with students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.03.003
  9. Hawe, E., & Dixon, H. (2017). Assessment for learning: a catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1181-1192.
  10. Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Boud, D. (2020). Developing student competence through peer assessment: the role of feedback, self-regulation and evaluative judgement. Higher Education, 80(1), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00469-2
  11. Jónsson, Í. R., Smith, K., & Geirsdóttir, G. (2018). Shared language of feedback and assessment. Perception of teachers and students in three Icelandic secondary schools. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 56, 52-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.003
  12. Kambourova, M. (2020). ¿Qué falta por comprender sobre el concepto autoevaluación (del aprendizaje) en educación superior? Una mirada diferente desde su historia. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas), 25(3), 640-658.
  13. Larruzea-Urkixo, N., & Ramírez, M. O. C. (2020). Diferencias individuales en aprendizaje autorregulado de estudiantes de los Grados de Educación: género, especialidad, notas y desempeño académico. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 38(2), 453-473. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.334301
  14. Lerchenfeldt, S., Mi, M., & Eng, M. (2019). The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMC medical education, 19(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1755-z
  15. Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.30.12200
  16. Panadero, E., Fernández-Ruiz, J., & Sánchez-Iglesias, I. (2020). Secondary education students’ self-assessment: the effects of feedback, subject matter, year level, and gender. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(6), 607-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1835823
  17. Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1253-1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186
  18. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74-98.
  19. Panadero, E., Brown, G. T., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803-830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2
  20. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment: Guidelines for classroom implementation. En Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 311-326). Springer, Cham.
  21. Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4.
  22. Pui, P., Yuen, B., & Goh, H. (2020). Using a criterion-referenced rubric to enhance student learning: a case study in a critical thinking and writing module. Higher Education Research & Development, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1795811
  23. Saiz, M. S. I., & Gómez, G. R. (2020). Aprendiendo a evaluar para aprender en la Educación Superior. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 13(1), 5-8. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7408491.pdf
  24. Siegesmund, A. (2017). Using self-assessment to develop metacognition and self-regulated learners. FEMS microbiology letters, 364(11). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx096
  25. Somervell, H. (1993). Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: the case for self-, peer and collaborative assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180306
  26. Su, W. (2020). Exploring how rubric training influences students’ assessment and awareness of interpreting. Language awareness, 29(2), 178-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1743713
  27. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543068003249
  28. Thawabieh, A. M. (2017). A Comparison between Students’ Self-Assessment and Teachers’ Assessment. Journal of curriculum and Teaching, 6(1), 14-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jct.v6n1p14
  29. Tur, G., Urbina, S., & Forteza, D. (2019). Rubric-Based Formative Assessment in Process Eportfolio: Towards Self-Regulated Learning. Digital Education Review, 35, 18-35. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/DER/article/view/360465
  30. Van der Kleij, F. M., Adie, L. E., & Cumming, J. J. (2017). Using video technology to enable student voice in assessment feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 1092-1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12536
  31. Vicario-Molina, I., Martín-Pastor, E., Gómez-Gonçalves, A., & González-Rodero, L. (2020). Nuevos desafíos en la Educación Superior: análisis de resultados obtenidos y dificultades experimentadas en la realización del Trabajo Fin de Grado de estudiantes de los Grados de Maestro de la Universidad de Salamanca. Revista Complutense de Educación, 31(2), 185-194. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rced.62003
  32. Vickerman, P. (2009). Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: an attempt to deepen learning? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801955986
  33. Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1032-1047.
  34. World Medical Association. (2009). Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the indian medical association, 107(6), 403-405.
  35. Xiao, Y., & Yang, M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students’ self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81, 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.004
  36. Yan, Z. (2020). Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 224-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1629390
  37. Yan, Z., Brown, G. T., Lee, J. C. K., & Qiu, X. L. (2020). Student self-assessment: Why do they do it? Educational Psychology, 40(4), 509-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1672038
  38. Yan, Z., Li, Z., Panadero, E., Yang, M., Yang, L., & Lao, H. (2021). A systematic review on factors influencing teachers’ intentions and implementations regarding formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1884042
  39. Yang, C., Luo, L., Vadillo, M. A., Yu, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000309
  40. Zainuddin, Z., Shujahat, M., Haruna, H., & Chu, S. K. W. (2020). The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: An interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers & Education, 145, 103729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103729
  41. Zhang, Y., Chen, B. L., Ge, J., Hung, C. Y., & Mei, L. (2019). When is the best time to use rubrics in flipped learning? A study on students’ learning achievement, metacognitive awareness, and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1207-1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1553187