Contenido del artículo principal

Resumen

El propósito del artículo es examinar los procesos de inclusión y exclusión para los estudiantes que viven formas interseccionales de exclusión. El documento se basará en una teoría crítica del espacio y el desarrollo urbano y en las teorías críticas de la discapacidad y raza para analizar las experiencias de estudiantes afroamericanos y latinos con discapacidades con reformas neoliberales en el distrito escolar de la Ciudad de Chicago. Si bien estas reformas educacionales han prometido ampliar las opciones educativas de calidad para las familias que de otra manera serían asignadas a escuelas de bajo rendimiento, también han generado nuevas formas de exclusión que afectan de manera única a los estudiantes afroamericanos y latinos con discapacidades. Nombrando esta paradoja de inclusión/exclusión como inclusionismo neoliberal, argumento a favor de una educación inclusiva interseccional.


Palabras clave

educación inclusiva discapacidad neoliberalismo teoría de espacio crítico estudios de discapacidad

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Waitoller, F. R., Beasly, L., Gorham, A., & Kang, V. Y. (2019). Hacia una educación inclusiva interseccional: El caso de los estudiantes afroamericanos y latinos con discapacidades en Chicago. PUBLICACIONES, 49(3), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v49i3.11403

Referencias

  1. Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Improving schools, Developing inclusion.
  2. London, England: Routledge.
  3. Apple, M. W. (2001). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality. New York: Routledge Falmer.
  4. Apple, M. W. (2007). Ideological success, educational failure? On the politics of No Child Left Behind. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(2), 108–116.
  5. Arnaiz, P., & Soto, G. (2003). Special education in Spain at the beginning of the 21st century: The challenge to educate in an unequal and multicultural society. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7(4), 375-388.
  6. Artiles, A. J., & Kozleski, E. B. (2007). Beyond convictions: Interrogating culture, history, and power in inclusive education. Journal of Language Arts, 84, 351–358.
  7. Artiles, A., Kozleski, E. B., Dorn, S., & Christensen, C. (2006). Learning in inclusive education research: Re‐mediating theory methods with a transformative agenda. Review of Research in Education, 30, 65–108.
  8. Bal, A., Afacan, K., & Cakir, H. I. (2018). Culturally responsive school discipline: Implementing learning lab at a high school for systemic transformation. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 1007-1050. doi: 10.3102/0002831218768796
  9. Ball, S. J. (2003). Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Class and Social Advantage. London: Routledge Falmer.
  10. Berhanu, G. (2008). Ethnic minority pupils in Swedish schools: Some trends in over- representation of minority pupils in special educational programs. International Journal of Special Education, 23(3), 17–29.
  11. Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. London, England: Center for Studies on Inclusive Education.
  12. Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing
  13. neoliberalism.” Antipode, 34(3), 349-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00246
  14. Caref, C., Hainds, S., Hilgendorf, K., Jankov, P., & Russell, K. (2012). The black and white of education in Chicago’s public schools. Retrieved from http://www.ctunet.com/questcenter/research/black-andwhite-of-chicago-education.pdf
  15. Chicago Public Schools. (2017). Limited English proficiency, special ed, low income, IEP, School year 2016-2017 (Data file). Retrieved http://cps.edu/SchoolData/Pages/SchoolData.aspx
  16. Chicago Teachers Union Research Department (2015). Special Education Services in Crisis at CPS. Chicago, IL: Chicago Teachers Union. Retrieved from http://www.ctunet.com/blog/new-ctu-report-special-education-crisis-chicago-public-schools
  17. Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  18. Corbett, J., & Slee, R. (2000). An international conversation on inclusive education. In F. Armstrong, D. Armstrong & L. Barton (Eds.), Inclusive education: Policy, contexts and comparative perspectives (pp. 133–146). London, England: David Fulton.
  19. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
  20. Danforth, S., & Naraian, S. (2015). This new field of inclusive education: Beginning a dialogue on conceptual foundations. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53(1), 70-85. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-53.1.70
  21. de la Torre, M., Gordon, M. F., Moore, P., & Cowhy, J. (2015). School closings in Chicago: Understanding families’ choices and constraints for new school enrollment. Chicago: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
  22. De Valenzuela, J. S., Copeland, S. R., Qi, C. H., & Park, M. (2006). Examining educational equity: Revisiting the disproportionate representation of minority students in special education. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 425-441. doi:10.1177/001440290607200403
  23. Dudley-Marling, C., & Baker, D. (2012). The effects of market-based school reforms on students with disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly, 32(2).
  24. Estevan, R. D. (2016). Chicago Public Schools budget review FY 2017. Chicago, IL: Access Living Center for Service, Advocacy and Social Change for people with Disabilities.
  25. Fischman, G., Ball, S., & Gvirtz, S. (2003). Crisis and hope: the educational hopscotch of Latin America. Routledge.
  26. Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the postsocialist condition. London, England: Routledge.
  27. Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  28. Galiani, S., Gertler, P. & Schargrodsky, E. (2008). School decentralization: helping the good get better, but leaving the poor behind. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 10-11, 2106-20.
  29. Gewirtz, S. (2006). Towards a contextualized analysis of social justice in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38, 69–81.
  30. Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability Studies: Theorizing disableism and ableism. London: Routledge.
  31. Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Dis/ability and austerity: beyond work and slow death. Disability & Society, 29(6), 980-984.
  32. Government Accountability Office. (2012). Chárter Schools: Additional Federal Attention Needed to Help Protect Access for Students with Disabilities. (GAO-12-543). Washington DC. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-543.
  33. Gwynne, J., & de la Torre, M. (2009). When schools close: Effects on displaced students’ in Chicago Public Schools. Consortium on Chicago School Research, University of Chicago.
  34. Harry, B., Arnaiz, P., Klingner, J., Sturges, K. (2008). Schooling and the construction of identity among minority students in Spain and the United States. The Journal of Special Education, 42, 15-25.
  35. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  36. Kozleski, E., Artiles, A. & Waitoller, F. (2014). Equity in inclusive education: a cultural historical comparative perspective. In L. Florian The SAGE Handbook of special education (Vol. 2, pp. 231-249). London: SAGE Publications Ltd doi: 10.4135/9781446282236.n16
  37. Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York: Routledge.
  38. McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture “as” disability. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26(3), 324-348.
  39. McLaughlin, M, J., & Jordan, A. (2005). Push and pull: Forces that are shaping inclusion in the United States and Canada. In D. Mitchell (Ed.), Contextualizing inclusive education: Evaluating old and new international perspectives (pp. 89–113). London, England: Routledge.
  40. Mitchell, D. (2015). The biopolitics of disability: Neoliberalism ablenationalism, and peripheral embodiment. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
  41. Farkas, G., & Morgan, P. L. (2018). Risk and race in measuring special education need. Contexts, 17(4), 72-74. doi: 10.1177/1536504218812876
  42. Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85-100.
  43. Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380-404.
  44. Rhim, L. M., Gumz, J., & Henderson, K. (2015). Key trends in special education in chárter schools: A secondary analysis of the civil rights data collection 2011–2012. National Center for Special Education in Chárter Schools. Retrieved from http://static1.squarespace.com/static/52feb326e4b069fc72abb0c8/t/564109d3e4b027fb79 1d1964/1447102931798/crdc_full.pdf
  45. Rose, D. H., Meyer, A., & Hitchcock, C. (2006). The universally designed classroom: Accesible curriculum and digital technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  46. Saltman, K. J. (2014). The politics of education: A critical introduction. New York:
  47. Paradigm Publishers.
  48. Shildrick, M. (2012). Dangerous discourses of disability, subjectivity and sexuality. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
  49. Singal, N., & Jeffery, R. (2011). Inclusive education in India: The struggle for quality in consonance with equity. In A. J. Artiles, E. B. Kozleski, & F. R. Waitoller (Eds.), Inclusive education: Examining equity on five continents (pp. 161–183). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  50. Skiba, R. J., Poloni-Staudinger, L., Gallini, S., Simmons, A. B., & Feggins-Azziz, R. (2006). Disparate Access: The Disproportionality of African American Students with Disabilities Across Educational Environments. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 411-424.
  51. Smith, N. (2008). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. University of Georgia Press, Georgia.
  52. Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social
  53. theory. New York, NY: Verso.
  54. Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling, and inclusive education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  55. Sullivan, A. L. (2011). Disproportionality in special education: Identification and placement of English language learners. Exceptional Children, 77(3), 317–334.
  56. Sweller, N., Graham, L. J., & Van Bergen, P. (2012). The minority report: disproportionate representation in Australia’s largest education system. Council of Exceptional Children, 79(1), 107-125.
  57. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Salamanca, Spain: UNESCO.
  58. UNESCO. (2010). Education for all global monitoring report. Paris: UNESCO.
  59. UNESCO (2015). EFA Global Monitoring Report. Paris: UNESCO.
  60. Waitoller, F. R. (2019). Why are we not more inclusive? An analysis of neoliberal inclusionism. In C. Boyle., S. Mavropoulou., J. Anderson, & A. Page (Eds.), Inclusive Education: Global Issues & Controversies. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Manuscript in press.
  61. Waitoller, F. R., & Annamma, S. A. (2017). Taking a spatial turn in inclusive education. The Wiley handbook of diversity in special education (pp. 23-44). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  62. Waitoller, F. R. & Artiles, A. J. (2013). A decade of professional development research for inclusive education: A critical review and notes for a research program. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 319-356. doi:10.3102/0034654313483905
  63. Waitoller, F. R., Artiles, A. J., & Cheney, D. (2010). The miners’ canary: A review of
  64. overrepresentation research and explanations. Journal of Special Education, 44(1), 29-49.
  65. Waitoller, F. R., & Kozleski, E. B. (2013). Working in boundary practices: Identity development and learning in partnerships for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 35-45. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.11.006
  66. Waitoller, F. R., & Maggin, D. (2018). Can charter schools address racial inequities evidenced in placement patterns in the least restrictive environment? A longitudinal study in Chicago Public Schools. Remedial and Special Education. doi:10.1177/0741932518800392
  67. Waitoller, F. R., Maggin, D. M., & Trzaska, A. (2017). A longitudinal comparison of enrollment patterns of students receiving special education in urban neighborhood and charter schools. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28(1), 3-12.
  68. Waitoller, F. R., & Super, G. (2017). School choice or the politics of desperation? Black and Latinx parents of students with dis/abilities selecting charter schools in Chicago. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(55). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2636
  69. Waitoller, F. R., Nguyen, N., Super, G. (2019). The irony of rigor: ‘No excuses’ chárter schools at the intersections of race and disability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32, 282-298. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2019.1576939
  70. Waitoller, F. R., & Thorius, K. A. K. (2016). Cross-Pollinating culturally sustaining pedagogy and universal design for learning: Toward an inclusive pedagogy that accounts for dis/ability. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 366-389. doi: 10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.366
  71. Weber, R., Farmer, S., & Donoghue, M. (2016). Why these schools? Explaining school closures in Chicago, 2000-2013. Great Cities Institute, University of Illinois at Chicago.
  72. Werning, R., Löser, J. M., & Urban, M. (2008). Cultural and social diversity: an analysis of minority groups in German schools. The Journal of Special Education, 42(1), 47-54.
  73. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.