Contenido del artículo principal

Resumen

En los últimos 30 años ha surgido una tensión en Reino Unido entre las políticas diseñadas para alcanzar la excelencia educativa y las políticas que buscan promover una práctica inclusiva. La descentralización y consiguiente traspaso de competencias a las cuatro jurisdicciones de Reino Unido ha llevado a diferencias en las prácticas desarrolladas a partir de lo que originalmente era un conjunto común de valores y creencias culturales e históricas. En particular los cambios de política en Inglaterra han resultado en incentivos perversos para que las escuelas no satisfagan las necesidades de los estudiantes con necesidades educativas especiales y discapacidades y pueden terminar en su exclusión escolar. Ilustramos el funcionamiento de estos incentivos perversos a través de un análisis histórico cultural de las formas en que los profesionales de diferentes servicios pueden tener diferentes motivos de objeto. Abogamos por prácticas de co-configuración interprofesional y el trabajo en nudos con el fin de lograr relaciones y patrones de comunicación significativos que unan a los servicios para jóvenes con discapacidades y necesidades educativas especiales.

 

Palabras clave

Exclusión escolar exclusión social inclusión necesidades educativas especiales Vygotsky

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Daniels, H., Thompson, I., & Tawell, A. (2019). Prácticas de exclusión en culturas escolares inclusivas en Reino Unido. PUBLICACIONES, 49(3), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v49i3.11402

Referencias

  1. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Educational Policy, 18, 215–228.
  2. Bauman, Z. (2004). Wasted lives: Modernity and its outcasts. Oxford: Polity Press.
  3. Berridge, D., Brodie, I., Pitts, J., Porteouis, D., & Tarling, R. (2001). The independent effects of permanent exclusion from school on the offending careers of young people. Retrieved from http://troublesofyouth.pbworks.com/f/occ71-exclusion.pdf
  4. Children’s Commissioner (2012). They never give up on you: Office of the Children’s Commissioner: School exclusions inquiry. London: Children’s Commissioner for England.
  5. Children’s Commissioner (2013). Always someone else’s problem: Office of the Children’s Commissioner’s report on illegal exclusions. London: Children’s Commissioner for England.
  6. Children’s Commissioner (2017). Briefing: Falling through the gaps in education. London: Children’s Commissioner for England.
  7. Cole, T., Daniels, H., & Visser, J. (2003). Patterns of provision for pupils with behavioural difficulties in England. Oxford Review of Education, 29(2), 187-205.
  8. Cole, T., Daniels, H., & Visser, J. (2012). The Routledge international companion to emotional and behavioural difficulties. London: Routledge.
  9. Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50, 213–229.
  10. Cumella, S., Williams, R., & Sang, R. (1998). How mental health services are commissioned. In: G. Thornicroft and G. Strathdee. Commissioning mental health services (pp.61-71). London: The Stationery Office.
  11. Daniels, H., & Cole, T. (2010). Exclusion from school: Short-term setback or a long term of difficulties? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25(2), 115-130.
  12. Daniels, H., Thompson, I., & Tawell, A. (2017). Patterns and processes: Exclusion from school in England. Scotland: University of West of Scotland.
  13. Department for Education (2018). Permanent and fixed period exclusions in England: 2016 to 2017. London: Department for Education.
  14. Education Select Committee (2018). Forgotten children: Alternative provision and the scandal of ever increasing exclusions. London: HMSO.
  15. Edwards, A., Daniels, H., Gallagher, T., Leadbetter, J., & Warmington, P. (2009). Improving inter-professional collaborations: Multi-agency working for children’s wellbeing. Oxford: Routledge.
  16. Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analysing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In: Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 377-404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Engeström, Y., Brown, K., Cristopher, L., & Gregory, J. (1997). Co-ordination, co-operation and communication in the courts: Expansive transitions in legal work. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 13(4), 88-97.
  18. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Vähääho, T. (1999). When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In: S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. Jenson (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice (pp. 345-374). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
  19. Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Routledge.
  20. Fazel, M., Hoagwood, K., Stephan, S., & Ford, T. (2014). Mental health interventions in schools in high-income countries. Lancet Psychiatry, 1, 377-387.
  21. Glisson, C., & Hemmelgarn, A. (1998). The effects of organizational climate and interorganization and coordination on the quality and outcomes of children’s service systems. Child abuse and neglect, 22(5), 401-21.
  22. IPPR (2017). Making the difference: Breaking the link between school exclusion and social exclusion. London: IPPR.
  23. Lloyd, C. (2008). Removing barriers to achievement: A strategy for inclusion or exclusion? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(2), 221-236.
  24. Lloyd, G., Stead, G., & Hendrick, A. (2001). Hanging on in there: A study of interagency work to prevent school exclusion. London: National Children’s Bureau.
  25. Machin, S., & Sandi, M. (2018). Autonomous schools and strategic pupil exclusion. IZA: Institute of Labor Economics.
  26. Marsh, A. (2015). Funding variations for pupils with special educational needs and disability in England, 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 356-376.
  27. Mills, M, Riddell, S., & Hjörne, E. (2014). After exclusion what? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(6), 561-567.
  28. Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report- A child-centred system. London: Department for Education.
  29. Norwich, B. (2014). Changing policy and legislation and its effects on inclusive and special education: A perspective from England. British Journal of Special Needs Education, 41(4), 403-425.
  30. Ofsted (2018). Managing behaviour in schools – briefing note. London: Ofsted.
  31. Parsons, C. (2018). The continuing school exclusion scandal in England. FORUM, 60(2), 245-254.
  32. Puonti, A. (2004). Learning to work together: Collaboration between authorities in economic-crime investigation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki). Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:952-10-1702-3.
  33. Riddell, S., & McCluskey, G. (2013). Policy and provision for children with social, emotional and behavioural difficulties in Scotland: Intersections of gender and deprivation’. In: T. Cole, H. Daniels, & J. Visser (Eds.), The Routledge international companion to emotional and behavioural difficulties (pp. 57-67). London: Routledge.
  34. Scottish Government (2017). Included, engaged and involved part 2: A positive approach to preventing and managing school exclusions. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
  35. Slee, R. (2012). How do we make inclusive education happen when exclusion is a political predisposition? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 895-907.
  36. The Association of Directors of Children’s Services Ltd (ADCS) (2018). A vision for an inclusive and high performing education system. Manchester: ADCS.
  37. Thompson, I. (2017). Tackling social disadvantage through teacher education. St Albans: Critical Publishing.
  38. Valdebenito, E., Eisner, M., Farrington, D.P., Ttofi, M.M., & Sutherland, A. (2018). School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: A systematic review. Oslo: Campbell Collaboration.
  39. Victor, B., & Boynton, A. (1998). Invented here: Maximizing your organization’s internal growth and profitability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  40. Vulliamy, G., & Webb, R. (2001). The social construction of school exclusion rates: Implications for evaluation methodology. Educational Studies, 27(3), 357-370.
  41. Welsh Government. (2015). Exclusion from schools and pupil referral units. Cardiff: Welsh Government.