Maqāṣid al-Sharī῾a in the Thought of Ṭāhar Ḥaddād and Ibn ῾Āshūr: the Case of Ṭalāq

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30827/meaharabe.v73.25359

Keywords:

Maqāṣid al-sharī῾a. Ṭalāq. Islamic Reformism. Ṭāhar al-Ḥaddād. Ibn ῾Āshūr

Abstract

This paper presents the use of the doctrine of maqāṣid al-sharī῾a in the thought of two Tunisian authors of colonial times, Ṭāhar al-Ḥaddād (1899-1935) and Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir Ibn ῾Āshūr (1879-1973), applying its analysis to the proposals that both scholars made with regards to the institution of ṭalāq (often translated as repudiation). It briefly exposes the origin and development of the theory of maqāṣid, as well as both author’s biography, in order to then compare al-Ḥaddād and Ibn ῾Āshūr’s opinions throughout the study of their main works, which are Imrā’atu-nā fī l-sharī῾a wa-l-mujtama῾ (Our Women in Islamic Law and Society), by al-Ḥaddād, and Tafsīr al-taḥrīr wa-l-tanwīr (Interpretation of Liberation and Enlightment) and Maqāṣid al-sharī῾a al-islāmiyya (The Purposes of Islamic Law), by Ibn ‘Āšūr. The paper concludes that, in both cases, maqāṣid al-sharī῾a was used to sustain reformist readings, but also to justify the persistence of patriarchal practices whose origins can not always be derived literally from the Qur’ān.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AHMAD, Furqan. “Understanding the Islamic Law of Divorce”. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 45, 3-4 (2003), pp. 484-508.

AUDA, Jasser. Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: a System Ap- proach. Londres: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkc67tg

BORRMANS, Maurice. Statut personnel et famille au Maghreb de 1940 à nos jours. París y La Haya: Mouton, 1977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ 9783110819526

El Corán. Traducción de Julio Cortés. Barcelona: Herder, 2005.

ESPOSITO, John L. Women in Muslim Family Law. Nueva York: Syracuse UP, 1982.

FIERRO, Maribel. “Al-Shāṭibī”. En Encyclopaedia of Islam, segunda edición. Leiden: Brill, versión en línea consultada el 19/08/2023.

GIMARET, Daniel. “Mu‘tazila”. En Encyclopaedia of Islam, segunda edición. Leiden: Brill. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_0822.

HADDAD, Gibril Fouad. “Tropology and Inimitability: Ibn ʿĀshūr’s Theory of Tafsīr in the Ten Prolegomena to al-Tahṛīr wa’l-tanwīr”. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 21, 1 (2019), pp. 50-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2019.0368

ḤADDĀD, Tāhar al-. Les pensées et autres écrits. Trad. de Noureddine Sraïeb. Oran: C.R.I.D.S.S.H., 1984.

—. Imrā’atu-nā fī l-šarī῾a wa-l-muŷtama῾. Túnez: al-Dār al-Tūnīsiyya li-l-Našr, 1989.

HERNÁNDEZ-JUSTO, Tatiana. “El movimiento obrero como plataforma para la liberación nacional a través de la obra al-‘Ummal al-tūnisiyyūn wa-ẓuhūr al- ḥaraka al-niqābiyya (1927) de Ṭāhar Ḥaddād”. Revista de Estudios Internacionales Mediterráneos, 28 (2020), pp. 74-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15366/ reim2020.2

HUSSAIN, Syed Jaffer. “Legal Modernism in Islam: Polygamy and Repudia- tion”. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 7, 4 (1965), pp. 384-398.

IBN ‘ĀŠŪR, Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir. Tafsīr al-taḥrīr wa al-tanwīr. Túnez: al-Dār al-Tūnisiyya li-l-Našr, 1970.

—. Maqāṣid al-šarī῾a al-islāmiyya. El Cairo y Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-Miṣrī y Dār al-Kitāb al-Lubnānī, 2011.

KAMALI, Mohammed Hashim. Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society, 1991.

LELONG, Michel. “Tahar Haddad et la civilisation du travail”. Institut des Belles Letres Arabes, 25, 1 (1962), pp. 31-48.

NAFI, Basheer M. (ed.). Islamic Thought in the Twentieth Century. Londres: I. B. Tauris, 2004.

—. “Ṭāhir ibn ʿĀshūr: the career and thought of a modern reformist ʿālim, with special reference to his work of tafsīr”. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 7, 1 (2005), pp. 1-32.

NAVARRO I ORTIZ, E. y LIROLA DELGADO, Jorge. “Al-Šāṭibī, Abū Isḥāq”. En Biblioteca de al-Andalus. Almería: Fundación Ibn Tufayl de Estudios Árabes, 2012, vol. 7, pp. 354-364.

OLMOS ORTEGA, María Elena. “Mujer, matrimonio e Islam”. Anuario de De- recho Eclesiástico del Estado, XXIV (2008), pp. 493-523.

OUALDI, M’hamed. Esclaves et maîtres, les mamelouks des beys de Tunis du XVIIe siècle aux années 1880. París: Éditions de la Sorbonne, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.psorbonne.2469

PÉREZ ÁLVAREZ, Salvador. “Las tradiciones islámicas ante el repudio. Su efi- cacia civil en el derecho del estado español”. Ilu. Revista de Ciencias de las Religiones, 13 (2008), pp. 183-223.

PÉREZ BELTRÁN, Carmelo. “Panorámica sobre el status social de la mujer ma- grebí”. Miscelánea de Estudios Árabes y Hebraicos, Sección Árabe-Islam, 40- 41 (1991-1992), pp. 303-335.

QARĀFĪ, Šihāb al-Dīn al-. Nafā’is al-uṣūl fī šarḥ al-maḥṣūl. vol. II. La Meca: Maktabat Nizār Muṣṭafà al-Bāz, 1993.

SCHACHT, Joseph y LAYISH, Aharon. “Ṭalāḳ”. En Encyclopaedia of Islam, segunda edición. Leiden: Brill, versión en línea consultada el 21/11/2020.

Published

2024-01-17

How to Cite

Hernández-Justo, T. (2024). Maqāṣid al-Sharī῾a in the Thought of Ṭāhar Ḥaddād and Ibn ῾Āshūr: the Case of Ṭalāq. Miscelánea De Estudios Árabes Y Hebraicos. Sección Árabe-Islam, 73, 143–165. https://doi.org/10.30827/meaharabe.v73.25359