On Ibn Ḥazm’s Rhetoric in al-Radd ʿalā Ibn al-Naghrīla
Sobre la retórica de Ibn Ḥazm en al-Radd ‘alà Ibn al-Nagrīla
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30827/meaharabe.v71.15312Keywords:
Ibn Ḥazm, Ibn al-Naghrīla, Taḥrīf, Naskh, ‘IṣmaAbstract
In his polemic composition al-Radd ‘alā Ibn al-Naghrīla al-Yahūdī, Abū Muḥammad ‘Alī b. Aḥmad b. Ḥazm al-Andalusī (994/1064 CE) attempts to demonstrate the Jews’ taḥrīf (falsification) of the Torah by citing several examples. This article intends to shed some light on an important aspect of Ibn Ḥazm’s rhetoric as reflected in al-Radd ‘alā Ibn al-Naghrīla. I argue, however, that by juxtaposing some of Ibn Ḥazm’s arguments with the relevant Jewish sources, we find that in some of these examples he himself deliberately misrepresents and misquotes explicit Torah texts, undermines their authority and overlooks parallel Qur’ānic accounts of which he must have been aware. Ibn Ḥazm’s tendentiousness and double standard in this matter stem from his wish to prove that the Torah was falsified and, by so doing, to lend further support to the Qurʾānic argument regarding the taḥrīf.
Downloads
References
ADANG, Camilla; FIERRO, Maribel and SCHMIDTKE, Sabine (eds.). Ibn Ḥazm of Cordoba: The life and works of a controversial thinker. Leiden: Brill, 2013.
—. Muslim writers on Judaism and the Hebrew Bible: from Ibn Rabban to Ibn Ḥazm. Leiden: Brill, 1996.
ARBERRY, Arthur John (ed.). The Koran interpreted. London: Oxford Universi- ty Press, 1964.
ARNALDEZ, Roger. “Ibn Ḥazm”. Encyclopaedia of Islam2. Leiden: Brill 1971, vol. 3, pp. 791-799.
AL-BALKHĪ, Muqātil b. Sulaymān. Tafsīr Muqātil b. Sulaymān. Beirut: Dār al- Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya, 2003.
BOUŠEK, Daniel. “‘Half of the burden of a mule’: the Mishnah and the Talmud in medieval Muslim literature”. In Jiří BLAZEK; Kamila VEVERKOVÁ, and David BIERNOT (eds.). Šalom. Pocta Bedřichu Noskovi k sedmdesátým na- rozeninám. Brno: Chomutov: L. Marek, 2012, pp. 269-291.
FENTON, Paul B. “Jewish attitudes to Islam: Israel heeds Ishmael”. Jerusalem Quarterly, 29 (1983), pp. 84-102.
FERRE, Lola. “Ibn Da’ud, Abraham ben David ha-Levi”. Encyclopedia of Jews in the Islamic World. Leiden: Brill, 2010, vol. 2, pp. 473-475.
IBN DĀ’ŪD, Abraham. Sefer ha-Emunah ha-Ramah. Translated by Solomon IBN LAVI/Sefer ha-Emunah ha-Nīśaʾāh. Translated by Samuel IBN MAṬŪṬ/The anonymous commentary to Ha-Emunah ha-Ramah. Ed. and an- not. Amira ERAN. Jerusalem: Ben Zvi Institute, 2019.
IBN ḤAZM, Abū Muḥammad ʿAlī b. Aḥmad. Al-Radd ‘alā Ibn al-Naghrīla al- Yahūdī wa-Rasā’il Ukhrā. Ed. Iḥsān ‘ABBĀS. Cairo: Maktabat Dār al- ‘Urūba, 1960.
LAZARUS-YAFEH, Hava. “Taḥrīf”. Encyclopaedia of Islam2. Leiden: Brill, 2000, vol. 10, pp. 111-112.
—. Intertwined worlds: medieval Islam and Bible criticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.
MADELUNG, Wilfred and TYAN. Émile. “‘Iṣma”. In Encyclopaedia of Islam2. Leiden: Brill, 1978, vol. 4, pp. 182-184.
AL-MAḤALLĪ, Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad b. Aḥmad and AL-SUYŪṬĪ, Jalāl al- Dīn ‘Abd al-Raḥmān b. Abū Bakr. Tafsīr al-Jalālayn. Cairo: Mu’assasat al- Mukhtār, 2004.
MAIMONIDES, Moses. Commentary on the Mishnah: Seder Nezīqīn. Trans. and ed. Yosef QĀFIḤ. Jerusalem: Rabbi Kook Institute, 1965. [in Hebrew].
AL-MĀWARDĪ, Abū l-Ḥasan ‘Alī b. Muḥammad b. Ḥabīb. Tafsīr al-Māwardī: al-Nukat wa-l-‘uyūn. Kuwait: Wizārat al-Awqāf wa-l-Shu’ūn al-Islāmiyya, al- Turāth al-Islāmī, 1982.
MAZUZ, Haggai. “Ibn Ḥazm and Midrash”. Journal of Semitic Studies, 62, 1 (2017), pp. 137-152.
AL-NAYSĀBŪRĪ, Abū l-Ḥasan ‘Alī l-Naysābūrī. Asbāb al-nuzūl. Cairo: Mu’assasat al-Ḥalabī, 1968.
PERLMANN, Moshe. “The medieval polemics between Islam and Judaism”. In
S. D. GOITEIN (ed.). Religion in a religious age. Cambridge: Massachusetts Association for Jewish Studies, 1974, pp. 103-138.
—. “Andalusian authors on the Jews of Granada”. Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, 18 (1948-1949), pp. 269-289.
POWERS, David. “Reading/Misreading one another’s scripture: Ibn Ḥazm’s Re- futation of Ibn al-Naghrīla al-Yahūdī”. In William M. BRINNER and Stephen
D. RICKS (eds.). Studies in Islamic and Judaic Traditions II: Papers Presented at the Institute for Islamic-Judaic Studies. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1986, pp. 109-121.
ROTH, Norman Roth. Jews, Visigoths and Muslims in medieval Spain. Leiden: Brill, 1994.
—. “Forgery and abrogation of the Torah: a theme in Muslim and Christian po- lemic in Spain”. Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, 54 (1987), pp. 203-236.
SHEMESH, Hanna. “Ibn Ḥazm’s Al-Radd ‘alā Ibn al-Naghrīla”. In Hava LA- ZARUS-YAFEH (ed.). Muslim authors on Jews and Judaism: the Jews among their Muslim neighbours. Jerusalem: The Zalman Shazar Center for Jewish History, 1996, pp. 83–118 [in Hebrew].
STROUMSA, Sarah. “From Muslim heresy to Jewish-Muslim polemics: Ibn al- Rāwandī’s Kitāb al-Dāmigh”. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 107 (1987), pp. 767-772.
TARGARONA, Judit. “Ibn Naghrella, Samuel (Abū Ibrāhim Ismā‘īl) ben Joseph ha-Nagid”. Encyclopedia of Jews in the Islamic World. Leiden: Brill, 2010, vol. 2, pp. 512-516.
TURKI, Abdel-Magid. “Al- Ẓāhiriyya”. Encyclopaedia of Islam2. Leiden: Brill 2002, vol. 11, pp. 394-396.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors publishing their work in this journal agree to the following terms and conditions:
1. The authors retain the copyright and give the journal the right to be the first publication of the work and also to be licensee under a Creative Commons Attribution License which allows others to share the work, provided the author of the work and the initial publication in this journal are acknowledged.
2. Authors may make additional agreements separately for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, putting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to electronically disseminate (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own web page) the published version of their works (publisher's post-print version) or, if not possible, the author's reviewed and accepted post-print version. This is to facilitate productive exchanges, and allow for earlier and greater citation by third parties of the published works (See The Effect of Open Access).
4. The journal accepts no responsibility for the opinions expressed by the authors.
